Magnets are a potential power source, page 1
Pages: <<  1    2    3    4  >>
ATS Members have flagged this thread 2 times
Topic started on 27-1-2007 @ 12:18 AM by conspiracymaster
now ive been thinking far out lately... according to science, no device can operate without a power source.

but what about magnets? what power source do they have? can anyone really explain the molecular properties of magnets? they exert an endless force that always stays the same and that force never drains, slows down, or stops, unlike humans or motors.

humans get tired and worn out. motors get worn out and break down. but magnets? has a magnet ever stopped working? even really weak magnets last forever, always emiting a kind of power source.

my point is if we can find a way to harness this energy or to use it as it is, but for benefit like transportation, it could very well eliminate the need for fuels. magnets could be the motors of the future, if somebody can figure out a way to use a magnets power? i know there are smart people out there. i know there is a fast way to travel without polluting everywhere you go.

related sources
Q: How can scientists be so mystified by gravity
yet also claim to explain it?
A: This is a basic conflict in our science. There is an
unspoken collective agreement in our educational institutions
to teach clearly flawed explanations since they really have no
alternative. In actuality, today’s scientists know nothing about
the true nature of gravity.


I fully believe magnets harness the energy of gravity. they work like gravity.

Gravitational Perpetual Motion:
As we all know, perpetual motion machines are impossible,
and claims of such devices are a clear sign of bad science.
No device (or natural phenomenon) can operate endlessly
without draining a power source, and certainly no device can
operate without a power source at all. Yet, our science states
that an object dropped into a tunnel cut through the Earth would
oscillate back and forth endlessly from one end of the planet
to the other. This is the result predicted by both Newton's and
Einstein's theories of gravity, yet this belief clearly violates our
most elementary laws of physics as well as common sense.
There is no claim of a draining power source, nor even any
mention of a power source at all to drive this process. Despite
detailed atomic theories and even having split the atom we
have never identified a gravitational power source.

LINK

does anybody wanna take a shot at explaining why magnets dont drain or why they arent used for things like cars?


reply posted on 27-1-2007 @ 12:36 AM by Arkangel4time
* Patent Application US 2006/0163971 (appft1.uspto.gov... n.IN.&s2=%22Magnetic+Power%22.AS.&OS=IN/Gunderson+AND+AN/%22Magnetic+Power%22&RS=IN/Gunderson+AND+AN/%22Magnetic+Power%22) (PDF (pesn.com...)) Pending; Solid State Electric Generator; July 27, 2006.

Abstract
A solid-state electrical generator including at least one permanent magnet, magnetically coupled to a ferromagnetic core provided with at least one hole penetrating its volume; the hole(s) and magnet(s) being placed such that the hole(s) penetrating the ferromagnetic core's volume intercept flux from the permanent magnet(s) coupled into the ferromagnetic core. A first wire coil is wound around the ferromagnetic core for the purpose of moving the coupled permanent magnet flux within the ferromagnetic core. A second wire is routed through the hole(s) penetrating the volume of the ferromagnetic core, for the purpose of intercepting this moving magnetic flux, thereby inducing an output electromotive force. A changing voltage applied to the first wire coil causes coupled permanent magnet flux to move within the core relative to the hole(s) penetrating the core volume, thus inducing electromotive force along wire(s) passing through the hole(s) in the ferromagnetic core. The mechanical action of an electrical generator is thereby synthesized without use of moving parts.

* Magnetic Power Inc. Patent Application Published (pesn.com...) - Patent describes a Solid State Electric Generator, the first in a series of Magnetic Power Modules™ that the company says will produce electric power with no moving parts and no need for fuel. (PESN; July 28, 2006)
* MPI Press Release (magneticpowerinc.com...), July 27, 2006



peswiki.com...:Magnetic_Power_Inc


reply posted on 2-2-2007 @ 11:49 AM by 2PacSade
Originally posted by Beer_Guy
Great topic, something I've been exploring for quite a while.
Just to clear things up though,,,, magnets do weaken over time and eventually lose their power. They aren't forever.


