It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by BlueAngel
Interesting, hasn't the Cold War ended?
We should be putting our money towards counter terrorist efforts, not into creating new nuclear weapons when we already have enough to blow up the world many times over.
BlueAngel
Originally posted by rogue1
The point of the program is to make sure the Brit nuclar deterrant reamins reliable without the need for fullscale testing. They aren't going to increase the number of warheads just replace them with warheads which are reliable and will work if needed.
BBC ReportLast year, a group of writers, led by Nobel Prize winner Harold Pinter, wrote an open letter to MPs saying there was "no legitimate political, military or moral reason" for replacing Trident.
Originally posted by Caligulas
No matter how sophisticated they are,they'll still be eaten by plasma streams.No matter how fast or stealthy they are,our devices will still detect and outrun them
Originally posted by byhiniur
By showing that your swallowing the governments reasons whole, you might as well not have bothered posting. Say they are telling us the truth (as if), then whats going to happen to the old stockpiles. Trident is described as one of the most advanced systems in the world, and considering no sane person ever wants to use nuclear weaponry, it should be disbanded, not upgraded.
Originally posted by rogue1
On the contrary, I understand teh argument where obviously you do not.
4. Umm yeah good idea disband teh UK's nuclear deterrant, shame no other country would do the same. Hardly makes semse does it.
Unfortunately it seems you know very little about the subject, a typical headline reader.
As The Sunday Times reveals today, the data produced by the test were part of a much wider, secret research programme to build a new nuclear weapon that some experts say will breach the Nuclear Non-Proliferation treaty (NPT).
Originally posted by Caligulas
No matter how sophisticated they are,they'll still be eaten by plasma streams.No matter how fast or stealthy they are,our devices will still detect and outrun them
Hopefully the little demonstration on 11th ,north of Sacramento was enough.
Originally posted by byhiniur
IMHO we should be working towards global cohesion, not allow everyone to sit on a pile of nukes, in the hope that is deters others from bombing them.
Originally posted by ShadowXIX
In a perfect world that would be nice, but we live in anything but that
Originally posted by Vitchilo
The US should be spending their money on their own citizens instead of this nuke research and this terrorist crap. There is a lot of poor people in you're own country isn't that much more important than this boogeyman of Ben Laden?
Originally posted by byhiniur
These 'enemies' will use force, but I don't see how us having a nuke is going to prevent any attacks if they believe in their cause.
Interesting, hasn't the Cold War ended?
Originally posted by byhiniur
These 'enemies' will use force, but I don't see how us having a nuke is going to prevent any attacks if they believe in their cause.
Originally posted by byhiniur
I'm not going to pretend to fully understand Islamic-terrorist goals, but it seems to me they aren't happy with the way the West is running it's ship
and considering no sane person ever wants to use nuclear weaponry, it should be disbanded, not upgraded.
Originally posted by Westpoint23Perhaps, however one thing is for sure, time has not ended, neither has the need for nuclear weapons. Nothing last forever, and everything has a shelf life, most of the US ICBM’s and nuclear warheads were designed during the cold war, their time is coming to an end. To ensure that MAD still exists we have to upgrade and eventually replace our Nuclear Force.
Originally posted by devil wasp
No disrespect but if I done a dirty harry and said "Give me your money....punk..." then would you dive out the way and do a james bond or just give me your money?
Originally posted by Shadow XIX
"If you can't win the pot then don't play a hand"
Can you name a single time a nuclear power was invaded by another country? I can name thousands of times non nuclear powers were invaded by others.
Originally posted by Murcielago
1.and you care why...?
Islam seems to me to be a rediculous religion, in no other religion do people go blow them selves up by a group of people then they do...I couldn't give a damn what they think about the west.
2.Do you consider the leaders of Iran & NK sane?
What would be the scenerio if they aquired or produced nukes, and we no longer had them? It wouldn't be a world I'd want to live in.
Originally posted by byhiniur
I'd tell you no and walk away. Violence, as I said, is caused by ignorance, it is unnessecary.
Originally posted by devilwasp
You'd say no and get shot, ok.....
Originally posted by byhiniur
I'm not sayin have no defences. But nuclear weapons are too extreme.
Your shot hits my bullet proof vest, I grab your gun... now run boy, run.
[edit on 14/3/06 by byhiniur]