It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Insurgency is most commonly used to describe a movement's unlawfulness by virtue of not being authorized by or in accordance with the law of the land. When used by a state or an authority under threat, "insurgency" implies an illegitimacy of cause upon those rising up, whereas those rising up will see the authority itself as being illegitimate. In cases of rebellions, the term insurgents refers to those who are not part of the decision-making entity that has the ability to make laws.
Originally posted by deadbang
It's B.S. to sit here and listen to someone (someone who has never sworn an oath to protect a damn thing in their life) call me and all other verterans "sanctioned killers" for the govt., when it's the same rich elite who send us to protect their monetary interets.
Originally posted by ThePieMaN
Thats such a lovely picture. It gives me goosebumps thinking about it. Its just a damn shame that if we hadn't been there for all the wrong reasons that picture would never exist and that kid would have been in school instead of ducking behind a US soldier and being in that position.
Originally posted by Langolier
I hold the insurgents more responsible for the bloodshed than I do the Coalition. Who are the ones who chose to fight there battles in city streets, in markets, and in apartment buildings? The insurgents did. They are the ones who force urban combat upon us and they are the ones responsible for the un-neccessary civilian deaths that follow. They are also the ones deliberately targeting innocent people in daily car-bomb attacks. They are the ones trying to destroy a rising democracy.
That people would still support these monsters speaks volumes about their own character and motivations.
[edit on 30-5-2007 by Langolier]
Originally posted by deadbang
I have to be honest...some of the posters on this site make me absolutely sick!...what a bunch of double standards.
So, here is how the double standard goes...
Poor kids- We (me too) join the military because we need education, training etc.., otherwise we end up serving at Mcdonalds or some other piece of crap job, In joing the military we obtain the means to make our lives better, rise above the station to which we were born. But we do have to take orders..
Rich kids- They get to go to college on mom and dad's dime, protest "the man" and his robot killers, form associations with other rich kids and go on to influence the world at the corporate level. They end up being the decision makers of the future.
Who sends the poor kids to war...the damn rich kids parents and in turn some day the rich kids themselves...
It's B.S. to sit here and listen to someone (someone who has never sworn an oath to protect a damn thing in their life) call me and all other verterans "sanctioned killers" for the govt., when it's the same rich elite who send us to protect their monetary interets.
Protest yourselves!!!...the military is just a scapegoat for the elite...use it when it suits ...blame it for all societal ills when it does not!
Wrong, if you are aware of the history of the region before Saddam and during Saddam you know very well that the Sunnis in power oppressed the Kurds and Shiites.
Wrong again.....Shiites are majority in Iraq and also in Iran with shared tribal links.
Originally posted by darkbluesky
Thanks Marge but you misunderstood my statement, I was simply pointing out that most of the Iraqis who favor a US presence are Sunni, not that Sunnis are a majority of the population.
Originally posted by intrepid
Originally posted by SpeakerofTruth
Intrepid, wanting to install a democratic government is a far cry from wanting to install some Mullah controlled theocracy.
From who's point of view?
Originally posted by RedDragon
Originally posted by Freezer
Did the soldiers make the decision to go into wars?
That the soldiers didn't make the decision to go into war is another common misconception.
Of course they decided to go to war. Wars can't be fought without soldiers so the soldiers are obviously the people ultimately responsible for the war and all the resulting death since they were the ones that actually carried it out. Politicians and generals write words on paper but the soldiers are the ones with the guns and bombs shooting and bombing people.
[edit on 5/30/07 by RedDragon]
Originally posted by intrepid
I haven't seen this. Care to elaborate on this? I think we DID learn that lesson from Viet Nam.
FORT WORTH, Texas -- The owner of a local convenience store tells NBC 5 he has fired an employee who mistreated a customer who is also a U.S. Marine.
The firing comes in response to protests at the store as well as an e-mail campaign circulating throughout Dallas/Fort Worth. The e-mail, written by Heather Dowell, tells of her brother's treatment while visiting the store.
According to Dowell's e-mail, her brother, Jason Young, attempted to make a purchase at the One Stop Grocery and Grill on 8th Avenue in Fort Worth. The clerk allegedly asked if Young was a Marine, and when he replied yes, the clerk left the counter and never returned.
Outraged, Dowell began the e-mail campaign calling for the boycott of the store.
On Tuesday, several people protested the store as the e-mail continued to make its rounds.
According to the store owner, the incident was a misunderstanding and the employee in question was fired.
Originally posted by hippichick
The soldier is armed with a rifle. A rifle is hard to bring to bear on an object behind you hanging off your waist. The kid knows this and knows that he is safe from this soldier. Also the US soldiers are less likely (but not always) to fire on one of their own and so he is safe (temporarily) from US fire.
Bit about face there chap.
Shia initially welcomed the invasion, whereas the Sunni have always been against it. As of now, the Shia are starting to get testy as well. Down south near Basra, British forces are facing increasing attacks daily now, whereas originally, it was fairly peaceful.