It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by xpert11
I cant be the only one who thinks this deal could go south in a few years.
The Bush admin cries wolf over Irans nuclear program and then makes this deal with India.
Originally posted by mikesingh
But, India is the biggest democracy with a rule of law
refused to provide India with nuclear fuel etc until it signs the NPT
India is now well on the way to nuclearise its energy production
mojo4sale
.On the other they strike a deal with Pakistans greatest adversary.
Something smells, in fact something absolutely stinks.
Will we now need to add the asian sub continent to this list
through nuclear deal.Have you noticed who else they share a border with.Hmmmmm.....
Of course they have contributed to nuclear proliferation as has Pakistan just by having nuclear weapons.Even 1 wmd adds to the proliferation of these weapons.
when it comes to the US and there foreign policy i cant help but feel that we(normal joes) arent always being told the whole truth.
At no time have i said that India is doing anything wrong.
Originally posted by 2smart2curious
but can u trust ahmedijined who goes on harping about israels destruction, surely a head of state will show some political tact n diplomacy as not to air his personal views to the whole world
Originally posted by Odium
placing someone else in charge? This is what he means by "Destruction".
Originally posted by Odium
Iran has Jewish people living their as well as Christian's
the only thing that would change in his ideal world would be who is in charge. This is no different to what many Government's of the World desire
- in fact, many people on this site desire to see the Iranian Government gone and replaced by another Government which they see as fair.
if we bomb them or Israel or anyone else does you'll shift the balance of power
mojo4sale
.On the other they strike a deal with Pakistans greatest adversary.
Something smells, in fact something absolutely stinks.
Nygdan
India is the more 'reasonable' long term partner in that section of the world for the United States. Its an open liberal democracy with growing economic ties to the US and a big exchange of population due to immigration. Pakistan is an ally becaouse of musharraf, who is a dictator, a very benign dictator who took over from a corrupted democratic government, but a dictator nonetheless. In 50 years, India is going to be pretty much the same as it is now, just wealthier and stronger. Pakistan might not even exist in 50 years. Who knows what will happen in Pakistan without musharaf.
Having said that, pakistan has, in many ways, a democratic system in place that is growing in strength, merely under the director-ship of Musharaf, who does, to an extent, run the country because the public accepts him. So its not a case of an 'evil strong-man thuggish dictator' like with iraq. Pakistan stands a good chance of becoming a stable democracy post Musharaf.
mojo4sale
Will we now need to add the asian sub continent to this list
Nygdan
What do you mean 'add'? US connections in India aren't going to make india an islamic republic or a terrorist state. If anything, with the US as an ally of India, and as an ally of Pakistan, it will force US interests to be for long term peace between the two countries. Already we see Indian nuke plants under a military programme becomming civilian and open to inspection. The US will also be able to use its influence to keep the two countries from being at each other's throats so much.
mojo4sale
through nuclear deal.Have you noticed who else they share a border with.Hmmmmm.....
Nygdan
What do borders matter when we're talking about global thermonuclear war with ICBMs that zoom into space?
mojo4sale
Of course they have contributed to nuclear proliferation as has Pakistan just by having nuclear weapons.Even 1 wmd adds to the proliferation of these weapons.
Nygdan
Big difference between building nukes on yer own and being involved in an international blackmarket for nuke weapons and tech.
mojo4sale
when it comes to the US and there foreign policy i cant help but feel that we(normal joes) arent always being told the whole truth.
Nygdan
Basically, India represents a counter-balance to islamic fundamentalism in Asia. India has had to deal with zealots for a while, and would make an interesting partner in an expanded war on terror. But this deal should'nt exacerbate the tensions in hindu-muslim relations. They've all already got enough issues to try to kill each other over, 'closer relations with the US' doesn't add much to it.
mojo4sale
At no time have i said that India is doing anything wrong.
Nygdan
That doesn't make sense. Its an agreement between India and the US. You can't just say that the US is doing something wrong, but then that india is blameless and that that the agreement is overall good. Obviously the US is acting out of its own bests interest, but that goes for every nation, including india.
Originally posted by dawnstar
is there any other president that has the power to turn a generally peaceful nation into chaos, just by a visit?
from new york timesPresident Bush and Prime Minister Manmohan Singh reached a formal agreement on Mr. Bush's visit to New Delhi this month. But the deal is subject to the approval of Congress and the Nuclear Suppliers Group, the nations that control nuclear trade. And the deal violates American law and the suppliers' group practice because India has not signed the Nuclear Nonproliferation Treaty.
Concerns over proliferation and the continued secrecy of India's nuclear weapons program leave many members of Congress wary. Representative Tom Lantos, the California Democrat, agreed to co-sponsor the bill with Mr. Hyde, though he is undecided. Lynne A. Weil, an aide, said Mr. Lantos "is aware that the questions it raises about nuclear non-proliferation are profound."
Mr. Burns said Thursday, "We are confident we can answer the critics." The debate, he acknowledged, is likely to take months, and he said the vast majority of senators and representatives remained undecided. Congressional officials agreed.
"A great number of members of Congress need to have further discussion and further testimony," he said. Acknowledging that the administration has a long way to go to win majority support in Congress, he added: "We are encouraged by the numbers of senators and representatives who tell us, 'You are on the right track. We like the agreement.' "
Originally posted by Nygdan
Congress is the body that makes foreign treaties in the United States, not the President. The President can 'make deals', but yes, they have to be approved by Congress. As far as this deal meaning a scrapping of the NPT, well, considering that Iran isn't cooperating with the IAEA, but there are no real provisions to stop this, then whats the sense of the NPT anyways, no?
Originally posted by Nygdan
The world is unipolar now, not split between warring capitalist and communist camps, so there isn't as much of a need for third party-neutral agreements like the NPT to accomplish the goals of the NPT anyways. IOW, Any country that wants to increase its nuke stockpile will have to have the tacit permission of the United States today, de facto, so the NPT might be superfluous.
Originally posted by mojo4sale
who voted for the US to be the arbiter of who can and cant have nuclear programs.
It really does need to be a joint venture of the nuclear powers no matter what the framework,
I believe that china and nth korea are still communist, sure china is evolving, but if the NPT becomes nothing more than scrap paper whats to stop china from ramping up their nuclear programs?
Do you think France will ask the US for approval if they decide to restart testing and production if there is no treaty!
Originally posted by Nygdan
Originally posted by mikesingh
But, India is the biggest democracy with a rule of law
Lets not overstate the subject. India is the only democracy in the world that still has an issue with famines. India has roving paramilitary armies in some of its states. It also has some severe sectarian problems between hindus and muslims. And add to that the struggles between the socialists and the nationalists in India and you have a potential for some problems. India has very volatile relations with nearby Pakistan.
Originally posted by Nygdan
Originally posted by mikesingh
refused to provide India with nuclear fuel etc until it signs the NPT
Why the heck should they give India the benefits of the NPT without any of the responsibilities? If India wants to get nuke fuel from the international community, then it will have to participate in the NPT, like anyone else would.
Originally posted by Nygdan
Originally posted by mikesinghIndia is now well on the way to nuclearise its energy production
Considering that the US has one of the best sites on the planet to store its nuke waste, Yucca Mountain, where the heck is India going to store its nuke waste? Is this something that is being talked about in india? Because a storage site must be dry and tectonically stable for the long term, I don't think any part of india meets that qualification.