Loose Change setup to be debunked!, page 2

first, lets used an unenhanced version of fatty B.
911myths.com...

the middle image is the infamous fatty B image. unenhanced, unsharpened, etc. doesnt look so fat to me anymore. looks to me like a man smiling.
bsbray the fundamental flaw in your argument is that you are basing this all on one still out of an entire video. you can tell me not to compare profiles to head ons blah blah but its all the same. when you have ONE, ONE still that looks, while smiling proudly, in comparison to the rest of the stills where he looks normal while normally talking, its not much of an argument at all!

and why would such a detail be there? call it non-sequitor because it doesnt fit your agenda, but i dont think it would be in there if it were fake. why mention holland, and the supposed rise in islam after september 11th?

and im grasping at straws? you keep focusing one ONE stillframe, when the rest dont look fat!!! does that say anything?

anyway,
i believe we have a miscommunication, i posted:
"in addition, in reference to photo D
newsfeed.tcm.ie...
the nose curve is the same, which is not seen from head on.
the angle of shot D just speaks for itself. the right side of his face appears rounder because of the angle and the way his beard takes shape upon his face. "
i was not talking about fatty at that time. you think i did because you then posted to the two small close shots of the fatty nose and the one i linked to. i was just talking about picture D, not the fatty one at that point. i was trying to point out D isnt a different osama but anyway. i should have clarified.

the turban of the second shot is smaller than the first.
you can see the right side of it shift left. the whole face gets skinnier, along with the turban. if the turbans were scaled together it would look different
A shots nose looks wider because its less defined than b shots nose. the nose doesnt change size between shots, it changes in its definition, which makes the nose look skinnier. there is no definition in the nose of shot A.
the sound production of A makes the cheekbones appear to be higher, raised, but in reality its his muscles tensing to produce that sound.
shot B he is producing an OO sound, his lips must come out and slightly pucker, which pulls the muscles and skin in a different direction, it relaxes them. you can also see his eyebrows raise back as he does this, in comparison with the tense eyebrows in shot A of the gif.

and above all this, you ignore possible weight gains and loses as a result of his kidney dialysis.

furthermore, another possibility is the use of doubles. Al-qaeda psyops, since youre concerned with that.

washingtontimes.com...

www.hinduonnet.com...

there are too many aspects of this to pin it as a fallacy, bsbray.