It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by searching_for_truth
This is a hard one.
Originally posted by searching_for_truth
This is a hard one.
Originally posted by Nygdan
Its pretty simple. Congress declared war. He joined, then, for his own reasons, decided that he didn't want to serve in iraq, but would serve elsewhere. That decision is simply not up to him. The war was not illegal. If he was in iraq and then ordered to shoot a bunch of civilians, he can refuse. And even then, there has to be an investigation. A solider also simply doesn't have the right to protest Congressionally declared wars, they are not civilians, they are government property, if they publically criticise thier commanders, all the way up to the presidency, then they can be punished under military law, military law that they themselves agreed to when they signed up.
Originally posted by searching_for_truth
(Could be the best excuse to let him get away with this one)
Originally posted by Britguy
Ideally he'd get a bullet to the skull? How very compassionate of you.
This guy has the balls to stand up for his views.
Doing what many in the military, so it seems, would like to do.
Originally posted by Nygdan
Originally posted by searching_for_truth
(Could be the best excuse to let him get away with this one)
Indeed, they should just let him go. I mean, ideally, he'd get a bullet to the skull, but realistically, its best to just say 'you don't want to be in the army, fine, leave'.
Originally posted by Agit8dChop
Wow, look at that.
Even your own justice system is finding it hard to continue the sham of Iraq and its missions being 'legal'
Lets hope this sets a tone.
The Uniform Code of Military Justice (UCMJ) 809[890].ART.90 (20), makes it clear that military personnel need to obey the "lawful command of his superior officer," 891.ART.91 (2), the "lawful order of a warrant officer", 892.ART.92 (1) the "lawful general order", 892.ART.92 (2) "lawful order". In each case, military personnel have an obligation and a duty to only obey Lawful orders and indeed have an obligation to disobey Unlawful orders, including orders by the president that do not comply with the UCMJ. The moral and legal obligation is to the U.S. Constitution and not to those who would issue unlawful orders, especially if those orders are in direct violation of the Constitution and the UCMJ
Originally posted by Nygdan
Its pretty simple. Congress declared war. He joined, then, for his own reasons, decided that he didn't want to serve in iraq, but would serve elsewhere. That decision is simply not up to him. The war was not illegal.