posted on Dec, 14 2006 @ 04:54 AM
This is a touchy subject at the best of times so I will try and keep it as "clean" as I can and deal with details. If you know what I mean?
Many people claim that it didnt happen, many claim it did but not in the way or to the extent that is publicly written. We all have heard the words
"He who wins the wars writes the history". Haven't we?
This is not to say that things didnt occur in the way that is documented, but it would benefit the winning power to have things written in a way that
supports their aims and/or past actions.
I have heard many say that if you refer to the Encyclopaedia Britannicca World Books and refer to the years throughout the war, that the Jewish
population in Germany does not diminish at all. You can conclude the meaning of that yourself but I do not have the books to refer to to back this
In "The Guardian Weekly" Newspaper 20th January 2000, at the trial of David Irving, a well known Holocaust denier, he was quoted as saying -
"Mr Irving said it was logistically impossible for millions of people to have been gassed to death. He said he believed that the Nazis had killed
between 1m and 4m Jews during the second world war, but denied that the Holocaust had been "systematic" or ordered by the Third Reich's leadership.
"The defendants will find it very hard to prove it was a Third Reich decision and an Adolf Hitler decision. There were multiple shootings, but it was
not pursuant to any programme," he added."
"Asked by Mr Rampton: "Do you deny that the Nazis killed millions of Jews in gas chambers in purpose-built establishments?", he replied: "Yes. I
deny that millions died in the gas chambers because of the logistical problems for a start."
Mr Irving said that 1m people would weigh 100,000 tonnes, and the "logistical and architectural impossibilities" in constructing extermination camps
could not be overlooked. "
It does make you think about the logistical side of things doesn't it?
There is one school of thought that I have read on the internet but dont remember wher and will try to tell you to the best of my ability that goes
along the lines as follows -
The USA was not interested in entering World War 2 and upto the start of the war had actually been financing Germanys military buildup, especially
George W.Bush's grandfather who many already know supplied machinery and equipment to the German war effort, and help to prop up their economy.
Anyway, The Jewish population within Germany wanted to have their own piece of land in the Holy Lands and approached the Brit's who up to that point
were not in a very good way in the war and told them, that they will approach the jewish lobby in the US and get them to lobby the US Government to
enter the war on the side of the british, in return the jews want their own state of Israel.
And so, the US entered the war on the side of the Brits, helped with Russia to defeat the Germans and after the war, the US and Britain helped found
the state of Israel.
Now what Revisionist claim is that yes, there were concentration camps, yes many jews, slavs, homosexuals etc died there, but not to the extent of 6
million people. That this was jazzed up and evidence fabricated to present to the UN to justify the creation of a state for the Jewish peoples.
From then on, a Holocaust "Industry" has been created that seeks to uphold these claims because they are the foundation for the creation of Israel,
and "IF" it were ever proven that the holocaust didnt happen or didnt happen to the extent Israel talks about, then Israel's opponents would
somewhat have a leg to stand ion in saying that the state of Israel was created on falsified evidence and therefore should not exist, and in a way
claim for it status as a nation to be relinquished.
Yes, I know many will disagree, but I am just stating what I have read/heard of/ and seen.
Anyway, like the original author said, lets keep this clean and not get into racial slander and abuse for I beleive the ATS moderators would have non