It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by sardion2000
You are also ignoring an important fact. China is pretty much Dependant on the US to sell all of it cheap-ass goods to. As the USD goes down then that means the US won't buy nearly as much as it did before. The US economy is the largest in the world by an extremely wide margin. This will not evaporate overnight and a destabilized US would challenge the entire world. Taking out the worlds largest consumer country economically will have severe consequences on any economy that is a major exporter.
Dec. 18 (Bloomberg) -- The U.S. current-account deficit widened to a record $225.6 billion last quarter as the trade gap grew and the country paid more interest to overseas investors.
What are the other countries going to do though? Especially China which exports most of it's goods to the Western world? They may not want a Depression to happen and may step in to limit it to a longer Stagnation(ie a Crash Recovery cycle every 3 years or so for a decade or longer) which happened to Japan in the 90s.
Tehran lacks the freedom and transparency needed for a successful oil exchange.
By Milton Ezrati
JERSEY CITY, N.J. – If, as is widely believed, the original tales of the 1001 Arabian Nights came out of Persia, then Iran, Persia's modern successor, has just given the world yet another great fantasy: the Iranian oil bourse.
Surely Tehran lost touch with reality when it developed its plan to use a new, euro-based oil exchange, on Kish Island in the Persian Gulf, to dethrone the greenback from its position as the world's reigning reserve currency. Such a project is neither likely to attract much business nor to have Tehran's desired effect on the dollar or the United States.
Tehran's plan of attack has the virtue of economic logic at least. Iran's planners recognize that the heavy use of the dollar in international trade sustains its foreign exchange value by forcing people to hold greater dollar balances than they otherwise would. The dollar's consequent strength encourages its use in other transactions, which requires still greater dollar holdings in a dollar-boosting cycle. Iran's planners hope that their euro-based exchange will disrupt this pattern. By forcing oil traders to hold euro balances instead of dollar balances, Tehran expects the oil bourse to induce dollar selling and consequently force a drop in value. Those foreign exchange losses will draw still more trading away from the dollar, further weakening it, until, ultimately, it loses its world-leading position. Iran's planners expect to do the US great harm in this way.
This economic logic, though reasonable from a theoretical standpoint, misses some very practical hurdles to success. Tehran's exchange simply is not attractive compared with the exchanges in London and New York, where dealers and traders are prospering amid their well-developed networks. On distant Kish Island, they would: (1) lack trained locals to work in their operations, (2) have to deal with a notoriously corrupt bureaucracy, (3) lose contact with a transparent financial, regulatory, or banking system, (4) lack the necessary technological infrastructure, and (5) sever most links to the globe's electronic commercial structures on which trading relies.
Because Iran is not even a member of the World Trade Organization, dealers who move to Kish Island would also miss the kind of legal structures on which they rely to facilitate trading and secure the contracts that support it. Furthermore, a firm's move to Kish would subject any staff assigned there to Islamic sharia law. Western oil company employees tolerate that burden because they must go where the oil is. The same is not true of futures traders.
Against this list of drawbacks, it is difficult to see how such an exchange could even get started. Tehran is unconvincing with its argument that proximity to the Middle East oil fields can overcome other reservations, especially in today's electronic, information-laden world. Neither can Tehran use its oil production, as it has hinted, to force traders and dealers to its exchange. As long as Iran sells its oil onto world markets, it has no control over where it gets traded. And Iran, whatever its political agenda, simply does not have the economic and financial wherewithal to hold back its oil altogether. Petroleum amounts to 80 percent of all Iranian exports, 45 percent of the country's GDP, and 60 percent of the government's revenues. With the economy there already rickety, any shortfall in oil sales would tempt financial, economic, and consequently political suicide for Iran's current regime.
Iran's proposed bourse would also face serious diplomatic and religious problems. To work, the exchange would require a free flow of funds and oil, but Iran's membership in OPEC subjects it to strict production and sales quotas. It is not at all clear how Tehran plans to reconcile one requirement with the other. Most fundamental of all, at least for many Iranians, is the likely violation of Islamic law. The Koran forbids either paying or receiving interest; futures contracts always carry an implicit interest for the time value of money. On this basis, the bourse could pose more of a problem for relations between Iran's government and its people than for the dollar.
Even if by some miracle of legal maneuvering and commercial seduction, Tehran established its euro-based oil bourse, trading there would likely fail to move the dollar from its dominant position. Even a wildly successful Iranian exchange would have only a short-lived currency effect. Once traders and dealers had adjusted their transactions balances to accommodate the euro-based trading, they would have no reason for further dollar sales or euro purchases. Currency values would then stabilize at a new level.
Clearly, Tehran has failed to think through its bourse project thoroughly. For the time being then, such talk of dollar destruction from Tehran resembles hopes and dreams more than practice and probability. To steal a phrase from that inspired Middle Eastern thinker, Fouad Ajami, the Iranian oil bourse would seem then to fit best with the many other Middle Eastern "dream palaces."
Originally posted by infinite
China needs America, America needs China.
Originally posted by Sepiroth
America owes most of its debt to china and if 'war' ever did happen between both nations (or ties are no longer strong), china have the ability to cripple the US economy just like that *clicks fingers*.
Originally posted by NumberCruncher
In the highly UNlikely scenario that there was War between the US and China, China could not destroy the US economy because the Trillion Dollar debt would become worthless to the Chinese as America would refuse to honor a debt to a country it was at War at.
Originally posted by Sepiroth
as said lose/lose situation for america IMO, china have america at the palm of it's hand and have the ablity to clench a fist at their discretion.
Originally posted by NumberCruncher
LOL i like the Chinese but i tell you your dreaming ......
China is pretty much trusted fully by no body, at the end of the day they are a Communist nation with a shocking record of Human Rights abuses, who is going to trust this record as apposed to say the US whom has a vast array of Military and non Military treatys and alliances across the globe and close friendships with dozens and dozens of countrys.
Im not ignoring or dismissing the power that China does have, but its nothing like you beleive.
If push ever came to Shove, who is Chinas true friends? i Dont believe China has any! (yet)
Originally posted by NumberCruncher
Well thats not entirely true, the US is Chinas largest SINGLE customer purchasing about 20pc of Chinese exports, there still remains 80pc of Chinas trade to the rest of the World !!
Originally posted by Sepiroth
your missing the point, the world is 'dependent' on china (america even more so), ive gave my reasons in my first post in one key word 'trade'.
[edit on 20-12-2006 by Sepiroth]
Originally posted by NumberCruncher
China is Absolutely dependant on the rest of the World to supply it with the raw Material to allow it to manufactor these goods and build her country up.
Originally posted by DYepes
Does everyone forget that there is a little thing called NATO? Any act of war against any of its member nations is a war against all member nations, per the charter.