I think it's called degaussing, but I could be wrong. I was looking around the web about this topic and there are some really cool designs out there. Some day I firmly believe this technology will be old hat. BUT-

It ain't gonna happen until there's no black gold/Texas tea left in the ground.

The oil industry will not allow it.

We've got cars with fuel injection, variable spark advance, variable duration timing, roller valvetrains, cleaner & better burning fuels, synthetic lubricants, advanced spark plugs & wires, electronic coils with hotter & longer duration sparks, aluminum & magnesium blocks & heads, double overhead cams, and many other advances in automotive engine technology.

They come standard with 20 or 30 computers that monitor & maintain proper function of all subtending components much better that their old mechanical predecessors used to in the past and make the car much more advanced in many areas.

Cars accelerate faster, weigh less, stop quicker, steer better, park themselves, have air bags & crumple zones, drive with no oil or on punctured tires, have heated & power everything, navigate you to a destination, AND tell you everything going on in the vehicle through numerous digital displays while you listen in comfort to hi fidelity satellite radio or CD while the kids watch their favorite DVD, BUT-

Most of them still get 20 or 30 MPG just like they did 20 years ago!

( WTF squared! )

We're just starting to see models that advertise in the 40 or 50 MPG range. Why?

Because that's exactly what they are engineered to do! If the car companies were allowed to do what they are capable of doing then we would have cars that get 200+ MPG right now!

I think there's a good possibility that a perpetual motion machine has already been invented, and the plans are quietly sitting somewhere in an Exxon/Mobile safe. Not to be seen until all the oil is gone. . . Too bad-

If magnetism & gravity ARE closely related, then maybe a small singularity could prove to be a possible perpetual power source. I don't think they "degauss".

2PacSade-


reply posted on 11-2-2007 @ 09:30 PM by Infinite motion
Eh?

Sorry magnets are in no way connected to gravity.
Einstein has already explained what gravity is.

In his Equivalence principle, which states that you cannot tell the difference between a gravitational field and a equivalent uniform acceleration. So that objects in free fall under gravity all accelerate at the same amount, or in other words, they move the same way as if there was no gravity. So what seems to be the result of gravity is actually the result of curved space-time.

So therefore everything has a gravitational attraction, because everything creates a curve in space-time. But obviously we (humans) create such a small curve that we don't affect anything.
I'm sure your all familiar with the old 3D representation of curved space-time. When a bowling ball is placed on a stretched sheet of rubber, then a smaller ball is placed on the side. The smaller ball will follow the curve made by the bowling ball.

Or if you believe in the Quantum pyhsics theory of gravity it goes like this.

Gravity is a force mediated by an exchange of virtual particles.
Called the Graviton. That has the abillity to ignore the laws of pyhsics and can move faster then light, and pop into and out of existence.

See gravity explained, more or less.

Although you're right about magnetism, it is simply unexplained.

The only way i see possible to create an "energy source" from a Magnet is to pass a metal rod through a coil of magnets that in turn produces a current.
This is basically how electricity is created, although a bit more complex.
But this requires a source of external energy to create the movement of the rod.

See you can't disobey the laws of thermodynamics and energy.

Sorry for any inconsistencies in my explanation of magnetics, it's not really my field of research.

.:*IM*:.


reply posted on 11-2-2007 @ 11:44 PM by Infinite motion

I don't understand why everyone thinks Einstein should be and is 100% correct about everything he ever wrote about.


Maybe because he has proven his theory that gravity is nothing more then the visual effects of curved space-time.



Anyway, gravity and magnets are EXACTLY the same thing. I dare you to prove otherwise.


The only thing they have in common is that they attract. Otherwise they are two totally different things. A magnet still works in zero gravity, so how can gravity be the same as a magnet? If they were indeed interconnected then wouldn't a magnet fail to work in zero gravity?

I think you may think because they both attract they are somehow related!
Not so.

Sorry but there is no such thing as perpetual motion.
Bring me evidence of the possibilities for it and i may think otherwise.

I'll go over Edward Leedskalnins works.



Edit to include thoughts on Edward Leedskalnins:

Firstly there isn't much there to keep me remotely interested.

