It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by Ed Littlefox
There are far more than a couple of Choices on how this may be done. Another one of them is the formation of an NGO non-profit corp with the powers of strict Oversight on SS, and possibly VA, funds--based in either the Perot Plan or some other sound practice. I feel that such an NGO could be structured such that each "investor" --yourselves--- is also a co-owner and has a Vote in what goes on with the corp and the funds, how they are invested at a profit for all concerned, etc. Such as this would completely remove Government manipulation of that funding and make the system solvent.
Just another Idea--what do you think?
Originally posted by Mdv2
I am aware of your opinion and you are of mine, but can you give one example of a prominent person in history that expected the US economy to collapse, for instance an ex-Comptroller General?
posted by Ed Littlefox
To begin, I am a Disabled War Vet . . Disability Benefits are NOT a Gov't giveaway . . one has to qualify under strict rules. The "other side" of this is neither is Social Security. The buzz is that, either way, we all earned it. In my case, I never expected or desired to "retire" at the age of 54, and you can bet that having to change your entire life 180 is not easy.
Ross Perot in a interview on NBC . . SS funds [are] nothing but an I.O.U. Ross was advocating Privatization. So do I, but not in the way that has been stated previously in this discussion. Just another Idea--what do you think? [Edited by Don W]
Originally posted by RetinoidReceptor
US will set up a new currency backed up by all the gold in the Federal Reserve and that will become the New World Order currency
posted by marg6043
posted by Ed Littlefox
“ . . form a NGO with powers of Oversight on SS and VA funds based on some sound practice . . such NGO be structured so each "investor" is a co-owner and has a Vote in what goes with the funds, how they are invested at a profit for all concerned, etc. Such as this would completely remove Government manipulation of that funding and make the system solvent.
I will be for private investment accounts . . The problem is that the idea of Perot was turned not into something to benefit the people but to also reap huge profits and benefit the banking system that was to make the bids for a program like that . . our present system wants all or nothing, meaning that people will have no choice as to who will manage their accounts but also in what it will chose invest. Profits will accrue for the benefit of the people managing [do you mean “owning?”] such accounts. [Edited by Don W]
Originally posted by donwhite
I disagree Subz, that your conclusion follows on your premise. I think this is a case of the “missing middle.” I also believe your reference to “big government” is misplaced. I usually think of the Fed as being part and parcel of the movement that resulted in the 16th Amendment and the essential changes in our nation’s financial policy.
Originally posted by donwhite
Profits will accrue for the benefit of the people managing [do you mean “owning?”] such accounts. [Edited by Don W]
The greedy bankers, Wall Street hustlers and GOP haters of SS since 1935, took advantage of this report and here we are today, blithely talking about taking a sure thing and handing it over to guys who got you and me into Iraq and threatens to get us into Iran. WOW!
[edit on 10/29/2006 by donwhite]
Tell me about it, and then the master mind of the SS reform is somebody that not only is managing our nation into economic oblivion but also could not even manage his own checkbook and personal business affairs.
posted by Sepiroth
posted by RetinoidReceptor
US will set up a new currency backed up by all the gold in the Federal Reserve and that will become the New World Order currency
The New World Order currency is already here, 'the euro' that’s what is damaging the US$dollar in the first place. [Edited by Don W]
Originally posted by donwhite
Gold? As currency? Not really. Beautiful. Nearly indestructible. King Tut’s head mask was brilliant after lying in the ground 3,500 years! Gold artifacts found off Florida’s coast looks as if it came out of a jewelry store even though it was under water since the 1500s.
Originally posted by donwhite
Paper money OTOh, is perfect for commerce. Fiat money. Money based on faith. And on good fiscal management of the nations printing it.
Originally posted by donwhite
The US dollars in print total about $400 billion. $240 billion is used in America, $160 billion is used outside the US. That is as close to a world currency as you will ever get. The US dollar is “backed’ by a $12 T. economy. The US is stable. That is why the US dollar is accepted around the world.
Originally posted by subz
The answer lies in a silver standard. Fiat money is far too prone to manipulation and exploitation.
Originally posted by RetinoidReceptor
Um you do realize that silver is rarer than gold? So why is the answer a silver standard? If anything, it would be a bimetallism standard or something along those lines.
That is incorrect.
16,600 metric tonnes of silver were produced in 2000.
By contrast 2,604 metric tonnes of gold were produced in 2004.
Gold is currently worth 50x the price of silver, which reflects the much rarer nature of gold.
Consider that silver is actually rarer than gold – there is less of it above ground, and because silver is used as an industrial commodity, it is barely recoverable, unlike gold.
posted by RetinoidReceptor
Consider that silver is actually rarer than gold – there is less of it above ground, and because silver is used as an industrial commodity, it is barely recoverable, unlike gold. www.moneyweek.com...
Though silver is found deep in the earth more than gold is. Like I said, I think Bimetallism is the answer.
Originally posted by donwhite
So silver is likely to become even rarer as stockpiles deplete. Yet it seems that nobody knows this: gold is currently priced as if it were the rarer metal. “That should get your juices flowing.”
www.moneyweek.com...
I did not know this. Thx, Mr R, for up-dating my knowledge base.
posted by subz
posted by donwhite
Gold? As currency? Not really.
“ . . he's talking about a gold standard, not physical gold coinage. The idea is sound in principle but as you allude to, the supply of gold is far too scarce for today’s hyper inflated prices. The answer lies in a silver standard. Fiat money is far too prone to manipulation and exploitation. Just look at how over inflated prices are today compared to 20 or 30 years ago. Inflation, yes, but these prices? [Edited by Don W]
The Federal Reserve prints the US currency and the United States government buys it from the privately owned bank at interest.
I don’t mean to pick on your posts but this is outrageous. The World had no choice in accepting the US dollar as the quasi-world currency. Since WW2 the United States has actively foisted the US dollar as the premiere currency . . “
I remind you that Saddam Hussein openly spoke of creating an Oil bourse using Euro's [only] a couple of months before the US-led invasion? The same applies to Iran who is currently in the process of creating a similar bourse.
“ . . the United States economy is far from stable, that's why despite it's continued stranglehold on oil transactions, countries far and wide including American allies are dumping large percentages of their American dollar holdings.
posted by Ed Littlefox
This is why any form of privatization needs to be something that is investor-run and in the form of a co-op on the order of, say, REA. In such a case, you hire your own people and get the Govt out of the picture. Otherwise, and the risk is having a Govt agency run with all of the effectiveness of FEMA