NWO Probably not that bad

This article has probably been mentioned before, but i just read it and thought to myself, if it actually comes to this..It won't be THAT bad. IF it is as this article states it will be..maybe the OMEGA Agency is just what we need, one planet, if you think about it, it is inevitable..when it is agreed by ALL governments and admitted to the public at large that Aliens from other planets do exist it will be called for BY THE PEOPLE OF EARTH to create a world government to represent us in some kind of galactic federation..hell the NWO is probably ALREADY doing just that right now....
The article
I will probably cop heaps for this ..but...
!!!!!BRING ON THE NWO!!!!!

Hey Im sure the Jews in Auswitz thought the same thing, before they were put in Auswitz...

Who we going to get to be president of earth? The Bush twins?

well thast the thing..if it is run by this omega group as opposed to a president then there is some kind of governmental process, and as with all governments you will have the good politicians and the bad. But if you go by the movies that have been made dealing with the future or earth having space travel capabilities (star trek for a basic example) there is a world government and it has a figurehead..i/e a president..surely that president has to be elected..I did not say it would be perfect but it would be preferrable to some of the ways countries are run now.
I just re-read the article..it has it's down side sure..but having the death penalty as a deterrent is good for crime rate..also if they are "culling the herd " especially of the bad criminal types then it is also a means of planetary population control.
you know..in theory, communism is an almost perfect society..utopian in some ways...democray is preferred ..why?..because WE live in a democratic society and have had it drilled into us that WE live the right way, the only way..free speech and all that..well communism should still allow free speech and thoughts etc..but it is the way it has been incorporated by the governments who deem their society will run that way where it has fallen done..not the concept of a collective itself..on one hand people want the truth about Aliens and ufo's out in the open..but on the other hand they are not perpared to deal with the concept of what will happen on this planet government wise when it does,

[Edited on 10-29-2003 by ShadowHasNoSource]

Ummm...Do you realize that part of the NWO's plan calls for reducing the strain on the Earth to support the human race by *culling about 75%-80%* of the total wolrd population? And were you also aware that *you* probably fall within that group to be eliminated? Anyone who doesn't support them or who actively opposes them will be the first eliminated...Next will be those who are either so socially-programmed to be ignorant & those who simply don't care.

So do *you* fall into one of those categories...Or do you claim to be a *part* of the NWO? After all, if you're not one of them, you'll wind up in one of those target groups for elimination.

...Oh right...That won't be so bad, will it? I guess that puts you into the last category I mentioned...

Well, it all depends on how the world would be governed. If the system would be democratic and transparent and the objectives humane, I guess it wouldn't be that bad.

The system would almost certainly be somewhat similiar to the US, ie. democratically elected senators from each country would form a "world senate" etc.

Federalism all the way, baby

I can't see the NWO being anything like a democracy.

Originally posted by elevatedone
I can't see the NWO being anything like a democracy.

How can you be so sure about that?

Can never be sure... but to me, Let's say the NWO is here.. there needs to be leaders ( a government ) I think that those in place to put the NWO into effect already have the leaders in mind, they will be appointed, probably one from every "nation" and there will be no discussion, voting on it.... we'll be told who is doing what.

but that's just my humble opinion.

The only way a unified world government could happen is if all dissenting opinion was silenced. The only currently known way to do that would be to kill everybody with a dissenting opinion. There are just too many different types of cultures, religions, political systems, and class structures across the world for everybody to agree to such a scheme willingly.

Take a look at all the blue blooded americans who got incredibly defensive and patriotic after the attacks of 09.11.01. Every single one of them would have to be killed, or at least have their minds altered. It would be the same for pretty much any country who had people opposed to changing their nationality and way of life.

Who knows? Maybe HAARP or some other control mechanism (chemtrails?) is setting us up for mind control, or perhaps population control. We won't know until its too late.

[Edited on 30-10-2003 by heelstone]

it's just like my home..


there we already have the NWO but it's called the
JWO Jen's world order..

she tells me when to eat, sleep, watch tv, play golf.. etc.
and I have to accept it....

just like the NWO will be !

Originally posted by heelstone
The only way a unified world government could happen is if all dissenting opinion was silenced.

