It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by Paralaxx
Ok, whether you believe or not. Just a question or two....
Assume that both sides during WW2 were controlled by the same group for purposes of creating a new world order.
Wouldn't letting Germany win, help that? Couldn't America/Britian just have tried to not do a good job in defeating Germany?
Originally posted by DrBones666
This was taken from www.threeworldwars.com
"The First World War must be brought about in order to permit the Illuminati to overthrow the power of the Czars in Russia and of making that country a fortress of atheistic Communism... At the end of the war, Communism will be built and used in order to destroy the other governments and in order to weaken the religions."
"During the Second World War, International Communism must become strong enough in order to balance Christendom, which would be then restrained and held in check until the time when we would need it for the final social cataclysm."
"We shall unleash the Nihilists and the atheists, and we shall provoke a formidable social cataclysm which in all its horror will show clearly to the nations the effect of absolute atheism, origin of savagery and of the most bloody turmoil. Then everywhere, the citizens, obliged to defend themselves against the world minority of revolutionaries, will exterminate those destroyers of civilization, and the multitude, disillusioned with Christianity, whose deistic spirits will from that moment be without compass or direction, anxious for an ideal, but without knowing where to render its adoration, will receive the true light through the universal manifestation of the pure doctrine of Lucifer, brought finally out in the public view. This manifestation will result from the general reactionary movement which will follow the destruction of Christianity and atheism, both conquered and exterminated at the same time."
32: And the multitude of them that believed were of one heart and of one soul: neither said any of them that ought of the things which he possessed was his own; but they had all things common.
34: Neither was there any among them that lacked: for as many as were possessors of lands or houses sold them, and brought the prices of the things that were sold,
35: And laid them down at the apostles' feet: and distribution was made unto every man according as he had need.
Acts Chapter 4
Originally posted by Pita
.... wouldnt it have been a better choice for the allies to become an ally of Hitlers germany? They would have been able to stop the holocaust and defeat stalin ....
Originally posted by wang
People who call hitler a "patsy" are fools.
He was a genius in his own right, yes he was a racist, and he was no military genius. So please i dont think any of you who call histler a "patsy" could of taking control of a countries government, and start a war machine that will be studied for hundreds if not thousands of years.
As stated plenty of times befor this, the reason why hitler lost was Mother Russia. Russia is not like other countries at the time, it has such a large areas of space that it is nearly impossible to have controlled all of russia. If the german troops won at stalingrad they "might" of been able to take the siberian industry, and call for a peace treaty with russia, taking alot of their land. This is what i think Hitler was trying to do. As we all know Germany got beaten at stalingrad, and the german eastern front fell back to eastern germany. With the red hordes behind them. What would of been a more sound stratergy was to focus on britan and africa, take some of the british mainland, and take all of egpyt then work your way down to British India. I belive if Britan lost India and some of its homeland it would of declared peace on Germany. Leaving the Russians to last.
But thats all theory.
Originally posted by Fighting Kentuctian
To me it seems that Germany did just about everything to lose the war, was Hitler the ultimate patsy?