President's Veto on Stem Cell Research, page 1
Pages:
ATS Members have flagged this thread 0 times
Topic started on 19-7-2006 @ 08:25 PM by semperfortis
Here it is for all to read.

Like most people I am torn on this issue. My problem with it is the lack of empirical evidence that shows the value of the research.

Message to the House of Representatives


TO THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES:

I am returning herewith without my approval H.R. 810, the "Stem Cell Research Enhancement Act of 2005."

Like all Americans, I believe our Nation must vigorously pursue the tremendous possibilities that science offers to cure disease and improve the lives of millions. Yet, as science brings us ever closer to unlocking the secrets of human biology, it also offers temptations to manipulate human life and violate human dignity. Our conscience and history as a Nation demand that we resist this temptation. With the right scientific techniques and the right policies, we can achieve scientific progress while living up to our ethical responsibilities.

In 2001, I set forth a new policy on stem cell research that struck a balance between the needs of science and the demands of conscience. When I took office, there was no Federal funding for human embryonic stem cell research. Under the policy I announced 5 years ago, my Administration became the first to make Federal funds available for this research, but only on embryonic stem cell lines derived from embryos that had already been destroyed. My Administration has made available more than $90 million for research of these lines. This policy has allowed important research to go forward and has allowed America to continue to lead the world in embryonic stem cell research without encouraging the further destruction of living human embryos.

H.R. 810 would overturn my Administration's balanced policy on embryonic stem cell research. If this bill were to become law, American taxpayers for the first time in our history would be compelled to fund the deliberate destruction of human embryos. Crossing this line would be a grave mistake and would needlessly encourage a conflict between science and ethics that can only do damage to both and harm our Nation as a whole.

Advances in research show that stem cell science can progress in an ethical way. Since I announced my policy in 2001, my Administration has expanded funding of research into stem cells that can be drawn from children, adults, and the blood in umbilical cords with no harm to the donor, and these stem cells are currently being used in medical treatments. Science also offers the hope that we may one day enjoy the potential benefits of embryonic stem cells without destroying human life. Researchers are investigating new techniques that might allow doctors and scientists to produce stem cells just as versatile as those derived from human embryos without harming life. We must continue to explore these hopeful alternatives, so we can advance the cause of scientific research while staying true to the ideals of a decent and humane society.

I hold to the principle that we can harness the promise of technology without becoming slaves to technology and ensure that science serves the cause of humanity. If we are to find the right ways to advance ethical medical research, we must also be willing when necessary to reject the wrong ways. For that reason, I must veto this bill.

GEORGE W. BUSH

THE WHITE HOUSE,

July 19, 2006.

source :
www.whitehouse.gov...

I find a lot of wisdom in these words.

Semper

ATS associated thread : politics.abovetopsecret.com...

mod edit to use external quote code, please review this link

[edit on 19-7-2006 by DontTreadOnMe]


reply posted on 20-7-2006 @ 12:07 AM by FallenFromTheTree
Just a bit of insight into the kind of work people are doing.

www.khri.med.umich.edu...

Yehoash Raphael, Ph.D., directs the Otopathology Laboratory at the Kresge Hearing Research Institute. Dr. Raphael is The R. Jamison and Betty Williams Professor of Otolaryngology. Research interests in the lab include:

(a) repair and regeneration in the inner ear
(b) tissue engineering technologies as applied to the cochlea and vestibular organs
(c) hereditary sensorineural deafness



U-M research findings could unlock future advances in the treatment of hearing loss

Millions of people with the most common type of hearing loss — caused by aging, infections, drugs, diseases or exposure to loud sounds — are one step closer to an effective treatment, thanks to scientists at the University of Michigan Medical School.

In research published in the March 1 issue of Nature Medicine, U-M scientists used gene therapy to grow new auditory hair cells and restore hearing in deafened guinea pigs. This was the first successful restoration of auditory hair cells in an adult animal, and it made international news.
more www.medicineatmichigan.org...

For more info google "Atoh1"

[edit on 20-7-2006 by FallenFromTheTree]


reply posted on 20-7-2006 @ 12:18 AM by Nygdan
Originally posted by semperfortis
Like most people I am torn on this issue. My problem with it is the lack of empirical evidence that shows the value of the research.

Excluding, of course, the people that have been paralyzed and have nerves regenerated from stem cells, etc etc.

This is a new technology that is underfunded and legally hampered. How much money did we dump into nukes before there was a bomb? And that was entirely theoretical, that you could split an 'atom'.

I find a lot of wisdom in these words.

Bush is, simply, clueless on science. I don't want to pretend that I am some master of science or something like that, but Bush clearly isn't the 'go to guy' on science. He isnt' even sure if men evolved from a chimp-like ancestor or not, so how can anyone give any weight to his ideas about something as complex as stem cell research???

so we can advance the cause of scientific research while staying true to the ideals of a decent and humane society.

There is nothing indecent in using clumps of cells slated for destruction for research.
H.R. 810 would overturn my Administration's balanced policy on embryonic stem cell research.

There is nothing balanced about the policy. It prevents federal funding on new stem cell lines. It does nothing to stop embryos from being used, it merely means that federal funding isn't going to be given out, because he is uncomfortable with it.

A thousand years ago, it was immoral and unethical to dissect a human corpse for research. That was silly. So is this policy.
Pages:     ^^TOP^^