It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by deltaboy
Originally posted by intrepid
I haven't seen this. Care to elaborate on this? I think we DID learn that lesson from Viet Nam.
Have we?
Lets go to this story...
FORT WORTH, Texas -- The owner of a local convenience store tells NBC 5 he has fired an employee who mistreated a customer who is also a U.S. Marine.
The firing comes in response to protests at the store as well as an e-mail campaign circulating throughout Dallas/Fort Worth. The e-mail, written by Heather Dowell, tells of her brother's treatment while visiting the store.
According to Dowell's e-mail, her brother, Jason Young, attempted to make a purchase at the One Stop Grocery and Grill on 8th Avenue in Fort Worth. The clerk allegedly asked if Young was a Marine, and when he replied yes, the clerk left the counter and never returned.
Outraged, Dowell began the e-mail campaign calling for the boycott of the store.
On Tuesday, several people protested the store as the e-mail continued to make its rounds.
According to the store owner, the incident was a misunderstanding and the employee in question was fired.
Now when reports of atrocities committed by Army and Marine personnel, civilians with radio and tv tends to view the personnel as a bunch of murderers. Just like during Vietnam War when many Americans have tvs and watching news of civilians getting killed in the war, they blame the troops, airmen, sailors, etc.
Are we seeing it again?
Originally posted by Langolier
I hold the insurgents more responsible for the bloodshed than I do the Coalition.
[edit on 30-5-2007 by Langolier]
Originally posted by RedDragon
Hey man, I provided the stats. American soldiers kill 4 times as many civilians in Iraq as insurgents. Who else but the troops, airmen, sailors, etc. are to blame for the dead people?
The troops, airmen, sailors, etc. are the ones who carry the guns and bombs, the ones who drop the guns and bombs, and the ones who kill all the innocent people with those guns and bombs.
Originally posted by deltaboy
Originally posted by RedDragon
Hey man, I provided the stats. American soldiers kill 4 times as many civilians in Iraq as insurgents. Who else but the troops, airmen, sailors, etc. are to blame for the dead people?
The troops, airmen, sailors, etc. are the ones who carry the guns and bombs, the ones who drop the guns and bombs, and the ones who kill all the innocent people with those guns and bombs.
Let me see that stats again if you provide please? I like to see the proof that Americans kill 4 times as many as insurgents did.
Originally posted by RedDragon
I've provided the source twice in this thread: Iraqi Body Count. Google it up.
Coalition troops are responsible for 37% of civilian fatalities since 2003 while insurgents are responsible for 9%.
Originally posted by deltaboy
Originally posted by RedDragon
I've provided the source twice in this thread: Iraqi Body Count. Google it up.
Coalition troops are responsible for 37% of civilian fatalities since 2003 while insurgents are responsible for 9%.
Well provide it again, as I ask politely instead of having me going around the place. I went to Iraqi Body Count and it just shows this.
And this is just page 1.
www.iraqbodycount.net...
I don't see how this proves that Americans are responsible for the majority of civilian casualties when you got data that shows otherwise.
The report says the US and its allies were responsible for the largest share (37%) of the 24,865 deaths. The remaining deaths were attributed to anti-occupation forces (9%), crime (36%), and unknown agents (11%).
Who did the killing?
* 37%. US-led forces killed 37% of civilian victims.
* 9%. Anti-occupation forces/insurgents killed 9% of civilian victims.
* 36%. Post-invasion criminal violence accounted for 36% of all deaths.
* 11%. Unknown agents (11%).
Killings by anti-occupation forces, crime and unknown agents have shown a steady rise over the entire period.
Originally posted by RedDragon
The report says the US and its allies were responsible for the largest share (37%) of the 24,865 deaths. The remaining deaths were attributed to anti-occupation forces (9%), crime (36%), and unknown agents (11%).
Who did the killing?
* 37%. US-led forces killed 37% of civilian victims.
* 9%. Anti-occupation forces/insurgents killed 9% of civilian victims.
* 36%. Post-invasion criminal violence accounted for 36% of all deaths.
* 11%. Unknown agents (11%).
Killings by anti-occupation forces, crime and unknown agents have shown a steady rise over the entire period.
Originally posted by RedDragon
Originally posted by Langolier
I hold the insurgents more responsible for the bloodshed than I do the Coalition.
[edit on 30-5-2007 by Langolier]
Again, you're completely blind to the statistics. The statistics show that the coalition is 4 times more responsible than the insurgents for the bloodshed and that's even counting dead policemen, etc. as civilians which I think is wrong.
[edit on 5/31/07 by RedDragon]
Originally posted by GradyPhilpott
These are the darkest of times when we have twenty year old men walking our streets with their pants below their butts and their ears stretched out like savages, while young American women are being blown apart overseas seeking to quell the blood lust of radical Islamists.
.
Originally posted by BASSPLYR
Not blaming the american military for all of these deaths, war is war..
Originally posted by neformore
So what you are telling us is that people should have no right to freedom of expression via their appearance because they look like savages when they do, and that everyone should be made to serve in the army?