It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by eaglewingz
So how is 51% not a majority? Last time I checked, anything over 50 makes a majority.
Originally posted by Two Steps Forward
Since most of the voting public didn't vote
Sixty-four percent of U.S. citizens age 18 and over voted in the 2004 presidential election
Originally posted by eaglewingz
I think you mean most of the registered public didn't vote.
The voting public voted, thus the name.
So yes, 51% of the voting public voted for Bush. Seagull is correct.
Originally posted by Two Steps Forward
No, he's not, because he was using that argument to refute someone else's implied characterization of Bush supporters as "not normal." Seagull was claiming that a majority of Americans must by definition be "normal." For that argument to hold water, the Bush "supporters" indicated by those who voted for him must constitute a majority, not only of those who actually voted, but of those who could have done so.
Originally posted by gallopinghordes
why so I support President Bush? Because he is my president and as such deserves my support...You notice I said my country not the United Nations, European Union or any other group.
So not the point are you trying to compare Bush to Hitler if so please give proof. You may certainly say my view is wrong that is your right just as I may say as I do that your view is wrong. I therefore, suggest that we simply agree to disagree. I fear I just can't get as angry about your views and you seem to about mine your views just don't mean that much to me. Have a great day.
Originally posted by rizla
Well, I'm able to accept you have an alternative viewpoint. However, I must draw a line with relativism and say your viewpoint is wrong. Would you support Hitler?
Originally posted by gallopinghordes
why so I support President Bush? Because he is my president and as such deserves my support.
Originally posted by Two Steps Forward
You're right. I stand corrected.
However, it makes no difference,.......
Originally posted by pavil
2. Bush stole the election. Bush rigged the election. There is no way Gore/Kerry should have lost.
3. He won but didn't get the majority of the votes, therefore he really lost.
3. The "profiteers' voted and kept him in office.
Originally posted by pavil
4. People that support or voted for Bush are not "normal".
5. People that voted for Bush are knee jerk conservatives who can't think for themselves.
Originally posted by pavil
What does the Democratic party stand for, not against?
Originally posted by pavil
And yes, I did vote for Bush so you may discard my viewpoint, since that is not what you want to hear.
Originally posted by rizla
Well, the democratic candidates in the last two elections did get more votes. Bush was selected the first time, wrongly. In the second it now seems Ohio suffered huge vote fraud.
Please stick to the thread point. This is not a partisan thread. Disagreement with Bush does not implicitly mean support for Democrats.
Originally posted by Two Steps Forward
There's no reason to get defensive about it. It's just curiosity.
and less than a majority of the voting public voted.