Einstein was right: space and time bend

Originally posted by menguard
The Universe interfolds on itself, so a "new design" is carried through the wavelengths of time/being, nothing more than a microminature depiction of the self folding in on itself.

Damned if you did not screw up a perfictly good scientific post with rubbish.

Anyone who quotes themselves must be nuerotic.

Originally posted by Tom Bedlam
Which is pretty much just babble.

"wavelengths of time/being"?

Can you even muster up a definition of wavelength? How that applies to time? No?


It's wonderful to sit around with your Zen Koan Generator or whatnot and post meaningless phrases, but it's generally an indicator of mental laziness.

It's also disruptive in the science forum... It should be a respect thing, but some people feel they have to force their nonsense on others, sad really.

lol how fantastic,

so when superman files round the earth faster than light in the first movie he could actually turn back time.

I love how people have a go at a member for using "zen like" phrases.. "the bending of spacetime" sounds more ludicrous to me!

Einstein was a clever man, but his theories are seriously flawed.

One should ask, why is Einstein infinitly more famous than Nikola Tesla (if you've ever heard of him!). Tesla understood more about the fabric of reality than Einstein ever did. He also understood the idea of the cosmic ether/zero point energy, something that Einsteins theories negate because it doesn't work with them..

Tesla gave us electricity. Einstein gave us "the bomb"..

Originally posted by Tom Bedlam
Which is pretty much just babble.

"wavelengths of time/being"?

Can you even muster up a definition of wavelength? How that applies to time? No?


It's wonderful to sit around with your Zen Koan Generator or whatnot and post meaningless phrases, but it's generally an indicator of mental laziness.

Answer:The periodical time in which time travels.

Originally posted by shrunkensimon
I love how people have a go at a member for using "zen like" phrases.. "the bending of spacetime" sounds more ludicrous to me!

Einstein was a clever man, but his theories are seriously flawed.

One should ask, why is Einstein infinitly more famous than Nikola Tesla (if you've ever heard of him!). Tesla understood more about the fabric of reality than Einstein ever did. He also understood the idea of the cosmic ether/zero point energy, something that Einsteins theories negate because it doesn't work with them..

Tesla gave us electricity. Einstein gave us "the bomb"..

Isn't it amazing then how many times that observations agree with it! I guess that's just random happenstance.

Actually, your last statement is doubly wrong. Tesla didn't "give you electricity" - he gave you the AC motor. Einstein didn't work on "the bomb", either. At any rate, if that's your argument, you have to agree "the bomb" worked? If so, and it was based on Einstein's work, is he "seriously flawed" or was it correct?

Can you define "zero point energy" without looking at the net for help? Did Tesla ever use that phrase?

Originally posted by menguard

Answer:The periodical time in which time travels.

That's certainly not a wavelength. Try again.

Originally posted by Tom Bedlam

Originally posted by menguard

Answer:The periodical time in which time travels.

That's certainly not a wavelength. Try again.

What is matter made out of.

Originally posted by menguard
What is matter made out of.

In order from largest to smallest.

Atoms>Sub-atomic particles>point particles/(theoretically)Oscilating
strands of 2D energy>Supradimensional knots.

Originally posted by Tom Bedlam

Originally posted by menguard

Answer:The periodical time in which time travels.

That's certainly not a wavelength. Try again.

Thoughts are made up of the light spectrum.

Originally posted by iori_komei

Originally posted by menguard
What is matter made out of.

In order from largest to smallest.

Atoms>Sub-atomic particles>point particles/(theoretically)Oscilating
strands of 2D energy>Supradimensional knots.

Energy! Everything is energy from the smallest supra-dimensional knots to the largest star in the universe and everything else in between.

We are nothing more than a "nonphysical" thought existing in a physical Universe.

Originally posted by Tom Bedlam

Actually, your last statement is doubly wrong. Tesla didn't "give you electricity" - he gave you the AC motor. Einstein didn't work on "the bomb", either.

Can you define "zero point energy" without looking at the net for help? Did Tesla ever use that phrase?

I beg to differ. Tesla did give us electricity. Edisons DC current was never going to get anywhere, because it is very inefficient at being transmitted over distance. If Tesla hadn't challenged Edisons DC current, we could well have ended up with power stations on every block. Also the amount of inventions Tesla came up with demonstrates to me beyond a shadow of a doubt that he understood more about reality than history books let on. He understood the idea of vibration, aswell as the cosmic vibration/ether.

