It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by bigdaddy7ftr
I'll take witnessing "dots" in the sky first hand that defy explaination, and behave like nothing else known to man, over seeing nothing at all anyday.
If you are referrencing the latest "UFO Fleet" video, then yes, I saw the same phenomenon the very next day in the same location. I also saw the "Craft" that flew overhead in Phoenix in 1997 before the "Phoenix Lights" footage that nearly everyone saw.
While I must say that seeing the "Craft" up close and directly overhead was by far the best sighting I had, and most exciting one; I still get excited every time I see something new. No matter how far away or obscure it may be.
Everytime I witness something new it makes me believe we are just that much closer to worldwide disclosure.
Originally posted by classified material
I get the feeling that you have not researched the UFO subject (or at least not much) yet you feel compelled to spout off like you know UFOs are nothing but secret earthly aircraft and laugh at us. What are you doing here? Go away. If you're going to contribute from a skeptical stand point then why don't you provide us with some solid proof and data of your point of view...?
Originally posted by classified material
I get the feeling that you have not researched the UFO subject (or at least not much) yet you feel compelled to spout off like you know UFOs are nothing but secret earthly aircraft and laugh at us. What are you doing here? Go away. If you're going to contribute from a skeptical stand point then why don't you provide us with some solid proof and data of your point of view...?
Originally posted by Diplomat
Originally posted by classified material
I get the feeling that you have not researched the UFO subject (or at least not much) yet you feel compelled to spout off like you know UFOs are nothing but secret earthly aircraft and laugh at us. What are you doing here? Go away. If you're going to contribute from a skeptical stand point then why don't you provide us with some solid proof and data of your point of view...?
I have not researched the UFO subject?
I went to high school in Roswell, New Mexico of all places, so I think I have been doing my research. I have been following the Aliens/UFO phenomenon since 1997. I probably know more than you, try me...
Originally posted by Diplomat
Originally posted by classified material
I get the feeling that you have not researched the UFO subject (or at least not much) yet you feel compelled to spout off like you know UFOs are nothing but secret earthly aircraft and laugh at us. What are you doing here? Go away. If you're going to contribute from a skeptical stand point then why don't you provide us with some solid proof and data of your point of view...?
And why should I prove anything? People like you are the ones with the fantastic fairy-tales, so YOU should do the proving.
It is common knowledge that Aliens are not here on Earth. You believe otherwise, which is looked at as somewhat ridiculous, therefore you should provide the proof since you make the fantastic claims.
And if you can't prove your fantastic claims, well then I think that constitutes as MY PROOF.
Originally posted by VType
Some researcher you are. In all your posts in this thread youve made it quite clear that you do not believe in ET or UFo's other than it being military craft and then ask why we care even about that.
Seems you have allready made up your mind and want to convert others. sorry but Ill keep my informed mind open thank you very much.
[edit on 30-4-2007 by VType]
Originally posted by classified material
Fantastic fairy-tales? Wrong. Again, go look at the data and all the military folks who have said the UFO phenomena is very real.
You're the one saying all UFOs are of human origin. You have no proof of that. You shouldn't laugh at us when you really have no clue.
It is common knowledge that Aliens are not visiting Earth? Really? That's funny. Last time I checked the polls, the majority of the American public thinks otherwise.
I'm not saying I have proof. I'm saying there is enough data to keep investigating this subject and hold those in highest power within the Government and Military accountable for finding out what these UFOs are.
I'm done with you. You annoy me to death.
Originally posted by classified material
I tend to doubt that UFOs in the 1950's and even of today going 20,000+ mph, are silent, have no wings, can stop on a dime, hover, and shoot straight up are of human origin.
Originally posted by classified material
Ok dude. They're all just dots. Happy now?
Originally posted by Diplomat
Originally posted by classified material
I tend to doubt that UFOs in the 1950's and even of today going 20,000+ mph, are silent, have no wings, can stop on a dime, hover, and shoot straight up are of human origin.
You can't even prove what those "UFOs" in the 1950's were in the first place! You don't know for sure that those fast-moving dots in the sky are REALLY Aliens lol. Like I said earlier, no one knows for sure what the "dots" are.
You act like dots moving around fast in the sky proves that Aliens from other planets are here. Just because a dot of light moves around in the sky does not mean it is an actual spaceship. There are probably thousands of explanations for what the fast-moving dots could be...
Originally posted by Diplomat
Originally posted by classified material
Ok dude. They're all just dots. Happy now?
I guess I'll be happy until someone can actually PROVE that they are something more than "just dots." You can't... and your argument that dots in the sky in the 1950's that moved in a certain way proves that Aliens are here is ridiculous...
Originally posted by VType
Fair enough. However one of those thousands of explantions could be aliens. So as you say Who knows. However it boggles my mind how we(us gov) could possess such craft capable of such extremes for so long yet never use them in any conflict. That would be restraint like our leaders have never shown before and as unbeliveable as any alien story. Hell look at Nukes the minute we discovered them we implenented them and I bet the same is true with any other discoveries weve made(lasers,lf's,stealth,etc..). If the US had these craft surely they would use them to dominate militarily and politically. Right? Otherwise whats the sence of possesing such milestones?
IMO our Gov has some of these radical tech's but I dont think we are the inventors of them at all and more along the lines of borrowed,stolen or backwards engineering or ????.
Nature and the Universe is an ever unfolding secret and we are so far from true understanding that we scoff at other than conventional and convienant thought when discussing all the many mysteries and possibilities.
Im convinced it will take ET's mug to land on national tv and during primetime in order to be considered as real by most.
Yep we are real advanced arent we. We are probably no more than smart apes too ET in the sheme of things and a quick brief of the news on any given day pretty much confirms this sadly.
[edit on 30-4-2007 by VType]
Originally posted by schuyler
Hey guys,
Listen, the Diplomat (who isn't) went to high school in Roswell, and as we all know, high school graduation in Roswell is a prerequisite for any serious UFO researcher. He has also studied UFOs since 1997, a ten year span that could mean "since he was ten" or could mean "since he retired." We don't really know (and I make no presumptions.)
The real issue I'm having a problem with is this: Where's the beef? I mean, what is the point of this thread?
Originally posted by Diplomat
The point is: If all these different species have been visiting our planet for many years, and even interacting with all kinds of random people, then we (the public) would know by now that Aliens exist for SURE.
The general public does not know this for sure, most actually believe the opposite.
Originally posted by tezzajw
Please show me a link to the data source that you used to determine that most people believe the opposite?
Are you just making that up, or can you support it with opinion poll data?