Interesting Ma-Ha-Bone I feel a bit of civilization that was lacking in your previous posts, from this post.
Now if we'd all restart, I'd be glad to debate with you sources and what everyone thinks.
As for the shriners, they share their fair amount of attacks by some anti-masons.
Hmm...oh and as for why I don't take your comments as amusing? A sense of desperation, how is one to actually prove he is a mason online? Hence my
"over-zealous" and cosequently retarded and infuriated statements, that is like backing me in a corner.
As for your "Do you think I am a junior member?" no I do not, see the other thread and you'll see me blow up about your name
I know fully well you are someone else on this forum, and I'm pretty certain you chose your name to challenge me, or at least be posting against me
I never suggested Mystery Novels as a resource? In fact one of my favorite sources for an over view of Masonry's history is "The Temple and the
Lodge" by Michael Baigent and Richard Leigh.
Honestly I had figured I was the first freemason to drop in, it's interesting I'm not, but where are all his posts? I'd care to see them
Hmm Ma-Ha-Bone, would you believe I were a Freemason, MORE if I had a different name? And did not take so much interest in starting forums on
discussing the topic? I don't doubt there have been people claiming to be people such as George Bush, but I don't "claim" anything.
When I first came here it was hard to write anything, because as surely you (and your VAST knowledge on "freemasonry") know, we are not supposed to
"argue" about masonry. I first posted the other post, simply as my view points, and never intended to actually debate it, but certain individuals
other than just yourself, agrevated me and I became over involved.
My sources would be Morals and Dogma (You really should read it) and The Temple and the Lodge, as well as the monitors for the first second and third
degrees. And my experiences. Of course none of which really is discussable.
We can talk about the two books but you claim one means one thing, I claim it means another. That's not going to work very well? That's why I
demand your quote in Morals and Dogma where he states luciferianism.
Once you do that, I can come up with a BY FAR educated response.
And I'd not be breaking a promise to prove I'm a freemason, I just have no means to do so online, if I had a scanner I'd email you my license
plates, in my apron, which actually might not be such a bad idea, but I don't have a scanner. Although I'll actually try and do that, just for
But then you'll have to send me a picture of the stupification on your face ok? Because I doubt highly you believe me now. And am sure you'll come
up with some stupid excuse, "oh he's just wearing a friend's garment, or that's his friends car, blah blah".
If you actually want a more civilized discussion, do not open it by insulting me by claiming I'm not what I am. Fair enough?
So let's begin with your quotes, and I'll do a little more research on your sources that I have not read.