White Pyramid of China may not be White Pyramid of China, page 2
Pages: <<  1    2    3    4    5  >>
ATS Members have flagged this thread 2 times


reply posted on 27-6-2007 @ 11:53 AM by undo
Originally posted by Marduk
yeah how convenient was that


He supposedly took a pic of it at the time but since he was reconnaisance, the film roll was mostly of classified sites other than the pyramid. so it, and the rest of the images on the roll, were filed and marked (not sure if it was top or just secret, but definitely classified). not sure if the original image was ever released. the old images shown today, are from someone else who went there in the 50's, i believe. that image is of a different one, i do believe.

for example, the WWII pilot said that it was

-at least 1000 ft tall. that's an unheard of height for pyramidal structures of any kind.

-for it not to be re-discovered frequently enough to really fuel the history of it, would suggest, if it is real, that it would be tucked away on a valley that is surrounded (as the pilot states) by mountains that rise over 1000 ft from the valley floor (so the pyramid would not be visible from the areas like xian.

-it would have to be away from rivers and roads that wind through the mountains south of xian, in an out of the way location.

-because the pilot was flying between xian and assam, it would have to be somewhere on a trajectory between those two locations.

-because the area had no truly flat locations available to land his plane, it would have to be in an area where the valley is only temporarily flat (on which the pyramid would be resting). this means a pretty narrow valley, with otherwise rough terrain.

-he said it was white, and either metal or stone, and had a capstone that was made from what looked to be a precious gem. he doesn't describe it in the available quote, so what kind of precious gem is a mystery.

- he described it as being at least 40 miles south west of xian. the only mountain ranges with narrow valleys south of xian are about that far away.

the other information that makes me think it might be still officially undiscovered is that the chinese government didn't really think of the available pyramids as pyramids o begin with. yet, all such buildings in other places in the world have been generally referred to as pyramids or pyramidal. not because they are all technically, pyramids, in the traditional sense of the word, but because the concepts are similar enough and far enough back in the ancient past to quantify them as of similar origin.

china is trying to distance itself from its ancient past, as it has a huge religiously traditional population in some areas, and that's a big enough social battle as it is. incorporating things like massive white pyramids capped with huge gemstones, and who knows what else, would fuel a firestorm of controversy in the traditionally religious. i don't think the chinese government wants that additional burden. they've acquiesed to the burial tomb pyramids and approached them as historical monuments, but imagine what would happen if they revealed something along the same lines and scope as the great pyramid of egypt (which we all know is a source of more religious conjecture and controvery than probably any other building on the planet).


reply posted on 27-6-2007 @ 02:28 PM by undo
More google earth angles of the area:



















i didn't realize you could not only see the overhead view,
but various angles of the view from ground level or
higher. cool feature. so i did some tinkering with various
heights looking at it.



reply posted on 27-6-2007 @ 03:37 PM by undo
Originally posted by Marduk
en.wikipedia.org...
en.wikipedia.org...
en.wikipedia.org...


Tell you what, I'll ask hubby to find out if that guy's story is in the files of the Air Force Historian on the base here. If so, it's not pseudohistory, it's history as described by an "official" witness who documented it. They don't have to release the original image, only that the guy did indeed say that and it's part of the record. I could ask that the image be released, of course, but what are the chances of that, if the Chinese government doesn't want it released?

[edit on 27-6-2007 by undo]


reply posted on 27-6-2007 @ 09:03 PM by mojo4sale
Not sure if this can help in your search for info but Gaussman i read somewhere was ficticious, try Sheahan, i think that was his name, michael maybe. I cant verify this but he was also a pilot who was supposed to have seen the pyramid.

mojo

{edit to add}

Ahh it was Maurice Sheahan not Michael. Interesting read but take with a pinch of salt. I had a bit of a look on google earth and couldnt really see anything, but good luck with it.

link

One clarification was discovered: Don Sheahan found a letter written by his father, Col. Sheahan, on January 31, 1961, to a Mr. E. Leslie Carlson, who had a theory connecting the Chinese pyramid to the ancient Sumerians. He had also asked for a photograph. Sheahan wrote:
The large pyramid is probably between 500 feet and 600 feet high and the reported 1,000 feet was exaggerated in several translations from the Chinese li to metric to feet.


Nice thread no matter what you find out.

[edit on 27/6/07 by mojo4sale]
Pages: <<  1    2    3    4    5  >>    ^^TOP^^



Origin of Ancient Jade Tool Baffles Scientists
  Posted 6 days ago with 96 member flags
12,000 Years Old Unexplained Structure
  Posted 4 days ago with 81 member flags
The Uluburun shipwreck sunk 3,400 years ago
  Posted 14 days ago with 70 member flags
Sigiriya : The 8th Wonder of the World
  Posted 4 days ago with 45 member flags
Tomb of Queen Heterpheres
  Posted 16 days ago with 29 member flags
R.O.V. Photos of Sunken Megaliths off Western Cuba
  Posted 10 days ago with 21 member flags

Newest topics getting replies, in real-time:

Free Psychic Readings
  General Chit Chat, Posted 14 hours ago, 108 replies
Hollow Earth Theory New Evidence.
  General Conspiracies, Posted 12 hours ago, 75 replies
Anonymous show your face!
  Rant, Posted 8 hours ago, 61 replies
Free will
  Philosophy and Metaphysics, Posted 16 hours ago, 50 replies