Secondly this is not a "new" science. People have know that magnets can perform strange feats, but is not perpetual motion.

Sorry still a skeptic and stick by Einsteinian theorys on realitivity, and how the perfectly explain gravity.

By the way, thanks for the link to the Castle, not sure what it has to do with the topic but fascinating.
Indeed science cannot explain everthing.

Example: Photons have no mass, yet are still affected by gravity. How if they have no mass for gravity to attract?

"The truth is stranger then fiction"

.:*IM*:.

[edit on 12-2-2007 by Infinite motion]


reply posted on 12-2-2007 @ 08:46 AM by Connected
Originally posted by Infinite motion

Maybe because he has proven his theory that gravity is nothing more then the visual effects of curved space-time.


Not really, no he hasn't proven that. You are going to believe that gravity is nothing but a "visual effect", oh wow, you are going to be stuck in a rut forever with that mentality.


Originally posted by Infinite motion

A magnet still works in zero gravity, so how can gravity be the same as a magnet? If they were indeed interconnected then wouldn't a magnet fail to work in zero gravity?


I never said anything about being "interconnected". Sorry.

A magnet creates its own "gravity". There for it works in zero g. Also, the Earth creates its own "gravity", there for it also works in zero g. The Earth is a giant magnet floating in space. If you got a giant man made magnet and put it out in space by itself, it would still work, because it creates its own "gravity" called magnetism.

I don't udnerstand your logic of a magnet failing to work in zero gravity. Just because gravtiy and magnetism are the same, doesn't mean they feed off of eachother.

You say the only simularities of a magnet and gravity is that they "attract", but that is incorrect. They also have the same exact magnetic field characteristics. They also have much more, but I cant type now, I will be late for work...

en.wikipedia.org...


Originally posted by Infinite motion
Sorry but there is no such thing as perpetual motion.
Bring me evidence of the possibilities for it and i may think otherwise.


Ok, prepare to eat your words.. Here is a Simple Overunity Device

jnaudin.free.fr...

Supposidy "overunity" is impossible. It is not.

Using this magnet ramp and a drop to escape the magnetic field, I have created a perpetual motion wheel. For ages people have been trying to find a way to close the loop with this s.m.o.t. and they have failed. Except me, I found a unique design that I will probably share within the next month, when I finish my "presentable" working model. Currently I have a makeshift, working model.

The difference between this perpetual motion device compared to others, is that it will last the lifetime of a magnet. Other perpetual motion device's are trying to use the repelling force of megnets for its perpulsion, but there is a fualt when doing that. Forcing two magnets to prepell from eachother causes them to demagnetize, and will cause they device to stop over several months.


Originally posted by Infinite motion
Edit to include thoughts on Edward Leedskalnins:

Firstly there isn't much there to keep me remotely interested.

Secondly this is not a "new" science. People have know that magnets can perform strange feats, but is not perpetual motion.

By the way, thanks for the link to the Castle, not sure what it has to do with the topic but fascinating.
Indeed science cannot explain everthing.



I don't think you read it carefully. Ed has unlocked the secrets to how the pyrimids were created. Ed created his castle by himself, with simple simple tools. He lifted and created a castle out of blocks that weighed 10 tons or more. Some blocks were 30+ tons. When he had to move his castle, he rented a truck and driver to transport the blocks. Ed told the truck driver to leave the truck at night, so he can load the blocks on the trailor by himself. People believe he levitated them with magnetic field.
Pages: <<  1    2    3    4  >>    ^^TOP^^



WWIII - USS Enterprise, a dying Legend to be the FALSE FLAG !! ??
  Posted 15 days ago with 64 member flags
A Gigantic Pyramid on Ocean Sea Floor in Bermuda Triangle?
  Posted 9 days ago with 45 member flags
"The Internal Working Components of One type of UFO".
  Posted 13 days ago with 37 member flags
A new find, is hollow Earth real?
  Posted 17 days ago with 34 member flags
Is the wind alive, a living organism? (speculative)
  Posted 19 days ago with 19 member flags