Loose change on the view , was blocked by the president, page 6
Pages: <<  3    4    5    6  >>
ATS Members have flagged this thread 10 times


reply posted on 25-5-2007 @ 04:55 PM by dariousg
Originally posted by nick7261
Originally posted by dariousg
You find out that it gets cancelled by the producers the day before it is supposed to take place. You have a fight with someone on the show and then you simply tell them you are not coming back.


Only problem with your theory is Rosie called off yesterday's show to be with her partner on her birthday. The producers didn't cancel the show. Of course the CTers are going to think the birthday story is fake too and what really happened is that Bush hurriedly threw together his press conference to cancel yesterday's show, then strong-armed the producers into firing Rosie before she could expose him.


No, the show was cancelled at the beginning of this week. They even admit that they neglected to change their online schedule to reflect this. So, it WAS cancelled on Monday and she has her blow out with Elizabeth on Tuesday. The timing does work.

Considering she was negotiating with the ABC execs about trying to finish her term it does seem unlikely that she was spending the time happily in birthday celebration.

I guess we could go on and on about 'conspiracy' and such as to whether Bush forced her out through various lines and threats. Not him personally of course but his people. The fact is that once she went public with her opinions, even though she has always had very CONTROVERSIAL opinions throughout her entire career (why she was hired in the first place), she was absolutely smeared by the ultra conservatives (I don't like the NeoCon term but I guess that is what you can call them). It's kind of funny how they resorted to calling her a fat lesbian, conspiracy nut, a virus, and so on. Yeah, really big on their part. Instead of asking her to sit down and debate with them (which I'm afraid she would do quite well in) they stab her in the back and smear her.

If you think that this would be the first time that an administration went so far as to single someone out and destroy them then you may be living in a virtual reality. People need to look at history. It's all out there for the taking.


reply posted on 25-5-2007 @ 05:08 PM by EugeneAxeman
Originally posted by JIMC5499
Originally posted by UNnoticed
I don't see any other celebrities stepping up to the plate to put their point across like she has...so if rosie is all we got's then rosie it is...unless one of you fine folks wants to step up and take charge...but I don't see anyone doing such...except criticizing rosie for her actions...



Anybody want to hazard a guess as to why no one else other than Rosie wants to step forward? .....................................I didn't think so.


Bruce Willis, Charlie Sheen.

Just off the top of my head.

Jimmy Kimmel allowed Sheen to voice his opinion, and even prompted him to do so.

Not everyone has their heads in the sand on this one.

Building 7 is the smoking gun. It started burning almost as soon as the South Tower was hit, and was blasted by steel from the North Tower when it fell. Much of this steel can be seen flying horizontally outward from the mushroom cloud.

This steel made the trip between buildings (a distance of over 350 feet in three seconds or less) while trailing plumes of smoke. I'm sorry, but the claims of the trails being composed of dust falling off of the steel does not wash. As an experiment, coat a steel beam in as much dust as you like and then fling it at a velocity of 100 feet per second. Record the distance travelled by the dust. You will be lucky to get any dust to move more than 20 feet, unless you have a strong tail wind.

Keep in mind that building 7 was upwind of the North Tower. The smoke flowing from the steel is an indicator of a metal fire in progress. You need temperatures in the neighborhood of 3000 F to start one of those.

So do we have any physics experts who would like to belly up to the bar and lay out the explanation for the power by which several multi-ton and burning steel beams were launched outward from both towers, impaling themselves into the outer walls, and even completely penetrating some walls that were several hundred feet from the towers?

Really. I have yet to see any official explanation for this phenomenon.



[edit on 25/5/07 by EugeneAxeman]


reply posted on 31-5-2007 @ 05:33 PM by billybob
Originally posted by amfirst
WTC 7 debunked here. Shows WTC7 get hit by debris from the towers. Do your research before u speck.

www.youtube.com...


hit on one side. should tip. but all four corners give out within milliseconds of each other.
for those of us with good physics knowledge, 'debunking' isn't that simple, amfirst.

none of the huge holes(of which pictures only VERY recently surfaced, ....which is suspect), affected any of the columns.

pictures of damage don't match each other, so, it is possible that photoshop has been used to 'paint in' damage that wasn't actually there.
Pages: <<  3    4    5    6  >>    ^^TOP^^



Flight 93 was headed for Building 7
  Posted 10 days ago with 48 member flags
9/11 INTERCEPTED
  Posted 2 days ago with 45 member flags
9/11: The WTC Elevator Key
  Posted 12 days ago with 43 member flags
What are your favorite 9/11 debunking tactics?
  Posted 6 days ago with 17 member flags
Who is the Joker on ATS radio now running their mouth?
  Posted 14 days ago with 13 member flags
Was the government a co-conspirator?
  Posted 16 days ago with 9 member flags
British Police Want Us To Present False Flag Terror Evidence.
  Posted 6 days ago with 8 member flags