 |
|
Topic started on 12-11-2002 @ 05:43 PM by GhostMan
|
dol you use mac or PC?
|
reply to this post:
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 12-11-2002 @ 05:47 PM by William
|
iBook, 700MHZ, 640 RAM, Combo-Drive, OSX.2.1 Jaquar
This think is a little pocket-rocket... I love it.
|
reply to this post:
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 12-11-2002 @ 06:14 PM by Quicksilver
|
booooo down with mac PC FOREVER
haha hah aha
[Edited on 13-11-2002 by Quicksilver]
|
reply to this post:
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 12-11-2002 @ 06:56 PM by James the Lesser
|
Um, I use a freak machine. Me and a freind put it together. It has parts from a bunch of different computers. But I would guess PC over mac. The
library uses mac, they suck. Owens uses PC, they great.
|
reply to this post:
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 12-11-2002 @ 07:02 PM by Quicksilver
|
nothin wrong with Macs but PC's are superior But Linux is the best but thats alil different
|
reply to this post:
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 12-11-2002 @ 10:26 PM by Byrd
|
PC -- 7 or 8 of them.
|
reply to this post:
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 12-11-2002 @ 11:23 PM by troylawson
|
Macs are ok for grandma and grandpa, children and the mechanically reclined(un-inclined?). These are the same people who subscribe to AOL and eat at
Jack-In-The-Box(McDonald's competitor on the west coast). I work at the Institute and I see more PCs than Macs(1-2% are Macs)(tells you something
about what professionals think of Macs.(This is a global view as well, since these reseachers can have their pick of computers.)) Personally I have a
Borg PC(it assimilates parts into its collective). I am running a Pentium 4 1.8GHz, with 256MB RAM, and Windows XP Home Edition. It seems to be
working great! I upgraded for $275 clams. How much for a Mac upgrade? Turnaround?-Troy
[Edited on 13-11-2002 by troylawson]
|
reply to this post:
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 13-11-2002 @ 04:14 AM by ultra_phoenix
|
3 pc's at home, 1 to my office + 1 notebook.
And I'll not tellya what I think about MAC, I don't want to have new deadly ennemy on ATS.
|
reply to this post:
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 13-11-2002 @ 06:49 AM by William
|
Well, I'm happy you've deluded yourself into feeling you're superior operating within the Bill Gates evil empire... I'm sure Mr. Gates is very
proud of all of you.
I used to feel like you (somewhat), I needed 2 PC's at work... a powerful desktop and a laptop... not anymore... nope.
I sit and chuckle to myself as I work away on my iBook that has just past it's 780th hour of uptime (and I restarted 780 hours ago when I upgraded
the system software to 10.2) and never any concerns about pissing away time trouble shooting minor little nits with the OS.
Yup... you guys are da-bomb... as I sit here with PhotoShop 7, Image Ready, Bryce, Word, Excel, PowerPoint, IE, Mail, iMovie, and iTunes all running
just fine at the same time in my BSD Unix OS Kernel under protected memory on this little iBook. When I'm done, I just close the lid... and when I
get back to work I open it and BAM, instant on to all my open apps again.
Yup... you guys got it made.
|
reply to this post:
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 13-11-2002 @ 07:42 AM by quiet one
|
well i've got these two parrallel machines next door .... um ... something like 14 and 24 processors respectively. then there's the silicon
graphics just over the way, and there's an alpha box floating around here somewhere ......
 i use a pc though as standard. never had any need for the macs. occassionally use unix, but only if i have to. i hate treading on the toes of
the astro's that ~really~ use our unix system. however, all being equal, if i really want power, i ask for access to the supercomputer over in
manchester ...
- qo.
|
reply to this post:
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 13-11-2002 @ 07:44 AM by quiet one
|
btw, i never got the big fuss over the multi-tasking of unix and the likes. i happily run a full Mathematica simulation that can easily munch up 100%
CPU usage, and chat/post here on ATS, check e-mail, and listen to CDs all at the same time.
- qo.
|
reply to this post:
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 13-11-2002 @ 12:24 PM by The General
|
i wish we had jack-in-the-box here. do they still have those monster tacos? **drool**
|
reply to this post:
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 13-11-2002 @ 01:45 PM by clive
|
|
reply to this post:
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 14-11-2002 @ 11:18 PM by troylawson
|
|
reply to this post:
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 15-11-2002 @ 10:21 AM by Bob88
|
how did I miss this thread? Anyway - with out blinking - MAC's are better. It's great to see an NT-based OS marketed to the masses (win XP) - I
couldn't be happier they're ditching the 95/98/ME line. Linux is a fine OS to run on intel hardware. But with a unix core on the new MAC's you
really can't beat them. Plus, TCO is way less on MACs than PCs. I worked in a large enviroment w/ several thousand PC's and MAC's. PC's
outnumbered MAC's about 4/1. Yet support calls for the PC's outnumbered MACs probably 12 to 1 or more.
I miss the PowerPC I used to have on my desk
|
reply to this post:
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 15-11-2002 @ 11:23 AM by ultra_phoenix
|
|
reply to this post:
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 15-11-2002 @ 11:24 AM by William
|
Dude... you gotta get a new iBook... amazing pieces of consumer electronics.
|
reply to this post:
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 15-11-2002 @ 11:50 AM by Byrd
|
Yeah, but does it run Age of Empires II? I'm majorly hooked on that game right now!
|
reply to this post:
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 15-11-2002 @ 11:52 AM by William
|
yup
|
reply to this post:
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 15-11-2002 @ 04:36 PM by TheBandit795
|
Software: PC over MAC
Hardware: MAC over PC
Ease of Use: MAC over PC
Upgrading: PC over MAC
nuff said...
|
reply to this post:
copyright & usage
|
 |