Originally posted by Rockpuck
Typical response. 
So we should go by your line of thought, which would be because America armed Israel, which is the only reason they were not massacred after their
founding, we should allow all terrorism? Because they are "Freedom fighters" for a few radical Islamist they should be pardoned from international
war regulations?
first off a very typical response from you may i say
did i just Israel? the United States is proven to be the largest sponsore of terror cells around the world army more terrorists then Iran and syria
and so on combined to push its own agenda ahead after they have proven their usefull ness they are let of the leach and become the main menace to
society,
did i say they should be pardend from international laws?
or by your definition is sirael excempt from international Laws killing thousends of people and making thousends homless?
both sides use force Israel use more force and kill 10times more people
my line of response goes with look at your own country first before preaching about others or are you to short sighted to do that?
Iran may be bad but your country compared to it makes it look like a saint
let history speack for its self up to this day
Originally posted by Rockpuck
Of course, I forgot, because they are the "Oppressed" people, they cannot help it, they cannot fight conventional war so they don't need to
follow the rules. You don't win wars like that, it is a messy business and if we continue to be weak and allowing militias to push us around,
worrying about what little insignificant states in europe feel about it, we will never end this war.
Even if you do not support Israel, I do not see how it is hard to say the terrorist, i mean "Freedom fighters" tactics are just as bad as
Israel bombing infrastructure. Israel may kill civilians but not on purpose, Hezbollah does it intentially. 
call it what you want i said in diffrent views they are seen as diffrent things terrorists/freedom fighter no where did i quote what i thought they
were
sorry couldnt help my self laughing Israel not killing cuvilians on purpose in one week they have managed to kill over 200 cuvilians in both palistian
and labonan
with only a handfull of israelis killed which were done by strikes after Israel bombed lebonan areas and killed familes
i dont see Israel following these rules blowing up power stations, bridges, roads
things that are protected under international laws
Originally posted by White Chapel
Typical anti-US bashing. Do you also blame the Russians when terrorists use AK-47's to shoot women who have the audicity to ride in the front seat of
a car? What about China for the blades used to chop the heads off of innocent reporters, or perhaps the Japanese for making the camera that filmed
it? This is a ridiculous and short-sighted post, I can't believe I even took the time to respond to it.
typical response
everythings anti US bashing if the US is put into the frame,
read my response again and if you cant post anything constructive dont
follow your own advice dont reply
i dont really expect a half decent reply from someone as ignorant as your self who goes down to personale attacks.
also terrorists dont just US aks they use a variety
as i said above read my reply again
Originally posted by Anon4this1
I feel that Isreal has cut enough slack in this case, IMHO. How long should they sit around while rockets are launched into their country? And also,
how many soldiers should be kidnapped? I, for one, like the example that I see here and think we would do well to somewhat adopt the same
strategy.
You cannot "deal" with terrorists. There is no "deal". No matter who the terrorist is.
its ok for Israel to imprison lebonease/palistians in raids on their homes speculatiosn they are part of a militia and according to americans and some
other europeans its detaining and is done to protect their people yet when its on the other side its just plain kidnapping atleast it wasnt israeli
cuvilians but people in uniform
also as stated before rockets on started hitting cuvilains areas in israel when israel launched the first deadly strike on leabonease soil killing
countless familes,
or is it only ok for israel to defend its self not the lebonease?
Originally posted by snakebite
If this missle is used against israel than iran is asking to be bomb back to the stone age.
As hezbollah seem to be getting their grubby little hands on a some upgrades recentley. the UAV that hit the ship, now they have missles that can
strike deep into israel.
Iran is playing with fire, and is gonna get burned, if they really think if the US decided that iran needed to be taken out, there not alot they could
do. Im no fan of The US or Her president. but iran is no much in miltary terms for the US , if they want to send their airforce against the US. well
ask saddam what use that will do, the US has the best toys and gagdets for it soilders. , american need not do anything, just sit back and let israel
nuke iran.
before Iran is bombed back to the stone age
they would also send Israel back to the stone age this is a country that has countless missiles that can reach israel and with the sheer size of
israel it wouldnt take alot to send it back to the stone ages, in sense israel would aslo be playing with fire,
to the dude that said a ground offencive
it would be deadly for israel as these arent palistain milita armed with home made weapons, hazbollah are well armed and can pack a punch
also whats with Mahren he starts a topic and when he is backed into a corner he doesnt say anything back?
[edit on 18-7-2006 by bodrul]
