It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by mikellmikell
Don't get me started! As someone who hires and fires I have quit hiring some groups because it's easier to avoid problems than deal with them.Should be enough said but it's not. The last laborer I had made 18$ per hour and missed 56 working days last year and then got mad because he didn't get any raises. I told him you keep missing time your ovdiously not here for the money. 4 working days later he called me and said he would be in the middle of next week. I told him human Recources cleaned out his desk and took his computer the day before. He blew up and made threats. DUHHH!!! Go to work!!! what part of that don't people understand!!!
AAAHHHHHH!!!!
mikell
Probably the least racist white man you ever met.
Originally posted by hotpinkurinalmint
Sorry, I hate to knock you off your politically correct high horse, but a lot of White people feel uneasy about Black people. This is not to say these people are all bad, but rather they have been conditioned to feel that way. If virtually every white person had no qualms with minorities, why would are so many white people putting themselves through hellish commutes just so they can live in lilly white suburbs miles away from where they work?
Originally posted by American Madman
How about the fear of whitey and cops? Most people do not trust people they don't know black or white. Minority/Majority
A person might be afraid of "their opinion" rough looking people black or white.
Whereas they might not be afraid of "their opinion" civil looking people black or white.
People swat at bumble bees too, not that they are any threat. People react to percieved threats sometimes they are white sometimes they are black.
Originally posted by hotpinkurinalmint
First, I think you should be aprreciated for your candor. It is needed and contributes to this debate. The wonderful thing about the internet is someone like you can speak candidly without fear of reprisal.
I will not label you anything, as the "racist" label is too loaded, and the evils it represents do not apply to a person such as yourself. At the end of the day, you are a probably good person who is doing what you think is best for yourself and your family. You probably do not advocate enslaving all the minorities, or ethnicaly cleansing them, or any other atrocities, thus it would be unfair to compare you to KKK members, Nazis, and other like people.
What I do question is how you evaluated the risks. Perhaps when you weighed the pros and cons of moving to the exurbs, the cons of living within earshot or gunshot of minorities was given too much weight. Perhaps this was fueled by the strereotyupe of the Minority thug we are constantly bombarded with in the media. We should all question how the stereotype is created, and how and why it is presented?
Originally posted by American Madman
Originally posted by hotpinkurinalmint
Sorry, I hate to knock you off your politically correct high horse, but a lot of White people feel uneasy about Black people. This is not to say these people are all bad, but rather they have been conditioned to feel that way. If virtually every white person had no qualms with minorities, why would are so many white people putting themselves through hellish commutes just so they can live in lilly white suburbs miles away from where they work?
Because the inner city sucks to live in. Thats a fact. Unless you are rich and live in the Good safe clean area watch your car watch you wallet protect your assests. That is not predjudice that is fact. Here is another fact poor people come in different flavors. There are plenty of poor white people. The inner city isn't populated exclusively by black people.
As for your lily white comment thats pretty racist.
I live 15 minutes from the BROnX in NY. I've been their I've seen it. When I was thirteen I took the train to buy pot their, because in the lily white communities its harder for kids to get drugs, so we go to the ghetto because they don't care.
Trash comes in all colors.
Originally posted by hotpinkurinalmint
I lived in a variety of areas, from the inner city, to the suburbs. The city is not all bad. It is interesting and stimulating. What a lot of people who live in exurbs (outer suburbs) are not realizing is that their kids are turning out worse than they would have if they grew up in the city because their kids are bored, and have nothing better to do than get drunk or high. Unfortunatley, kids today are not just drinking and/or smoking weed, but have access to crystal meth, which is highly destructive.
Originally posted by brill
Originally posted by hotpinkurinalmint
Well to be honest the media no doubt is a factor. I know enough to read between the lines and yes the media does portray minorities in a demoralizing fashion. However statistics are there aside from the media and those do clearly indicate a growing problem so I don't think stereotyping is the concern. Is that the fault of minorities? Perhaps not but in most cases I see very little at a grassroots community level to better the situation. Everyone says it has to start somewhere and I think from within the respective minority communities is the key.
Just to add part of my evaluation involved being in situations firsthand. Situations that, to me, had no positive gains or outlook only trouble. In fact one was life threatening involving a minority. Does that put all minorities under the same umbrella ? Certainly not, but it simply re-enforced what I already thought I knew.
brill
[edit on 4-1-2007 by brill]
[edit on 4-1-2007 by brill]
You are correct in that the statistics are not colorblind. A black person is more likely to have gone to prison than a white person, a white person is more likely to go to college than a Black person. I just question what weight you give those statistics and your analysis of them.
First, your understanding of the statistics might be wrong. For example, violent crime peaked in the 80's. Their is less violence today, then 20 years ago. Similarly, child abductions are lower in number today, then they were 20 years ago, its just that these child abduction stories are getting more attention.
Secondly, are you giving up a lot of the benefits of urban living for a 1 in 10,000 chance of getting shot for a 1 in 20,000 chance of getting shot and a 1 in 10 chance of getting pick pocketed for a 1 in 50 chance of getting pick pocketed? I do not know the specifics of your particular situation, but there are people like you who are suffering miserably during long commutes and giving up career opportunities just for a decreased risk of something that is not a major problem to being with.
Originally posted by hotpinkurinalmint
We would both agree that a Black person who is impeccably dressed, speaks eloquently, and is clean, like Sydney Poirtier cut will be viewed by many as not rough looking, while a White person who looks like a stereotypical Hell's angel would be viewed as rough looking.
