It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

Hilary Clinton for prez...no

page: 1
0
<<   2 >>

log in

join
share:

posted on Mar, 19 2006 @ 09:46 AM
link   
I just would like to know peoples opinions on hilary clinton running for president next election?




posted on Mar, 19 2006 @ 10:29 AM
link   
I would be all for it!

She is such a polarizing figure. It would be just what the Republicans need to win another Presidential election!



posted on Mar, 19 2006 @ 05:25 PM
link   
I would have to agree with the above poster (except for the joyous tone...


In my opinion Hillary is too polarizing a figure. If the Dem's link arms with her both will be walking off a cliff together.



posted on Mar, 19 2006 @ 05:53 PM
link   
Well it depends to me, I'm all for it if Condi ends up running.

I'd however like to see a socialist candidate win the election, but really for me it will be who I agree with more.



posted on Mar, 20 2006 @ 05:46 AM
link   
where does she stand on abortion, gay marriage, national security, stuff like that??



posted on Mar, 20 2006 @ 07:56 PM
link   
Oh god no. Please not another Clinton. Just what we don't need. Only thing worse would be another Carter.

The Clinton family and the Bush family should please, PLEASE, go away, far far away. Maybe Canada? Or is that an act of war?

Just for giggles, I wish the democratic party would run a main stream candidate like a Lieberman, or a Nunn, I think they would be pleasently surprised at the result.



posted on Mar, 20 2006 @ 08:25 PM
link   
i_took_the_red_pill, to answer part of your question, about where Mrs. Clinton stands on things, on abortion she considers it a womans right and thinks that it should be legal, but not to the point where it's a commonplace act.



EDIT:
Fixed spelling and bolding errors.

[edit on 3/20/2006 by iori_komei]



posted on Mar, 20 2006 @ 08:48 PM
link   
Do you remember the comment the W said about "bush,clinton,bush,clinton? He might be right, God I hope not but who knows...I think its all rigged anyway and we should all vote for me



posted on Mar, 20 2006 @ 08:58 PM
link   
Who are you refering to when you say "W"?, just curious.


Oh, and no, you should all vote for me, the loveable socialist, scientist scamp.


[edit on 3/20/2006 by iori_komei]



posted on Mar, 21 2006 @ 12:58 AM
link   
well that's good that she supports abortion, but i don't know if i would want a female president that could'nt give a blowj.... yeah



posted on Mar, 21 2006 @ 07:38 AM
link   
I'll vote for both of you, as long as you give me a really cool job in your administration...say secdef, or secretary of state. I'm a really nice guy who wouldn't write a tell all book about you after we were out of office, or if I did, nothing but good stuff...really! And further more, I promise that my confermation hearing would make for must see TV.

On a more serious note...

I am not sure I trust Hillary's swing to the center on many of her views over the past year or so...something just doesn't set right with me about her, and I can't even say what it is, which makes conversations about her really hard. Just something not quite right isn't much use in persuading people to my views.

[edit on 21-3-2006 by seagull]



posted on Mar, 21 2006 @ 07:42 AM
link   

Originally posted by iori_komei
Who are you refering to when you say "W"?, just curious.


Oh, and no, you should all vote for me, the loveable socialist, scientist scamp.


[edit on 3/20/2006 by iori_komei]


GWB "dubya", in office now. I saw a press thingy and he said those very words (or some reasonable facsimille thereof). I think it was some charity or sumpin...whatever....anyway, I thought it was funny and maybe prophetic. Or maybe (more likely) it was just a mispoken word or two...hahahaha. I support Bush and his testoterone approach but I'm thinking I'd like to see what a woman could do in office. If the fems get their way they can have a shot with Clinton. If their candidate screws it up then I guess they are no better than us menfolk at politics, hmmmm? Equality, interesting thing about it is if you screw up when you get your shot, you can't complain anymore about it, huh?



posted on Mar, 21 2006 @ 09:33 AM
link   

Originally posted by iori_komei
Well it depends to me, I'm all for it if Condi ends up running.


I find it humorous that Condi has clearly stated numerous... Countless times that she will not be running for President. This post isn't directed at you iori... Just at all the people that continue to wonder about whether she will be running or not.

