It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
posted by Justin Oldham
With all due respect, you may get your wish. I'm not sure that it'll come down as you so graphically suggest, but your point...makes my point. We'll need to agree to disagree on this one. Social justice need s to be meated out by the governed. When we allow it to be dished out by the people who govern, we risk becoming the targets of our own laws and that ultimately tempts the people in power to overstep the boundaries we set for them. this is why our votes matter so much. This why we are at such a crucial moment in our history. [Edited by Don W]
posted by Xpert111
I was referring to the fact the Bill might become so watered down that it would not serve its original purpose rather then [redefine] state rights. If Congressional leaders support a State that is refusing to secure the borders then the leaders deserve to come under fire for contributing to the existing problem. The idea isn't to move in and trample all over the states . My admin would be happy to work with the states in terms of integrating current security measures etc. [Edited by Don W]
As for how my admin will pay for this lets just say once Marijuana becomes legalized it can be taxed. Licences to sell and grow Marijuana can also be sold. As for reforming the Federal agencies the goal is to improve them so that they will be able to do the jobs without increase in the Federal bureaucracy . . people who do not meet the [immigration] requirements but still wish to become US citizens may be given the chance to serve in the US military. By serving in the US military a person has given a service and proven there loyalty to the US. What is un-patriotic about people who are willing to put there life on the line in order to gain US citizenship? [Edited by Don W]
posted by Justin Oldham
I'd like to show you just how easy it can be for people to talk about draconian measures. Cadres and internment camps are only "verboten" so long as we insist that they are.
posted by Justin Oldham
Your point is well made, but I just wanted to demonstrate by using somebody else's words just how easy it can be to justify some of the more extreme things that worry me.
Originally posted by antar
Cross between Hitlers Youth idea and the ccc camps? I wonder about the selective service that my children are going to have to sign up for in a few years. I did "OPT OUT" though I doubt it will make a difference.
posted by Justin Oldham
posted by antar
Cross between Hitler’s Youth idea and the CCC camps? I wonder about the selective service that my children are going to have to sign up for in a few years. I did "OPT OUT" though I doubt it will make a difference.
The Selective Service is a conscription board, and as such wouldn't have any power to indoctrinate. The cadres, as we will come to know them, will be civil service organizations that will indoctrinate by use of clever standards of conduct and standardized operating procedures. It's worth noting that while many of the most well-known cadres employed specific educative programs, their modern counterparts will tend to be more bureaucratic in nature. The easiest way to create a cadre is to foster loyalty to the group. Anyone can do this. Even I have my own "posse" that grows with the passing of each month. [Eddied by Don W]
posted by Justin Oldham
Pres. Bush went before a joint session of Congress to give his 2007 State of the Union address. As expected, he called for an increase in the size of the U.S. military . “. . we can add to the ranks of our military - so the Armed Forces are ready for all the challenges ahead . . I ask Congress to authorize an increase in the size of our Army and Marine Corps by 92,000 in the next five years.“ [Edited by Don W]