The face on Mars is a 1998 old internet topic. It gave the common folks a first inklings on the underhand tactics of Nasa when faced with anamolous
sightings, whom everyone trusted. Dig up on some old sites and you will get a group of diverse views covering intelligent analysis to disinformation
bunking to outright fantasies.
The debunkers will never hesitate to scream hoax at every believer's attempt to make sense of the images. One thing though, espacially the debunkers,
folks just dont realized that whatever comments offered were basically theories, no matter how august the source is, because - no one has landed
physically on the soil of Mars to comfirm the theories!
This is true with every so called 'peer reviewed' research paper writtened by scientists - its only theories and not facts for conditions in a
different environment may give different results. Therefore caution is advised. Remember the doc who wrote 'peer reviewed' articles on new genetic
manipulative discoveries? He was discovered a fraud much later. So delusive folks are not confined solely to the common folks, so too is NASA.
Here is a sampling of Nasa's underhand works, whom once was believed 100% but now, an entirely different case.
1. This is the image first released by Nasa, who with that flat sandbox drawn-like pic , used it to ridicule the believers of a face on Mars.
Debunkers had a field time laughing away. But believers felt something was wrong with the image.
1998 public media release
2. The believers then made a public outcry for the original viking mission overhead pic was definately not flat, and appealed to everyone who would
listen, from the man in the street to elected representatives to get a better image. Finally, Nasa bowed to public pressure and with much reluctance,
quietly released this pic from their website:-
Edit:- when this pic was released, Nasa covered up by giving all kinds of nonsensical public relations reasons for the previous 'flat' image's
released, but by then, the disinformation and debunking work had already been done and most of the public not informed chosed to believe the 1st
image.
So make up your own mind on what you are seeing. Do figure out how this mountain can occur in a totally flat area and the type of atmosphere that will
'carve' shapes on it to resemble a face and also take into consideration that erosion occurs to features over a period of time.
This was a first discovery of the way Nasa works with images, subsequently, several other images from them were found to be tampered, thus leading to
many questioning what other images had they been manipulating. Nothing new nowadays, Nasa lies all the time, even with the latest Deep Impact Tempe1
headline press release - water ice found on comet.
What really was the full truth was that NASA's theory on comets were that they were 'dirty snowballs' ( more ice than dirt ). Results of the impact
on the surface did show water, but 94% of it was dirt! A theory was wrong, and yet, they continued to spin and lie to a tax paying public who is
believed by NASA to be ignorant fools.....
Have fun with your mental journey to Mars.
[edit on 14-2-2006 by SeekerofTruth101]