There are a number of arguments for and against.
OK, my questions on the theories put forth in some of the posts are:
>
The Asteroid Belt is made up of primordial objects left over from the formation of the Solar System that never coalesced into a
planet.
Then why is this belt only between Mars and Jupiter? Why are there no similar configurations in the Solar System? Primordial objects must have
been all over the place, which should have formed more asteroid belts with varying densities at the right distance from the sun.
>
A comet collision would leave a crater, but would not release enough energy to destroy the planet.
What do we know about the size of collision or the energy released due to an indigenous event
millions or a billion years ago?
>
I don’t even think there is enough matter in the belt to produce a planet.
It is possible that much of the matter has drifted away or ejected at great velocity after the event, escaping the gravitational pull of the sun.
>
The gravity of Jupiter did not allow the planetoids to coalesce into a planet
If that was so then Jupiter’s gravity should have captured all the asteroids into its own orbit.
Edited to reduce bolding
[edit on 19-8-2006 by masqua]