I wish she would... I would vote for her. But, alas, She is not interested in running for President.



posted on Mar, 25 2006 @ 10:10 PM
link   
who ever is president next term it will not be of any americans choice...we only have one more choice than Russia



posted on Mar, 25 2006 @ 10:41 PM
link   
ETHICS QUESTION

This test only has one question, but it's a very important one. By giving
an honest answer, you will discover where you stand morally. The test
features an unlikely, completely fictional situation in which you will have
to make a decision. Remember that your answer needs to be honest, yet
spontaneous.

Please scroll down slowly and give due consideration to each line.

Answer honestly!!!


You are in Florida, Miami to be specific.

There is chaos all around you caused by a hurricane with severe flooding.

This is a flood of biblical proportions.

You are photojournalist working for a major newspaper, and you're caught in
the middle of this epic disaster.

The situation is nearly hopeless.

You're trying to shoot career-making photos.

There are houses and people swirling around you, some disappearing under
the water.


Nature is unleashing all of its destructive fury.

Suddenly you see a woman in the water.

She is fighting for her life, trying not to be taken down with the debris.

You move closer.

Somehow the woman looks familiar.

You suddenly realize who it is.

It's Hillary Clinton!


At the same time you notice that the raging waters are about to take her
under forever.

You have two options-you can save the life of Hillary Clinton, or you can
shoot a dramatic Pulitzer Prize winning photo, documenting the death of one
ofthe world's most powerful women.

So here's the question, and please give an honest answer.......



Would you select high contrast color film, or would you go with the classic
simplicity of black and white?






posted on Mar, 25 2006 @ 11:37 PM
link   
I guess it really doesn't really matter who wins since they're all working towards the same goal. Hillary Clinton like the rest of them is part of the ILLUMINATI.



posted on Mar, 26 2006 @ 01:00 AM
link   
Hillary is a hawk. Oddly, she is also a socialist, except when it comes to questionable real estate investments. Like her husband, she is a avid poll watcher and might come off sounding a little fickle when she tries to respond to the shifting winds of public opinion.

Hillary might run, but she is far from a shoo-in for the nomination, much less the Presidency. Given the fact that neither a woman nor a black has ever occupied the White House, I think that best chance for the first woman in the White House in Condoleezza Rice.

However, I am still of the mind that America is not ready for a female President and that Condoleezza Rice knows that better than anyone. And, further more, Rice is a brilliant, refined woman who has served her country with extraordinary distinction, without having to enter the mudslinging, nitty-gritty of partisan politics. She could serve as well for a Democratic administration as she has for the Bush administration, though she might not serve in a higher position than an ambassadorship.

Clearly, Rice has served in ways that have made history, without having to endure the stress and vicious attacks that plague the Presidency, if you ignore some highly racist and mean-spirited caricatures by the political cartoonists from the tolerance and sensitivity camp of American politics.

[edit on 2006/3/26 by GradyPhilpott]



posted on Mar, 26 2006 @ 11:17 AM
link   
Hilary should never be president. She's drunk on power and dangerous. There was a time when she had the best intrest of the american people in her mind. That's not the case anymore she supports many of the same policies that are hurting this country. Plus she will say anything to get what she wants.

[edit on 26-3-2006 by DiRtYDeViL]



posted on Mar, 26 2006 @ 12:48 PM
link   

Originally posted by DiRtYDeViL
Hilary should never be president. She's drunk on power and dangerous. There was a time when she had the best intrest of the american people in her mind. That's not the case anymore she supports many of the same policies that are hurting this country. Plus she will say anything to get what she wants.


Can the same not be said for just about every politician in DC right now? I'm not defending Hillary, actually the opposite - I think her and every one of her colleauges need to be hung for high treason... but hey, that's just me.



posted on Mar, 26 2006 @ 04:06 PM
link   

Originally posted by DiRtYDeViL
Hilary should never be president. She's drunk on power and dangerous. There was a time when she had the best intrest of the american people in her mind. That's not the case anymore she supports many of the same policies that are hurting this country. Plus she will say anything to get what she wants.

[edit on 26-3-2006 by DiRtYDeViL]


And how is this different than any politician in recent history?



new topics

top topics



 
0
<<   2 >>

log in

join