The Omega Agency

I was reading "The Omega Agency" article (I am reading all the articles I can) and I found something that I think should be rephrased.



I know that for the average US citizen, a "communistic-type government" may be a synonym to a "full control government", but seeing that communism is a ideology that has nothing to do with this type of government, should that phrase remain as it is or should it be changed to something else?

That is or was the proper term at the time, and was understood for the use. To change such would take away from the context, it wouldn't make any difference I say. Leave it as is, the changing of things is how we got into these messes to begin with.

It is repreenttive of it's time, we can relate to it even though the details are not exact, they are close enough are they not. Perhaps instead of trying to change what was, we ought to be makeing changes on what is.

[edit-spelling]

[edit on 23-8-2006 by ADVISOR]

OK, I just wanted to be sure it was OK as it is.

Meanwhile, I found that one of the links on the "Related Articles" section, the "DarkGovernment Data Page", has an almost exact copy of this text, one of the differences being that the dates.

The "DarkGovernment Data Page" has:



The "tinWiki" page has:


All the rest of the text looks like received a similar treatment, so this page looks more like a "corrected" copy of the "DarkGovernment Data Page".

Is this correct?

I'm not exactly sure, could you provide source links for both sites?
If I am not mistaken it does seem as though you may be correct.

OK.

The tinWiki article.

The DarkGovernment Data Page article.

The Omega Agency article was originally part of the ATS archive content I believe, and was moved from the archive to the tinwiki. However it appears to have received several edits since it was originally moved, so it is hard to say if the original source was here or dark government. I am certain though, that the article was not copied from the external source directly to the tinwiki. So in this case perhaps if the two are so similar, we can replace the dark government link with something else?

Archive Link: www.abovetopsecret.com...

I can comment on one aspect of the story...

it wasn't common knowledge that Bush even was in the CIA in the early vietnam era...
so normally that would be a tell tale of a hoax...
BUT!

while doing research for a related story (see sig)
I came across a very obscure piece of evidence that Bush had signed for an operation in the CIA several years before he officially was director there...

so, it proved that he secretly (and in a secret capacity) worked for the CIA during the late vietnam years and further, he worked in the field of establishing a covert drug smuggling operation to fund various black ops around the world...

(during this time, his son GW was often sent out to assess central american greenhouses for a "international greenhouse investment firm") Hummm

it was also during the time that GW was AWOL from his national guard position, as it is hard to attend classes, and assess investments for CIA- opps "private investment firm" in Costa Rica at the same time... (you always wondered how the AWOL got covered up didn't ya?)
some will also note that this was when most of GW's supposed Coke parties took place...
is it all fitting together yet?

the vietnam drug connection

and here is a witness who has gone so public, as to give all his evidence, and offer of testimony if ANYONE will even try...
bush with CIA all the way back to bay of pigs...

so the small bit that i can verify adds some to this speculation...

although i have trouble thinking that either side really is ok about giving freedoms to the people...