It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by ferretman2
I think a more appropriate question which pertians to this thread is:
What constitutes tourture?
Originally posted by stanstheman
Originally posted by ferretman2
I think a more appropriate question which pertians to this thread is:
What constitutes tourture?
Well after being threatened by an OP with wearing one of their pairs of panties on my head, I would still have to say that panties on the head is not torture.
Originally posted by 11Bravo
Originally posted by stanstheman
Originally posted by ferretman2
I think a more appropriate question which pertians to this thread is:
What constitutes tourture?
Well after being threatened by an OP with wearing one of their pairs of panties on my head, I would still have to say that panties on the head is not torture.
For the record stan, I dont wear panties, I wear boxers, and there is not one person here that could wear them on thier face for even one hour and then tell me thats not torture.
So rubbing somebodys face in feces isnt torture? Draping a blood soaked, urine soaked feces coverd cloth on a mans face isnt torture? Like i said, wear my drawers on your face for a day then tell me its not torture.
The chicken-hawks are always so fast to advocate torture or to try and blur the lines of interrogation and torture. THey are two different things,
True americans, ney true CHRISTIANS despise torture in all its forms.
Saying some torture is ok is like saying some rape is ok.
Originally posted by 11Bravo
You reap what you sew. You get what you give.
What goes around comes around.
Originally posted by magicmushroom
Seeker, have you heard the phrase two wrongs dont make a right, just because terrrorists/extremists act like savages does not mean we have to stoop to their level. Civilised countries should set the standards for others to follow otherwise we are no better than them.
Originally posted by stanstheman
Originally posted by 11Bravo
You reap what you sew. You get what you give.
What goes around comes around.
I disagree with you there.
Originally posted by stanstheman
Originally posted by Strangerous
Hmm who do I believe - the most respected broadcaster in the World or Seekerof?
The BBC? You're kidding right? In the world? Please tell me you're pulling my leg! Ohhh I get it, you were using that ol' English wit to be absurd!
Originally posted by Seekerof
Lets try some reverse logic here since it is apparent that you, as with others, appear to be protecting those "terror suspects," you know, the ones that "havent been proven guilty hence suspect":
Originally posted by Strangerous
Originally posted by stanstheman
Originally posted by Strangerous
Hmm who do I believe - the most respected broadcaster in the World or Seekerof?
The BBC? You're kidding right? In the world? Please tell me you're pulling my leg! Ohhh I get it, you were using that ol' English wit to be absurd!
Name one then! Be very interested in your views and reasons.
Originally posted by Seekerof
Let me give you a historical example to refute that notion of "civilized," k?
The Roman Empire was the most "CIVILIZED" empire/nation/country at that time and because they played by the rules of "civilized countries should set the standards for others," they were ultimately defeated and/or overcome and overrun by UNCIVILIZED barbarian tribes. Do you know what followed the fall of the Roman Empire? Europes 'Dark Ages'.
Originally posted by Seekerof
Let me give you a historical example to refute that notion of "civilized," k?
The Roman Empire was the most "CIVILIZED" empire/nation/country at that time and because they played by the rules of "civilized countries should set the standards for others," they were ultimately defeated and/or overcome and overrun by UNCIVILIZED barbarian tribes. Do you know what followed the fall of the Roman Empire? Europes 'Dark Ages'.
Originally posted by Seekerof
It has been said that to fight fire you have to resort to fighting it with fire (ie: fight fire with fire). My thoughts are along the same lines: if the only thing that gets these terrorists and fanatical nuts thinking twice is having the same tactics they utilize used against them, then so be it.
Sorry but we dont fight fire with fire anymore.
We dig ditches to fight wildfires and use water and other agents.
How about we dont do things to make people want to commit terror against us? I dont see the Swiss getting attacked
Only countries that are supporting Isreal, only countries that are running over other countries and placing dictators so our corporations can profit. That is what creates terror.
We can stop terror right now. We have shown we are strong and can throw our weight around. How about we admitt we have been wrong in the past and start working to make it a better world?
How about we stop supporting Isreal? Pull out of the mid east and let them know we will do what it takes to help them keep there sovereignty? Why dont we be a real humanitarein nation?
let them know we will do what it takes to help them keep there sovereignty?
Why dont we be a real humanitarein nation?