It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Link
Not only are physically unattractive teenagers likely to be stay-at-homes on prom night, they're also more likely to grow up to be criminals, say two economists who tracked the life course of young people from high school through early adulthood.
"We find that unattractive individuals commit more crime in comparison to average-looking ones, and very attractive individuals commit less crime in comparison to those who are average-looking," say Naci Mocan of the University of Colorado and Erdal Tekin of Georgia State University.
Other studies have shown that unattractive men and women are less likely to be hired, and that they earn less money than the better-looking. Such inferior circumstances may steer some to crime, Mocan and Tekin suggest.
Other studies have shown that unattractive men and women are less likely to be hired, and that they earn less money than the better-looking. Such inferior circumstances may steer some to crime, Mocan and Tekin suggest.
These economists found that the long-term consequences of being young and ugly were small but consistent.
I think the point they're trying to make is people who are left out of normal teenage cliques and society, whether due to physical appearance or other reasons, are more likely to exhibit antisocial behaviour later in life, including commiting crimes. I can see this as a viable standpoint.
It's a sad truth that in life, if you have a handsome man applying for a job, he will come across as more personable than a man with less aesthetic features. Do I agree with this? Absolutely not. Do I deny it happens? Nope.
Also, I see it very fitting that economists would be following trends in society. Do you not think these economists might be interested in the financial side of people's appearance and its influence on their life decisions? Insurance, salary, job opportunities, etc. Makes sense to me.
Originally posted by st3ve_o
what makes a paedophile a paedophile? - its possible that the person had no experience with girls at school (wasn't popular), so to make up for it they are attracted to young girls/boys as an adult?
rape - i can't imagen someone with brad pitts looks would go around raping people!! - yet a person with no sexual experience might be drawn to rape.
Yolu know as well as I do that while there may be a corrolary, it's not worth opening the door to allow for persecution of people based on their looks.
I wonder if academics and scholars are more likely to be ugly? It would be a shame if our society started eliminating ugly folks, only to find out the hard way that intelligence and innovation aren't reliant on looks.
I understand the allure of attractiveness being used as a benchmark of social suitability, it's been that way for THOUSANDS of years. My point is that there are things besides clique compatibility and physical attractiveness that are of great use to society.
The standard of beauty is also not universal, by any stretch of the imagination, so there's another problem presented by what passes for their methodology. I can guarantee that my perception of beauty is not in synch with societal norms. I find Paris Hilton hideous to the point of hilarity. Do you understand the problem here?
Also, if you look at the methodology, there's no standard employed for determining who was attractive and who was not
I actually have a colleague at the university here who studied in an American medical school for a year, and she said it is surprisingly easy to get federal funding for a project, as compared to here in Italia. I did a quick google.it search for government funded projects in America and I discovered a huge breadth of topics being funded. I don't think the government, if it's anything like here, necessarily funds things just for personal gain. They fund them so if something good comes out of it, they can slap the government seal on it and call it theirs to an extent.
My single biggest problem with the 'reasearch' was the fact that the feds paid the tab for it. Why?! Why does the federal government need to commission investigations into the average criminality of ugly people?
Originally posted by WyrdeOne
Sounds to me like this is another in a long line of federally funded studies that are full of excrement. Not too long ago they released a study showing nobody gets raped in prison, rather, it's a process of sexual awakening.
I got thru the title, and through the first paragraph.....seems to be saying that ugly people are more prone to end up in mug shots and grow up to be criminals to me....
I mean, it's right there, in just about those words...