Bush blows chance to kill Osama THREE times

Originally posted by Cyrus

Originally posted by REASON
evil bush.....he is a mass murderer?


So i guess saddam is the good guy.
apparently..yes, when compared to bush

are u serious.

How can I have a debate with you when u have alot of hate for Pres. Bush and u don't have ur facts straight.

Acording to Cyrus.....

Bush = Mass murder

Saddam = Angel

Cyrus........ur delusional.

So your from Ukraine huh?
Do you Idolize Stalin also?
Especialy when he caused great famine in Ukraine by taking the ukrainians supplies of food?
Wide spread canibalism was reported in ukraine during those times.
stalin by the way murderd MILLIONS of his own people!

I BET U LOVE STALIN.

I bet u would put stalin on a higher level than pres bush.

Lets see.....Cyrus sees these fomulas in his head....

Bush = bad man

stalin = good man
hitler= good man
saddam = good man
milosevic = good man
Current pres of NK (kim jong iLL???) = good man

I thought the world promised after WWII that we wouldn't let the holocaust happen again?

yet with certain ignoring and thinking alowed, people turn their back and let monsters lead.

These men u view as go"good" in your eye have tortured, executed, murdered.

When was the last time Pres. Bush called the army to cause a premature famine. steal food from say.....california....or new york.
kill thousands.

When was the last time Pres. Bush ordered all prisoners from a overpopulated prison to be executed to "free up space" like ur friend saddam did.

When was the last time Pres Bush ordered Ethnic cleansing of a certain race Like your buddy milosevic did in 1991 to the Bosnians and in 1999 to the albanians.

the list can go on and on and on......

(sorri for tha spelinge)

I respect everyones opinions and I dont mean to insult but some things bother me.

Originally posted by Bout Time
Newsmax - moot, partisan

Gop USA - moot, partisan

Propagandamatrix ( at least they're honest that they're full of shyte! I like the picture of Bush on the home page with the caption "Bringing Order out of Chaos"!!

). I would like to say our ATS is a better body of research than that site!

Clinton Crimes - moot, partisan

Town Hall - moot, partisan...though "Conservatives News and Information" is kind of a catchy mission statement

CNS News - see above. "The Right News, Right Now"

Frontpage Mag - see above. Ann Coulter's article on how we are "bowing to the French" was particularly funny. David Horowitz!?!? Can you say Rigt Wing MediaWhore? I thought you could!

Even better, the link source is talking about Dick Miniter's( think Ann Coulter with a smaller Adams' Apple & Penis) piece of Yellow Journalism serealized in the WASHINGTON TIMES !?!?!

Good old Rev. Moon's piece-O-Shat!

The rest were no long available.

But overall, these types of sources are so suspect that you wonder why anyone would use them. I mean hey, it's a volume of links, but the morning after I go to the Brazilian Churoscoria all you can eat meat orgy, I'm impressed with the load in the camode.....but it's still shyte!

On this whole Blame Clinton History revisionism:

- The Saudi's were the third piece in a three way deal - the piece that held OBL. They backed out. 1996.
The whole lens that we look through now that has us acting like Israel and sanctioning pre-emptive assasinations was not in play prior to 9/11.....we were the world's Moral Leader and were obligated to not sink there.


So much for that now, we have Chickenhawks on this Board, who never wore the uniform lamenting why we weren't the Mossad under Clinton....pitiful.

Reads to me like your having a source issue day BT.

I think it would be safe to say that if one did a search on your name and looked at your sources that you have used over the past.....there wouldn't be a 'source' issue, now would there?

When the truth can't be handled, it always boils down to "source issues....




regards
seekerof

bush'es middle name's herbert
mwahahahaha
rofl
if i were to suit names to the guy, undoubtedly, i'd have called up herbert, or george, or possibly "miles" suits him...weird ai?

let a rube rule the largest super-power in the world, and undoubtedly he will be ridiculed, bet on it
at least saddam's got style, but u do have a point Reason Bush did help out "clean" terrorism, he's also decreased the world's future with oil.
funny how he hasn't spotted places like nigeria, or possibly the congo when he claimed war on terrorism
"follow the oil" in this case, i detest the man because he's made sure he'd be a benefittor, so would the rest of his crew, therefore....he's more worried about cash in hand, than lives lost, and that truly..pisses me off.
but o wait, since you've already dissed my ****ing country, and called me a stalin supporter, at least i can confidently say we dont suffer from these problems anymore.
who's got more homicide per day than any other country in the world?
who's got racial discrimination at peak-levels??

hell...who's got higher unemployment rates and people living off welfare!!!!!
u-r-so-full-of-#-it's-unreal
the ukraine huh..

well..you see, if i were to go back in history, and weed out every single crime committed by the CIA alone (JFK any1??), before that? fine...cuclus clan, far worse than any cannibalism.
at least i dont spontaenously try and mimick,
living in denial must be dull, but hey..i wont go down to your level, lout.



[Edited on 19-12-2003 by Cyrus]

nope it was clinton you marxist idoit!

Originally posted by KrazyIvan
nope it was clinton you marxist idoit!

no it was bush,
what's this joke about u being pro-american?? ur fu~cking name's Ivan...a55hole, oh wait, you're yet another immigrant:shk:
idiotta, don't come at me with disses.

seekerof your sheer brilliance never stops amazing me.

