It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
I'm SURE you do not know what armed conflict is like. It is alot easier to sit and say you will, but when it comes down to it i'm sure it'd be a different story in the MAJORITY of cases.
the jewish people invaded it, so the Palestinian people fight back
i have come to the conclusion that your unable to put yourself in other peoples shoes
shame on the first person to introduce this reasoning into this thread!
Me: “Hey, Iran converted the Sahab-3 to carry nukes to kill Israeli’s and Americans…”
You: “Well, the Palestinian really should have that land…”
You see how horrible that logic is? You are all but condoning Iran’s use of nuclear missiles to destroy and entire race of people. SICK!!
If the conversation on an "Iran built a nuclear capable missile" thread leads the discussion to questioning Israels right to the land shows somebody has a twisted logic process.
Originally posted by Knights
Yes but i'm sure a certain 'blitzkrieg' tactic will be used and i'm almost certain the US has already devised lists of strategic sites to be targetted. For example Government buildings, SAM sites, Military bases, Communication sites.
It is extremely easy to say supplies will be given and these regimes will be funded but IF war is declared, when it is 'announced' within minutes bombs will rain from the skies. Something which Iran has very little protection against.
Like Iraq however, I feel that Iran's military capabilites will cease to exist almost straight away. Guerilla tactics will not. The US will substain heavy losses in street to street fighting.
Both sides will lose. Is it reaqlly worth developing a nuclear weapon and risk sacrificing every person/ animal/ plant on this planet in the process?