White Pyramid of China may not be White Pyramid of China

nope you were just showing everyone what a big fan of sci fi you were as its the only currency that your brain can think in


funnily enough the dictionary doesn't believe Celestial means outer space either

dictionary.reference.com...
really how simple would it have been for you to look that up
now you just look stupid


we're still waiting for your example. this is the claim you made, do I have to keep reminding you


across the universe ???
you said nothing about a thing travelling across the sky,
obviously I knew because I have studied the culture that they aren't very likely to claim anything about the universe because they didn't understand what it was
you didn't know that because you were mouthing off because you thought you knew things about a culture you have never ever examined at all
well guess what
you didn't

they mention things they can see in the sky
wow amazing
did they mention that saturn has rings at all ?
they would if like you claim they had the capability to fly past it
now why do you think they didn't

you just got served again
going for the record ?

finished wasting everyones time yet sci fi girl ?


[edit on 4-7-2007 by Marduk]

and then of course, is Indra's many headed iron lightning being a meteorite, and then his completely brushing aside the fact another passage has a similar thundering weapon launching into space instead of falling from the sky, which means meteorites apparently come from earth as well as come to earth. An interesting proposition, no doubt. The way scholars handle this kind of thing, currently, is to ignore it because it doesn't fit in the little box they've designed for ancient texts. You know the box that says "PACK OF LIES"?

Marduk tries to pretend he's not prejudice against the texts but if you read his words carefully, he says things like... "fiction," which assumes he knows it's a fiction and that the hindu people think it's a fiction. I wonder, do they?

lol come back for some more have you
the Mahabahtatratatatat is an Epic isn't it
its described as an Epic by Hindus
heres that dictionary that keeps proving you wrong again

dictionary.reference.com...
you ever get sick of being wrong Undo
maybe at some point you'll study something and get it right before pretending to know the truth

hmmm so all scholars are liars as well now are they
seems you think everyone who doesn't agree with you is a liar when in fact earlier in this thread you were caught lying twice and found gulty of overt racism as well
lets look up scholar and see what that means shall we

not you then obviously
dictionary.reference.com...
I'd seek medical help if I were you
can't be nice being so paranoid

i quoted from or mentioned several hindu texts, some poems, some epics, some more modern. you call them a fiction. not all scholars think the ancient texts are lies, no. but ones such as yourself, who do, try to pretend you're being tolerant and understanding of the genius of our forerunners whilst simultaneously accusing them of believing lies, fabrications and fictions. on the one hand you claim the text is referring to a meteorite hitting the earth and on the other hand, you call the work a fiction.

apparently, you want this thread to be closed by drawing attention to it from the mods. not gonna let you do it. ignoring your further responses in this thread.

[edit on 4-7-2007 by undo]

no you cherry picked a line here a line there and strung them together expecting people to believe they were all connected when they weren't

theres that claim again
please link to any scholar claiming that ancient texts are lies

please link to any time I have said texts were lies
theres only one person lying here, that statement you just made was a blatant out and out lie.
you are a liar, whats that now the third time you've lied in this thread, no wonder you're hung up on the idea that everyone is a liar like you are
they aren't beth
most people are far more honest than you are, thats very clear


if you'd examined the evidence you would see that its a poem
a poem is a work that uses imagination to tell a story
heres that dictionary again

you don't understand much at all obviously.

and you finish with another lie
at no time have I asked any mod to close this thread
if they have threatened you with that its because you've lied all the way through it and presented no credible evidence, despite being given every oppotunity

ah so the typical response from someone who can't discuss anything like an adult
sticking your fingers in your ears and screaming LALALALALALA won't make whats in your imagination a reality

Hey Undo,
I have read through this thread and the other billion page thread with the Hindu text arguments.

I think you are reading to heavily into it all. Most of this "ancient text" was written down by a guy who "channeled" the info i have been lead to believe.

Its ok to have an imagination. Just realize where the fantasy ends and reality starts.

Metaphor.

Alternatively, how did Harry Potter win the Quiditch match?

He didn't. It was just a story ....

Whilst some myth may be based on real events, it would be foolish in the extreme to take a subjective translation of a 2,000 year old story, impose modern values and interpretations on it and then assume it all to be a true, literal account of real events. Especially when in the case of the Vedic myths, many of the supposed transplations regarding apparent modern weapons have been entirely made up Whilst others have been quoted well out of context.

Imagine if in 5,000 years time, someone discovers a Harry Potter book ....

The topic is: white pyramid of china may not be the White Pyramid of China

Now... I know all these side trips are diverting, but could you return to the original topic? Side trips certainly deserve their own threads... or you can google the site and bring up older threads that reference the same material.

Back on target, guys.

Hey undo, im not postin about this thread, its about the anunnaki movie. I cant find news on it since you made the thread on them, and that guy said he'd seen a trailer. I cant find any trailer and then is no updated site, do u no anthing about it? much appriciated.

there are three sources of information on the white pyramid that I know of (THE white pyramid has nothing to do with all the lesser and smaller pyramid structures surrounding xian):

it was photographed by the military pilot mentioned in this thread.

it was photographed by a german researcher called hausdorf, who, in his book "The White Pyramid" claims not to have been let closer to the pyramid by the chinese military.

there are some tibetan texts referring to a white pyramid (unfortunately I dont recall which texts. this is something I read years ago).

Mausoleum is just a tomb, the structures in Xian are pyramids. Maoling and Yangling are just names for them. The word "ling" is rather related to a temple or atleast back then i think. I'm chinese, =p but illiterate because i'm in the US.

What makes u think this?

Not been able to find the "Made in China" stamp on it? lol

reply to post by Marduk

---

"Abbas Ibn Firnas flew the first heavier than air aircraft in 875 CE"

I dont think flying camels count although they would be "heavier than air".

Based on these and several other eyewitness accounts, the historian Ahmed Mohammed al-Maqqari described the event as follows:

"Among other very curious experiments which he made, one is his trying to fly. He covered himself with feathers for the purpose, attached a couple of wings to his body, and, getting on an eminence, flung himself down into the air, when according to the testimony of several trustworthy writers who witnessed the performance, he flew a considerable distance, as if he had been a bird, but, in alighting again on the place whence he had started, his back was very much hurt, for not knowing that birds when they alight come down upon their tails, he forgot to provide himself with one."

Lynn Townsend White, Jr. (Spring, 1961). "Eilmer of Malmesbury, an Eleventh Century Aviator: A Case Study of Technological Innovation, Its Context and Tradition", Technology and Culture 2 (2), p. 97-111 [100-101].