It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by point
The jealous, vengeful, wrathful god spoken of in the Old testament switching from possible child/human sacrifice to animal sacrifice is an improvement, but why the need for such a sacrifice at all?
Originally posted by Nygdan
Well, also keep in mind, preists don't get paid a salary or own farms. The preistly class is allways supported by what the Temple is given, food, cloth, etc.
Originally posted by Griff
Isn't that what the "Davinci Code" is about kinda? A female consort of Jesus (who is God incarnate). I am one who believes in God and Goddess.
posted by dawnstar
I think the feminine in God is what we refer to as the Holy Spirit. When they claim all sins will be forgiven, except the sin of Blasphemy against the Holy Spirit, well, maybe they're talking about denying the feminine of God, the Holy Spirit, and what she gives to the people of God . . [Edited by Don W]
“ . . the church has and still does, occasionally teach people to ignore these traits . . to fight against them, in the name of obedience to humans, especially if you are a female.
Originally posted by JackofBlades
I'm not like a bible-study-guy so I may be wrong but I thought the Trinity referred to Jesus, God etc?
If it does then wasn't genesis a long LONG time before he was even born? And you could say that God knew he was coming etc, but why would God feel the need to say this to someone who wasn't even concieved (far off)?
I think this is going to get some pretty good responses. Good eye!
posted by Mr Totality
posted by JackofBlades
I thought the Trinity referred to Jesus, God etc? If it does then wasn't Genesis a long time before He was born? you say that God knew he was coming etc, but why would God feel the need to say this to someone who wasn't even conceived? I think this is going to get some pretty good responses. [Edited by Don W]
Trinity is not an OT topic it is a NT topic
posted by wellwhatnow
We may be looking at an issue of interpretation here. I don't speak Hebrew; I speak English and Spanish. In Spanish there are many forms of the word for “you,” depending on who you are talking about. All words in Spanish that refer to a higher power would be in the plural versions of the word. It would simply be a form of respect, not a belief that I was writing about more than one higher power.
If someone later was to translate my writing into English and translate the words literally, they might mistakenly believe that I was talking about more than one deity. Could Hebrew have worked the same way when Genesis was written? [Edited by Don W]
Originally posted by Mirthful Me
www.wrestedscriptures.com...
The trinity and angels were the first to come to my mind, good point though.
Originally posted by donwhite
Many students of the ancient religions in the Land of Canaan and the struggles of the Hebrew people, believe that the story of Abraham and Isaac is the way the writer had to explain the end of child sacrifice which may have - indeed probably - was practiced by the old time Hebrews. The writer for the God of Abraham was suggesting an offering of a ram or goat might work as well as the sacrifice of a child. A big improvement, I’d say.
Originally posted by Nygdan
Well, also keep in mind, preists don't get paid a salary or own farms. The preistly class is allways supported by what the Temple is given, food, cloth, etc.
posted by curiousity
posted by Nygdan
“ . . priests don't get paid a salary. . The priestly class is always supported by what the Temple is given, food, cloth, etc. [Edited by Don W]
The Levites, priests of the OT . . Joshua 13:14 "Only unto the tribe of Levi he gave no inheritance; the sacrifices of the LORD God of Israel made by fire are their inheritance, as he said unto them . . “
[Edited by Don W]
“ . . had no particular share in the division of the land of Israel among their brothers, The Levites part was the "tithe" and except for that which was sacrificed in honor of God, included, apparently, money as well as crops, bread, animals, cloth, and so on, etc.”
Ref: Joshua 13:14 Only unto the tribe of Levi he gave none inheritance; the sacrifices of the LORD God of Israel made by fire are their inheritance, as he said unto them. In Numbers 35:2-8, the Levites were also given cities and "suburbs" at God's commandment as well as some land around the cities circumference (This can also be found in Joshua and Chronicles)
Originally posted by donwhiteActually, it is also thought the first priests of Israel were the descendants of Aaron, Moses’ brother. This priesthood was called the “Aaronic” priesthood.
Originally posted by donwhiteThey prevailed early in biblical history, especially in the Sinai. Later, after the conquest of the Promised Land, the Levites became dominant. Almost all of the OT was written by the Levites and only passing and usually derogatory references are made to the Aaronites who settled in Samaria.
Originally posted by donwhiteBut yet, C, you then offer a reference, Numbers 35, in which you quote, “ . . the Levites were also given cities and "suburbs" at God's commandment as well as some land around the cities circumference . . “
On the one hand you quote Joshua, “ . . [The Levites] had no particular share in the division of the land of Israel among their brothers, The Levites part was the "tithe" . . ....So which is it? No share in the land, or cities and suburbs? It seems each award is mutually exclusive.