It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by timeless test
Well, to the extent that the evidence could not prejudice security, safety or any future legal action I couldn't agree more.
However, if anyone thinks that the retained evidence is going to stop all the arguments even if it is released I fear they would be severely disappointed.
Originally posted by LeftBehind
Weren't you just talking about baiting in another thread?
I personally believe that they let it happen on purpose, so I don't know where you get off with this back up the government unmovably bs.
I think that yes they should probably release the tapes, if in fact there are tapes with better images of the plane.
Do I think it really matters?
No, because the vast majority of the evidence points to a Boing Jet hitting the pentagon, and practically zero evidence exists that points to anything else.
I think this is a non issue that takes precedence over what I think are the real conspiracies of that day. I imagine that a few people on top allowed the attacks to happen without realizing the scale of damage. I think that all this nonsense about bombs and uavs hitting the pentagon distracts from what might be the actual conspiracy that happened that day.
And the saddest part is, that even my mildly conspiratorial stance will be swept under the rug with holographic planes, and a flying nun hit the pentagon theories.
BTW, before you mock people for having the courage to debate their stance, no matter how unpopular it might be here, you should look into actually taking a stance on any of these issues.
How brave of you to mock us when you won't even say what your stance is so that others can discuss it.
[edit on 14-9-2006 by LeftBehind]
Originally posted by LeftBehind
Weren't you just talking about baiting in another thread?
Originally posted by LeftBehind
I think that yes they should probably release the tapes, if in fact there are tapes with better images of the plane.
Originally posted by LeftBehind
And the saddest part is, that even my mildly conspiratorial stance will be swept under the rug with holographic planes, and a flying nun hit the pentagon theories.
Originally posted by LeftBehind
BTW, before you mock people for having the courage to debate their stance, no matter how unpopular it might be here, you should look into actually taking a stance on any of these issues.
Originally posted by LeftBehind
How brave of you to mock us when you won't even say what your stance is so that others can discuss it.
Originally posted by Astygia
No, for me, it's the human element that I can't dismiss. I posted something like this a while ago. There would be hundreds of people, maybe even thousands, who participated in a cover-up of this magnitude. Some police and firemen would have to be in the know, plus all the government officials, the family members, and the "witnesses". The NSA couldn't keep their wiretapping thing under wraps for what, five years? And this (9/11) would involve a whole hell of a lot more participation, which greatly increases the likelyhood of leaked information.
Originally posted by Slap Nuts
Why do you think it is OK for the FBI, NIST and FEMA to withold the photos, videos, computer models and physical evidence regarding WTC 1, 2, 7 and the Pentagon in violation of the Freedom of Information Act?
Originally posted by Astygia
poking holes in the official story doesn't automatically make another story true by default.
Originally posted by Astygia
Anyway, regarding releasing everything to the public, there is absolutely no reason why this shouldn't be done
Originally posted by shanti23
A very small faction could have carried out the 9/11 attacks, in fact the official story states that a small faction of terrorists carried out the attacks. What makes you think that large numbers of people are involved?
People, in general, will believe what they are told and if they are not on a 'need to know basis', then they don't need to know.
The NSA exists to wiretap, it is no surprise that they do so without warrants.
Originally posted by Astygia
The bold part is exactly why I believe that. It only takes a handful of people to hijack 4 planes. . .
Originally posted by timeless test
Well, to the extent that the evidence could not prejudice security, safety or any future legal action I couldn't agree more.
However, if anyone thinks that the retained evidence is going to stop all the arguments even if it is released I fear they would be severely disappointed.
Originally posted by GradyPhilpott
...even if every bit of evidence was released, there would still be those who would not accept that that would be all the evidence.
Originally posted by ANOK
Originally posted by GradyPhilpott
...even if every bit of evidence was released, there would still be those who would not accept that that would be all the evidence.
Great logic! So let's not demand they release any evidence, because we might not believe it anyway
I think the 'official story' believers realy don't want any more evidence released, the 'official story' is crumbling around them everytime something new is dicovered.
There is so obviously a coverup, no matter what actual theory you believe, if you are awake you have to agree on that also.
If there is nothing to hide, then why are they hiding?
Originally posted by shanti23
All very good points Astygia, but. . .
Why are they withholding evidence from the public?
Because there still may be trials in the off chance we capture Osama (or decide to try Sheikh Khalid Muhammed) Of course there is also the other issue about the tons (literally) of evidence that will take YEARS to catalog, let alone search for FOIA requests.
Why did they destroy all the evidence at ground zero?
Sorry, but the evidence of ground zero wasnt destroyed. Unless you are speaking of some of the steel of the WTC. Of course three separate agencies tested the steel before any of it was allowed to be recycled.
Where is the security camera footage from the pentagon?
You've seen it. Why do you assume that there is more evidence that actually shows anything?
Why the NORAD stand down?
Sorry, but NORAD wasnt "stood down" that day.
Why the simultaneous tactical simulations at the time of the attack?
We run drills every flipping week in the military somewhere...
Why wasn't the president taken to a safe location?
He was in a safe location at the school. That neighborhood and the school had been searched by the Secret Service and were known safe zones at the moment. So why not let the man have a chance to make some calls before you move him?
Why were there molten pools of iron in the ruins of the WTC?
Nope, never proven. Based on a statement made by someone who wasnt even there.
Why did all three buildings fall at free-fall speed into their own footprint from random fires?
Nope, they didnt fall into their own footprints from random fires. They fell over a relatively large area after suffering massive fires and damage.
Why have the security cameras from the Sheraton Hotel and the Citgo gas station been removed?
Security cameras have been updated, but are still there.
Why was the Bin Laden family flown to safety on the day after the attack?
The Bin Laden family was gathered in one place and the FBI was allowed to interview each member they felt the need to talk to....and they left the US AFTER airline flights resumed.
Why has Bin Laden not been brought to justice?
Because we havent captured him yet.
Why was George Herbert Walker Bush meeting with Bin Laden's brother on the morning of 9/11?
Because they were both part of the Carlyle Group at the time. Of course, if George Bush was meeting with the brother in New York.....why was he stranded in CLEVELAND that day?
Originally posted by ANOK
Great logic! So let's not demand they release any evidence, because we might not believe it