Einstein didn't make the bomb, but played a big part in getting it developed. He sent a letter to Rosevelt urging him that an atomic bomb should be built, under paranoia that the Nazis were going to get there first...

Tesla mite not have called it Zero point, but he certainly knew of it. Definiton of ZPE? I don know, the extraction of energy from the time domain/quantum flux of the universe/reality.

I suggest you watch a documentary called "Thunderbolts of the Gods" on google video, and then you mite understand how Tesla was able to get unlimited energy from the Sun (because its not a giant fusion reaction, rather, just a reaction on the surface of the Sun. Same goes for blackholes, they are just stars behaving in a very strange way on their surface.)

Originally posted by etshrtslr

Originally posted by iori_komei

Originally posted by menguard
What is matter made out of.

In order from largest to smallest.

Atoms>Sub-atomic particles>point particles/(theoretically)Oscilating
strands of 2D energy>Supradimensional knots.

Energy! Everything is energy from the smallest supra-dimensional knots to the largest star in the universe and everything else in between.

Exactly, energy is always in constant motion.

Originally posted by menguard

Originally posted by Tom Bedlam

Originally posted by menguard

Answer:The periodical time in which time travels.

That's certainly not a wavelength. Try again.

Thoughts are made up of the light spectrum.

Oh, bullcrap.

See, you new agey guys try to use physics and chemistry terms that actually have meaning, in order to arrogate their authority to your generally indefensible attempts at philosophy.

You'd be hard pressed to define "light spectrum" without using wikipedia, much less could you produce a really rigorous definition of "thought". Many a philosopher better than you has debated that point.

Tesla would have given us a new potential to survive where others have dreamed.

Einstein, gave us what he thought we needed a physical implosion.I guess thats one way to prove theory correct, energy is never destroyed or created, perhaps one of those babies going off would set an example of energy in constant motion.Things are always being recycled through the Universe.

Originally posted by Tom Bedlam

Originally posted by menguard

Originally posted by Tom Bedlam

Originally posted by menguard

Answer:The periodical time in which time travels.

That's certainly not a wavelength. Try again.

Thoughts are made up of the light spectrum.

Oh, bullcrap.

See, you new agey guys try to use physics and chemistry terms that actually have meaning, in order to arrogate their authority to your generally indefensible attempts at philosophy.

You'd be hard pressed to define "light spectrum" without using wikipedia, much less could you produce a really rigorous definition of "thought". Many a philosopher better than you has debated that point.

It is not a new thought but a pattern repeating itself through Time.Just as all of our answers, being refined to follow suit to that potential at large.

Now that its apparently proven the planets bend space-time what are the implications of this? Can space-time be bent on a smaller scale? Can it be bent to the point of being a circle? And if possible does that mean time travel either to the future or the past?

[edit on 16-4-2007 by etshrtslr]

When consciousness happens on a large scale anything can happen, but what makes that change desirable is the energetic system at large pushing and pulling things where they need to be.We can manipulate matter to our potential within a certain field of Gravitational polarity.

Originally posted by mrmonsoon

The early results from Gravity Probe B, one of Nasa's most complicated satellites, confirmed yesterday 'to a precision of better than 1 per cent' the assertion Einstein made 90 years ago - that an object such as the Earth does indeed distort the fabric of space and time.

Please visit the link provided for the complete story.

LINK

Imagine what we will know tomorrow!!

the Gravity Probe B may have sent data that translates to Earth's gravity distorting the Space around it....

but as for 'Time distortion', that was determined back in the 1960s.
after the USSR Sputnik satellite, and sometime around the USA Telstar satellite...
science set an Atomic Clock in orbit calibrated with an Atomic clock here on Earth...the difference in elapsed time was tiny-- but it was a measurable difference, proof that time does slow down as speed increases

that was 50+ years ago, not just something learned yesterday,
but i guess it has taken the intervening 50+ years to devise a gravity experiment which might prove Einstein correct.
(even though time-space is an inseperable 'fabric',
and proving One; i.e. time distortion, proves the Other; i.e. space distortion)

interesting, but, only an outside observer would know that time-space is being bent/distorted/looped...so its all an academic exercise