It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by rrahim1
Dude what if Cho agreed to take Antidepressent's like Zoloft. I tried it before and the first little piece I took. I was sitting in class and I wasn't feeling like myself, I was edge, ready riot. That's why I'm saying that he must have known that it is a drug that get's you riled up. He must have taken alot and while it was kicking in he went nuts because the drug makes you crazy.
RW: ...Stephen Hyman, a well-known neuroscientist and the former director of the National Institute of Mental Health, wrote a paper in 1996 that looked at how psychiatric drugs affect the brain. He wrote that all these drugs create perturbations in neurotransmitter functions. And he notes that the brain, in response to this drug from the outside, alters its normal functions and goes through a series of compensatory adaptations.
In other words, it tries to adapt to the fact that an antipsychotic drug is blocking normal dopamine functions. Or in the case of antidepressants, it tries to compensate for the fact that you're blocking a normal reuptake of serotonin. The way it does this is to adapt in the opposite way. So, if you're blocking dopamine in the brain, the brain tries to put out more dopamine and it actually increases the number of dopamine receptors. So a person placed on antipsychotic drugs will end up with an abnormally high number of dopamine receptors in the brain.
If you give someone an antidepressant, and that tries to keep serotonin levels too high in the brain, it does exactly the opposite. It stops producing as much serotonin as it normally does and it reduces the number of serotonin receptors in the brain. So someone who is on an antidepressant, after a time ends up with an abnormally low level of serotonin receptors in the brain. And here's what Hyman concluded about this: After these changes happened, the patient's brain is functioning in a way that is "qualitatively as well as quantitatively different from the normal state." So what Stephen Hyman, former head of the NIMH, has done is present a paradigm for how these drugs affect the brain that shows that they're inducing a pathological state.
SS: So the paradox is there's no evidence for modern psychiatry's claim that there is any pathological biochemical imbalance in the brain that causes mental illness, but if you treat people with these new wonder drugs, that is what creates a pathological imbalance?
RW: Yes, these drugs disrupt normal brain chemistry. That's the real paradox here. And the real tragedy is, that even as we peddle these drugs as chemical balancers, chemical fixers, in truth we're doing precisely the opposite. We're taking a brain that has no known abnormal brain chemistry, and by placing people on the drugs, we're perturbing that normal chemistry.
Originally posted by rrahim1
It fit's with the Master plan.
1) Create economic despair.
2) Drug the population up with coc aine, marijuana, alcohol, extasy, heroin, antidepressents.
Shar, I don't think you understand what I'm saying. Of course, I know that anti-depressants don't work for everyone. I never said they didn't.
quote: forestlady,
If a person has major depression from abuse, then the ONLY thing that will help that person is meds.
It doesn't matter what caused it, it's still depression and it's still an imbalance in the brain and still can be alleviated with the right meds
It doesn't matter in that anti-depressants will work on depression, no matter what the cause.
There are any number of gungho, ignorant "shrinks" who will tell you that you can get thru any type of depression simply by counseling alone. This is not true.
Look above at your own quote. "The only thing that will help that person is medicine." Then here your saying no they don't always work. Your very confusing.
forestlady,
No, the meds don't always work
is better than rethinking and talking it out. Wow!
electric shock
# Lithium carbonate —- the first Food and Drug Administration-approved mood stabilizer, and still popular in treatment. Therapeutic drug monitoring required. Monitor blood lithium levels (therapeutic range: 0.6 or 0.8-1.2 mEq/L) and look for signs and symptoms of toxicity (such as nausea, vomiting, diarrhea, ataxia). See also lithium orotate, another lithium salt.
# Valproic acid (Depakene®), divalproex sodium (Depakote®), and sodium valproate (Depacon®) — Available in extended release form. Can be very irritating to the stomach, especially when taken as valproic acid. Liver function and CBC should be monitored. Therapeutic drug monitoring is required.
# Lamotrigine (Lamictal®) — Particularly effective for bipolar depression. Monitor for signs and symptoms of Stevens-Johnson syndrome, very rare but can be fatal.
# Carbamazepine (Tegretol®) — CBC should be monitored; can lower white blood cell count. Therapeutic drug monitoring is required. Not FDA-approved for bipolar disorder, but widely used for many years.
# Gabapentin (Neurontin®) — Not FDA approved for bipolar disorder. Recent scientific studies suggest it is not an effective treatment, however many psychiatrists continue to use it.
# Oxcarbazepine (Trileptal®) — Not FDA approved for bipolar disorder.
# Topiramate (Topamax®
Due in large part to the funding from the drug industry, the FDA can no longer be trusted to protect and safeguard Americans. Financial control of the FDA by the pharmaceutical manufacturers is unethical and the practice has corrupted the nation's oldest, largest and most powerful consumer protection agency. Due to very large political contributions from the pharmaceutical industry, Washington politicians and the White House have proven to be supportive of the brand name pharmaceutical industry to the detriment of U.S. citizens. Americans can not remain idle. Americans must act, act now and act decisively.
In addition to campaign contributions to elected officials and candidates, companies, labor unions, and other organizations spend billions of dollars each year to lobby Congress and federal agencies. Some special interests retain lobbying firms, many of them located along Washington's legendary K Street; others have lobbyists working in-house. We've got totals spent on lobbying, beginning in 1998, for everyone from AAI Corp. to Zurich Financial.
Client
Total
US Chamber of Commerce
$317,164,680
American Medical Assn
$156,375,500
General Electric
$137,770,000
American Hospital Assn
$129,114,026
Edison Electric Institute
$105,642,628
AARP
$105,332,064
Pharmaceutical Rsrch & Mfrs of America
$104,302,000
National Assn of Realtors
$97,530,000
Business Roundtable
$97,060,000
Northrop Grumman
$95,682,374
Blue Cross/Blue Shield
$84,270,649
Freddie Mac
$81,884,048
Lockheed Martin
$80,206,965
Boeing Co
$77,898,310
Verizon Communications
$75,836,522
Philip Morris
$75,500,000
General Motors
$71,158,483
Fannie Mae
$70,957,000
Ford Motor Co
$67,670,808
US Telecom Assn
$65,280,000
Total Lobbying Spending
1998
$1.45 Billion
1999
$1.45 Billion
2000
$1.57 Billion
2001
$1.63 Billion
2002
$1.83 Billion
2003
$2.06 Billion
2004
$2.19 Billion
2005
$2.42 Billion
2006
$2.54 Billion
Originally posted by Shar
I take it you didn't read my post right above yours.
There is no way a pill is going to help someone who has been abused. Abuse causes depression as well. However, it's two types of depression. The doctors need to discover what type of depression it is.