It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Aux champs de Mede, d'Arabe et d'Armenie
Deux grands copies trois fois s'assembleront
Pres du rivage d'Araxes la mesnie
Du grand Soliman en terre tomberont
In the fields of Media, Arabe, and Armenia
Two great armies shall assemble three times
Near the Arabic shore or Persian Gulf
The Israelites on land shall tumble
COMMENT: Western armies shall pursue the Muslim armies all the way to Iranian soil or Middle East. The Jews shall be drawn into the conflict and shall suffer greatly.
Hisotorically the Arab Israeli conflict resulted from Arab intolerance to Jewish immigration into the land of Israel'
Originally posted by JudahMaccabbi
........
Secondly, Hisotorically the Arab Israeli conflict resulted from Arab intolerance to Jewish immigration into the land of Israel.
Zionism is political movement supporting the idea of the creation of a homeland in the land of Israel. Zionism did not intend to 'steal lands' from natives but create a homeland on unihabitated land. Information on the land of Israel at the time was the land was mostly unihabited as was observed from numerous newspaper articles and journal records from people such as Mark Twain in 1867.....
He never even talked about Palestinians but called them Syrians since, at the time, Palestine a a land did not exist but was considered southern province of Syria.
Friesian: THE OTTOMAN SULT.ÂNS AND CALIPHS, 1290-1924 AD
Israeli - Palestinian ProCon.org
With this said the general feeling was that 'Palestine' was relatively barren. The arable land in Palestine was mostly taken by the people there, the Palestinians. This forced the Jewish immigrants (remember there was also a large influx of Non-Jewish Arab imigrants as well which are wrongfully perceived to be Palesinians)
My feeling is that Muslims and Arabs in general are too proud a people to allow for a Jewish sovereignty in what they perceive as Arab land....
The posts here make it sound like Jews did not exist in the land of Israel prior to Zionism. This is false. Jews made-up a majority of Jerusalem (Israel's Largest city) since the early 1800s.
If you want to discuss violence in the land. The violence was actually initiated by the Arabs in the 1920s as a response to the Balfour declaration.
Jews responded to Arab riots and terrorist actions only in the late 1930s and this was by one organization 'the Irgun'. The first war was a war initiated by the Arabs. Arab nations themselves tried to persuade the Palestinian Arabs to leave their houses so it would be easier for the Arab armies to annhilate the Jews. This backfired on the Arabs and they are crying to this day about it.
That is the fact about violence and who initiated it. I am not saying that Israel is clean of blame. Israel has engaged in queastionable activities but I am suggesting that in comparison to the Palestinians and the Arabs Israel is much, much cleaner. The Arab world is caught up in the middle ages in terms of their ethics - this is true both now and in the past.
Originally posted by ArchAngel
What about the 1967 war where Israel invaded in a sneak attack?
Originally posted by ArchAngel
What about their racist immigration policies?
Originally posted by Riwka
Originally posted by ArchAngel
What about the 1967 war where Israel invaded in a sneak attack?
THAT again?
ArchAngel, this has been explained to you several times. for example here
Here's a quick summary of some of the major events leading up to the Six-Day War
and Here is Seekerofs posting dt 12-12-2005 on page 4 of this thread
1967 Arab-Israeli war + pre-emptive strike + 1967
define:pre-emptive strike
States have the right to make pre-emptive strikes on others
The Legality of Preemptive or Preventive Counterproliferation Strikes
The Palestinians are the victims.
Originally posted by ArchAngel
What about the ethics of denying freedom to more than four million people?
Originally posted by WyrdeOne
The Palestinians are the victims.
Yes, but of what? Their own decisions, certainly. The racism of Israeli Nationalists, certainly. But also victims of their class, and victims of nearby arab nations intent on perpetuating the situation for PR purposes, wouldn't you say?
What's so sad is that these people are kin. They've dwelt beside one another for thousands of years, and still can't manage to get along for the most part. The extremists on both sides polarize the debate and make compromise functionally impossible (though no less tempting an ideal, I'll admit).
Israeli Ministry of Foreign Affairs
Originally posted by Riwka
Originally posted by ArchAngel
What about the ethics of denying freedom to more than four million people?
Whom do you talking about?
The Arab Israeli citizens - or the people in the Palestine Authority who just choised to vote for the Terror group HAMAS in their last elections?
Election in the PA was just some days ago.....but some people have very short memory
Originally posted by Riwka
And THAT also again? This has also explained to you several times, for example, here:
Israel's Nationality Law relates to anyone wishing to settle in Israel, as well as those already residing or born there, regardless of race, religion, creed, sex or political beliefs.
Citizenship may be acquired by:
Birth
The Law of Return
Residence
Naturalization
Originally posted by ArchAngel
ONLY JEWS CAN IMMIGRATE
Originally posted by Riwka
Originally posted by ArchAngel
ONLY JEWS CAN IMMIGRATE
THAT again?
I highly recommend you'd read my posting again. Probably you are also intersted to look at the old discussion, where you still can find sources about immigration into the democratic Jewish State of Israel
Originally posted by ArchAngel
Why don't you paste it here
The 'actions' I mentioned: the use of overwhelming force as a deterrent shows questionable judgement, IMO. It hasn't worked yet anyway. Kids throwing stones at tanks, getting bullets between the eyes, that sort of thing. Levelling buildings because intelligence indicated one or more residents may be involved in terrorist activities.
Originally posted by Strangerous
I spotted this gem in your previous communiqué
'Secondly, Hisotorically the Arab Israeli conflict resulted from Arab intolerance to Jewish immigration into the land of Israel'
There's an obvious historical and geographic flaw in that point - surely you can see it.
Originally posted by ArchAngel
I am speaking of the Palestinians.
They had elections, but the Israeli military has not withdrawn.
They are still under foreign military occupation.
They are not Sovereign.
They are not Free.
And Israel is the one denying them their freedom no matter how you justify it.