Why would Bush want to kill OBL. The Bush family and Bin laden Family histroy goes back 2 decades. Plus everything OBL does helps Bush. From 9/11 to blowing up cars while the British population was protesting Bushs vist to England.

Originally posted by Seekerof
Reads to me like your having a source issue day BT.

I think it would be safe to say that if one did a search on your name and looked at your sources that you have used over the past.....there wouldn't be a 'source' issue, now would there?

When the truth can't be handled, it always boils down to "source issues....

regards
seekerof

Please do, I openly invite anyone to review my sources when I link. Seek, the tough part is that you're set up like me to respect the rules of debate by providing the source from where your argument comes, that's to be applauded among Right Wingers who are so baren of logical thought and given to hyperbole.
But, it's not any issue of handling "truth" as it's marketed from these marginalized sources that you quote; it's about entering them into debate as if they were worthy of merit. No one thinks of any source such as Ann Coulter as worthy of merit. No one thinks a clearly partisan site is going to give unbiased looks at issues.
So the net-net? Stop trying to pass that happy horse shat off as dogma we should all tremble in the face of, and I'll stop calling you on it!

FELICE NAVIDAD!

Originally posted by Colonel

Originally posted by Russian
uuhh...

colonel i suggested something...

how about colonel you find out how much times clinton has let Bin laden go?

Waitaminit. YOU hate Clinton. YOU find out and I'll put the LIE to whatever you bring. I just bring the truth and the truth is this:

BUSH IS RESPONSIBLE FOR 9-11

That's why he is blocking queries into the 9-11 investigation and hiding 28 pages from the 9-11 report.

Bush is a mass murderer BY DEFINITION and its time people wake up and realize that.

[Edited on 17-12-2003 by Colonel]

Yer a crack head.....

BUSH IS RESPONSIBLE FOR 9-11

He is.
www.whatreallyhappened.com...

Terrorism is the oldest trick in the book to take away civil liberties and gain total control.

Originally posted by DiRtYDeViL

BUSH IS RESPONSIBLE FOR 9-11

He is.
www.whatreallyhappened.com...

Terrorism is the oldest trick in the book to take away civil liberties and gain total control.

Yer a crack head too....

Originally posted by Cyrus

Originally posted by KrazyIvan
nope it was clinton you marxist idoit!

no it was bush,
what's this joke about u being pro-american?? ur fu~cking name's Ivan...a55hole, oh wait, you're yet another immigrant:shk:
idiotta, don't come at me with disses.

so waht my "name" is Ivan. my real name is actually a pretty commn american name you ass

and the marxist idoit comment was directed at your pal colonel.


liberals, always attack the person and never the issues. #ing children. all of them.


read this you idoit!


"Dereliction of Duty: The Eyewitness Account of How Bill Clinton Endangered America's Long-Term National Security"


Air Force Lieutenant Colonel Robert "Buzz" Patterson was a military aide to President Clinton from May 1996 to May 1998 and one of five individuals entrusted with carrying the "nuclear football"�the bag containing the codes for launching nuclear weapons. This responsibility meant that he spent a considerable amount of time next to the president, giving him a unique perspective on the Clinton administration. Though he arrived at the job "filled with professional devotion and commitment to serve," he left believing that Clinton had "sown a whirlwind of destruction upon the integrity of our government, endangered our national security, and done enormous harm to the American military in which I served."

Dereliction of Duty is not a personal attack on President Clinton or a commentary on his various scandals; rather, it is a "frank indictment of his obvious�to an eyewitness�failure to lead our country with responsibility and honor." Lt. Col. Patterson offers a damning list of anecdotes and charges against the President, including how Clinton lost the nuclear codes and shrugged it off; how he stalled and lost the opportunity to launch a direct strike on Osama bin Laden at a confirmed location; how the President and the First Lady, and much of their staff, consistently treated members of the military with disrespect and disdain; and how Clinton groped a female Air Force enlisted member while aboard Air Force One, among other incidents large and small. A considerable portion of this slim book is devoted to the myriad ways in which President Clinton undermined the military, and hence the security, of the nation. He seriously questions Clinton's decisions to send troops to Somalia, Rwanda, Haiti, and Bosnia to accomplish non-military tasks without clear objectives. Having participated in each of these engagements, Lt. Col. Patterson personally "experienced the frustration of needlessly wasted lives, effort, and national prestige" as well as the alarmingly low morale that Clinton inspired.

This is certainly not the first anti-Clinton book, but it is different in that Patterson does not seem to have a political ax to grind. In fact, at times, he appears apologetic about having to write about his ex-commander in chief. Yet, in the end, this retired soldier felt his last act of service should be to share his experience with his country. --Shawn Carkonen



im pretty sure the carrier of the nuclear football would be a good person to listen to.




and i though you libs liked immigrants?

[Edited on 12-19-2003 by KrazyIvan]

Originally posted by Colonel
Tyrric, if you have nothing politcal to say to your insults, then don't say anything. Read the rules.

Oh, we have to be Political to insult?? I did not see that in the rules???

Well, there is the Pot calling the Kettle black or Uncle Tom again.......can't wait for your next tirade Herr Mod....