Or if there was a global threat that would threaten our exsistence as a species. But that is very unlikely.

So after this BS is established, I guess we are all going to have to recieve a MARK in our right hand or our forhead?

F**** the NWO.

Just my thought.

Glan

If there was a one world government, it might be good because it might put an end to world wars. But the NWO leader will be a tryant, someone who is like an anti-christ and the world will be like 1984...Big brother will be watching all are moves

Originally posted by infinite
If there was a one world government, it might be good because it might put an end to world wars. But the NWO leader will be a tryant, someone who is like an anti-christ and the world will be like 1984...Big brother will be watching all are moves

Why is everyone saying that like it's the absolute truth? What concrete proof do you have that leader would be tyrant or the "anti-christ"?

Originally posted by Paradigm
Or if there was a global threat that would threaten our exsistence as a species. But that is very unlikely.

I've thought about that. All theories regarding fake or real alien invasion aside, Henry Kissenger did once talk about this very subject.

Today Americans would be outraged if UN troops entered Los Angeles to restore order. Tomorrow they will be grateful. This is especially true if they were told there was an outside threat from beyond, whether real or promulgated, that threatened our very existence. It is then that all peoples of the world will plead with world leaders to deliver them from this evil. The one thing every man fears is the unknown. When presented with this scenario, individual rights will be willingly relinquished for the guarantee of their well-being granted to them by their world government."

I don't think that this will be the case though.

Originally posted by heelstone

Originally posted by Paradigm
Or if there was a global threat that would threaten our exsistence as a species. But that is very unlikely.

I've thought about that. All theories regarding fake or real alien invasion aside, Henry Kissenger did once talk about this very subject.

Today Americans would be outraged if UN troops entered Los Angeles to restore order. Tomorrow they will be grateful. This is especially true if they were told there was an outside threat from beyond, whether real or promulgated, that threatened our very existence. It is then that all peoples of the world will plead with world leaders to deliver them from this evil. The one thing every man fears is the unknown. When presented with this scenario, individual rights will be willingly relinquished for the guarantee of their well-being granted to them by their world government."

I don't think that this will be the case though.

A faked invasion would be pretty hard to execute properly.

That speech seems quite interesting, could I have the link?

Originally posted by Paradigm
Well, it all depends on how the world would be governed. If the system would be democratic and transparent and the objectives humane, I guess it wouldn't be that bad.

Does the system in use now *look* like it will turn benevolent once world-control is acheived? The current system exists soley upon the premise that the "rulers" make profit upon pitting people against each other...How does this promote benevolent rulership in the future? Besides, such "rulership", by definition & practice, cannot possibly become any form of Democracy...Federalism is *very* closely related to Facism.

Originally posted by Paradigm
Or if there was a global threat that would threaten our exsistence as a species. But that is very unlikely.

...Or like perhaps a disintegrating environment due to the profit-mongering pollution manufacturers?...

Originally posted by MidnightDStroyer

Originally posted by Paradigm
Well, it all depends on how the world would be governed. If the system would be democratic and transparent and the objectives humane, I guess it wouldn't be that bad.

Does the system in use now *look* like it will turn benevolent once world-control is acheived? The current system exists soley upon the premise that the "rulers" make profit upon pitting people against each other...How does this promote benevolent rulership in the future? Besides, such "rulership", by definition & practice, cannot possibly become any form of Democracy...Federalism is *very* closely related to Facism.

Federalism is all about decentralizing power towards smaller units, ie. counties, state etc. It's based on the idea that a good society consists of coordination between different units of society, it's not a hierarchy as you are suggesting. The power is divided so that neither level, state or federal government, is stronger than the other. Although, the fact is that usually the states are a weaker, especially financially.

Heelstone covered it.
In order to have one world govornment, you would have to wipe out anything that was in opposition to it.

Democracy is an offensive idea to many people. One system cannot satisfy the entire planet. There is farr too much diversity. I support this right to diversity. Democracy, republics, socialism, communism, none of these are one size fits all schemes. Everyone is different.

The NWO is evil because it denies diversity. It denies dissent. Even one that appears to some as a noble and humane institution is evil and malicous to others.

World wars have been going on since man began, and will continue till we evolve or die out.