An interesting thought experiment would be what we can do to the Black person to make him rough looking, and what we can do to the Hell's angel to make him look non-rough looking. For example, if we gave tthe Hell's angel a haircut or removed his tattos, would he become non-rough looking. Let us take Sydney Poirtier. If we gave him a tattoo, or corn roes, or took off his suit, would he then become rough looking. My guess is that if we ran this experiment, it would only take a few minor changes to make Sydney Poirtier rough looking in the eyes of many, and it would take a few minor changes to make the Hell's angel to make him not rough looking. From a purely color blind perspective, these two men would be on opposite sides of the spectrum. Yet, since it would take to just a few minor changes to make them both equal on a scale of "roughness," it suffices to say that race plays a large part in determining whether someone looks threatening.
Originally posted by brill
Originally posted by hotpinkurinalmint
I
Not so sure about that. I don't think it matters big city or small rural town. What matters is who and what kids are exposed to as typically dictated by their peers. However this is way off the main topic so I'll quit while I'm ahead.
brill
[edit on 4-1-2007 by brill]
The peer group is influenced by its environment, though. A group of kids who live in Alaska may decide to walk around with red scarves, following their group's fashion. The fact they are wearing red scarves, as opposed to blue, white, or any other color may be a function of the group, but the fact they are wearing scarves is a function of their environment. That same group of kids may not even own scarves if they lived in Florida or California. Similarly, a group of kids living in a bland, sterile exurb will behave differently than if they were transported to an urban environment.
Originally posted by hotpinkurinalmint
Originally posted by brill
Not so sure about that. I don't think it matters big city or small rural town. What matters is who and what kids are exposed to as typically dictated by their peers. However this is way off the main topic so I'll quit while I'm ahead.
brill
[edit on 4-1-2007 by brill]
The peer group is influenced by its environment, though. A group of kids who live in Alaska may decide to walk around with red scarves, following their group's fashion. The fact they are wearing red scarves, as opposed to blue, white, or any other color may be a function of the group, but the fact they are wearing scarves is a function of their environment. That same group of kids may not even own scarves if they lived in Florida or California. Similarly, a group of kids living in a bland, sterile exurb will behave differently than if they were transported to an urban environment.
Originally posted by hotpinkurinalmint
Racism in employment is actually exacerbated by anti-discrimination laws. It is very difficult to fire a Black person in America. If you fire a Black person for any reason, no matter how justified you were in firing him or her, he or she will have a prima facie case against you in court, meaning the burden of proof will be on you the employer to prove you did not fire them for racist reasons.
This being said, a lot of companies will put Black people in positions where there performance will be irrelevant, like bureacratic departments. That way, if the person is underperforming, the company will not be severely harmed if the person underperforms. If Black people are put in positions where there performance is critical to the success of the company, and the person underperforms, the company will not be fire and replace the worker easily.
Originally posted by Realtruth
Also in our November elections Affirmative Action was banned State wide overwhelmingly, which I think is a good thing. People should get jobs and positions based on merit not skin color.
[edit on 4-1-2007 by Realtruth]
Originally posted by hotpinkurinalmint
Today's racism is highly pervasive, but more subtile. For example, virtually all white people have a fear of Black people they do not know. They may feel the Black people they know are alright, but they are affraid of strange Black people. They will clutch their purse tighter when a Black person they do not know is in the same elevator as them. White people are ashamed to admit they have these attitudes, but as many people of color will attest, this is true.
The reason why these attitudes exist is that they are implanted in people to control them. Fear of Black people and other minorities drives people to do strange things.
Originally posted by hotpinkurinalmint
Racism is alive and well in America.
Today's racism is highly pervasive, but more subtile.
For example, virtually all white people have a fear of Black people they do not know.
They may feel the Black people they know are alright, but they are affraid of strange Black people.
They will clutch their purse tighter when a Black person they do not know is in the same elevator as them.
White people are ashamed to admit they have these attitudes,
but as many people of color will attest, this is true.
Fear of Black people and other minorities drives people to do strange things. They buy homes in far away suburbs to avoid minorities,
Originally posted by Political Veto
Great post Realtruth.
Originally posted by Realtruth
Also in our November elections Affirmative Action was banned State wide overwhelmingly, which I think is a good thing. People should get jobs and positions based on merit not skin color.
[edit on 4-1-2007 by Realtruth]
Maybe off-topic somewhat, but I'm not willing to eliminate all forms of affirmative action until universities stop dishing out preferences for legacies (daddy attended so daddy's boy gets preference). This is a clear advantage based on social status.
Originally posted by Realtruth
PV,
Off the topic maybe, but in my opinion no because the rich, affluent will always get the top spots in any college they wish, period, whether or not affirmative action is there. Grades don't matter for them only that their daddy has enough money to make donations to get them in, anywhere.
What affirmative action does, in a school situation, takes smart kids, in an equal situations, from poor families, of different colors and pits them against each other, the ones that have the affirmative action on their side get in.
Now is that fair? It is the same or worse in corporate america. I have seen it first hand devasate a working environment in General Motors. A female hispanic was given a top position at one of the local automotive plants based on AA, and not qualifications and there where individuals that had much more experience, credentials, years in and wisdom for the job. This women made a huge mess of things, but no one could say a thing. Individuals that were in positions for the job were passed over, some quit, some asked for transfers. It breaks the will of those that work hard and are loyal. If a person of color or gender deserves a position then by all means they deserve it, but not by force this only brings hatred and anynomosity for people that truly pay their dues by hard work and loyalty.
RT