It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
So we can talk to Mr. lear, ask him questions (that being the TITLE), but only if we agree with everything he's saying???
Originally posted by TheyAreNotWhoTheySayTheyR
Unfortunately this site has become about people claiming to know something everyone else does'nt, standing on a high horse, and then flaming people when they don't believe their "aliens live in my attic" nonsense which is without ANY scrap of evidence.
Hopefully either the admins will start to reign in all these opportunists, or perhaps a better forum will start elsewhere, with SANE discussion, and not just wild stories.
And hey - i believe in some crazy stuff - but I prefer my crazy stuff to be at least PARTIALLY DIGESTABLE!
edited for censor circumvention (too)
[edit on 12-7-2006 by masqua]
Originally posted by Denied
You can constructivly disagree, can you not?
Originally posted by Springer
One of our Moderators has already chimed in on this thread indicating the REQUIREMENT for CIVIL and POLITE conversation here.
I just deleted two posts, one that will get the member who posted it a 3 day break from these Fora and one that indicated the first one was RUDE, useless and added nothing to the conversation (no worries for that member I would've said the same dam thing).
GET POLITE or GET thyself to another thread. If you think John Lear is a madman who is full of it that's your right, BUT we don't need to read you opinion in this thread get it? The man is sharing his life's experience and aural knowledge, he has every right to do so since a Member ASKED him to. If a Member asks YOU to share YOUR opinion of John Lear rest assured I will protect that thread with equal vehemence whether your opinion is positive, negative or somewhere in the middle.
ATS is NOT a site available to useless diatribe pointing out the OBVIOUS and admitted lack of evidence and scientific basis in Mr. Lear's offerings. He clearly states the "mainstream" scientific community and NASA have covered all these things up in his opinion. Going forward from that point is NOT a hard thing to do, if it causes you grief to read this then please don't.
If you can be socially graceful and CIVIL in your challenges and accept when the man says he has no proof then do so if you can't then don't post. There are many Members who would like to read what he has to say and by George they are going to be able to read it.
If there are millions of beings on Mars, why couldn't one of them help out the little land rover that was stuck in a ditch when it was on there?
Originally posted by Denied
John i found this.
And a portion from the link.
He then decided to test the UFO society by faking some government documents about aliens, the Krlll (pronounced "Krill") Files. All of the UFO society (but one) checked out the material included in the files and found large inconsistencies and lies. The one person who didn't was Cooper, who claimed to have seen the documents when he was working for the government. When the files were declared as faked, Lear and Cooper were barred from Paranet and the friendship between them broke down, Cooper accusing Lear of being a government agent. Lear is now lecturing about his Hypothesis.
Do you have any comments on this statement?
Originally posted by Vector J
John, i'd be very interested to know if you are aware of any specific involvement in all this by the British governement, or British agencies, or if its mainly Americans perpetrating the coverup?...
but I do clearly remember Jim asking me to participate in a UFO hoax which I refused to do.
Originally posted by denythestatusquo
Some believe that the governments of the world also let ET have their way with us so that they could glean technology from the aliens. Now the hard question when you get past that concept is this: are they only looking out for themselves or do they have the longer term interests of humanity at heart?