It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by iskander
planeman, my apologies for bugging you, but I'm VERY anxious to know if you can share Crimean SAM sites coords with me. Let me know please.
Originally posted by iskander
just posted on the helo situation, but defense systems being turned of simply can't happen. Even before the attack, CNN was reporting that Hezbollah was firing UNGUIDED Katusha rockets at Israeli ships.
Nice high ballistic trajectory, making them perfect targets, so turned off defense systems scenario just doesn't fly.
Which is even more troubling, because now everybody will be buying double the missiles they did before, and the ones that already have them (Syria/Iran) will be even boulder, allowing them greater political leverage.
Originally posted by Daedalus3
The C-701 OR the C-802 doesn't sea skim right from launch, especially the C-802.
Originally posted by Daedalus3
your Hezbollah Iran connection is kind of lop-sided because if they can smuggle in an AShCM WITH a launch platform in then hell they can get almost anything.
what's stopping them from getting decent Air defense equipment?
Originally posted by chinawhite
Also, it doesn't make much sense to turn off the phalax in fear of friendly fire
Originally posted by Daedalus3
I can vouch for the Barak-I. The Barak ELTA radar WILL pick up anything (here min length is 2.5 meters) at such heights within 20km.
BARAK is no joke
Originally posted by chinawhite
Originally posted by Daedalus3
The C-701 OR the C-802 doesn't sea skim right from launch, especially the C-802.
Darksided mentioned that the missiles came from inland instead of being fired on the coast which explains why the C-802 wasn't detected.
Originally posted by Daedalus3
I don't think that was confirmed..
How far inland?
Originally posted by chinawhite
Originally posted by Daedalus3
I don't think that was confirmed..
How far inland?
He said beirut
C'mon iskander nobody knows whether the Phalanx failed for sure. And your Hezbollah Iran connection is kind of lop-sided because if they can smuggle in an AShCM WITH a launch platform in then hell they can get almost anything.
The real question is how in blazes did Hezbollah take such a big risk by launching a AShCM at a ship that was publically known to host both the Phalanx AND the Barak. Or did they not know what they hec they were firing at except that it was definitely Israeli
Hezbollah has flown simple "Misrad-1" unmanned aerial vehicles, or UAVs, twice before, in November 2004 and April 2005. But those were reconnaissance flights, last just a couple of minutes each. And the drones were spotted fairly quickly, both times.
But, as Defense Tech noted in the Spring, the UAV had the potential to be much, much worse -- "a suicide bomber on steroids, basically."
Nehushtan said another Hezbollah radar-guided anti-ship missile hit and sank a nearby Cambodian merchant ship around the time the Spear was struck. Twelve Egyptian sailors were pulled from the water by passing ships, Brig. Gen. Noam Fieg said
Originally posted by iskander
Ioseb_Jugashvili has it right;
1) Is the range of the target increasing or decreasing in relation to the ship? The CIWS search radar will see contacts that are out-bound and not pay attention to them. The CIWS will only engage a target if it's approaching the ship.
How did that skeet shot scenario with RIM-7 go again?
Originally posted by SIRR1
I think this was a one time hit ! And that possibly the IDF had their gaurd down not expecting a anti ship missile to be fired from Lebanon.
If Hammas, Hesbullah, Syria or Iran really wanted to make a statement or if they really had the ability they would have hit one of the ferries moving US or UK citizens out of Lebanon or shot more missiles at IDF ships sitting off shore.
Originally posted by iqonx
It's definitely a C-701 style missile.
-It's warhead is about 29kg which would explain the damage done to the ship the C-801/2 have a warhead of about 165kg which in my opinion would have split that Israeli ship in half and to the bottom of the ocean.
-C-701 Range of about 15km-20km. The ship was hit about 17km from the mainland of Lebanon.
Originally posted by SIRR1
One thing we need to notice is that the IDF ship was damaged not sunk.
I think this was just a lucky shot fired by most likley dead or vaporized Hesbullah terrorist. As soon as the shot was tracked back to the source I am sure that whole area was leveled, hopefully taken more of the missiles out of action.