This topic is in the Predictions & Prophecies discussion forum.  (rss)


future united states war with the u.n?




Topic started on 26-1-2006 @ 10:41 PM by exsmokingman


your thoughts guys? i've seen it mentioned as a possibility in science fiction.



reply to this post:   copyright & usage 


reply posted on 27-1-2006 @ 07:09 AM by RedDragon


i dont see it happening. if the un went to war with the us where would their funds come? we pratically are the un



reply to this post:   copyright & usage 


reply posted on 27-1-2006 @ 08:20 AM by Cynic



Originally posted by RedDragon
i dont see it happening. if the un went to war with the us where would their funds come? we pratically are the un



Right. This might be true after the US pays all the arrears dues they owe. It may be headquarted in New York, but the rest of the world is paying the bills.



reply to this post:   copyright & usage 


reply posted on 27-1-2006 @ 02:29 PM by syrinx high priest


is this a prediction or prophecy ?



reply to this post:   copyright & usage 


reply posted on 27-1-2006 @ 02:43 PM by Xerrog


I wouldn't be the least bit upset if we demolished that building.

Even less upset if we did it with all the politicians inside.



reply to this post:   copyright & usage 


reply posted on 27-1-2006 @ 03:03 PM by Cynic



Originally posted by Xerrog

I wouldn't be the least bit upset if we demolished that building.

Even less upset if we did it with all the politicians inside.




ROTFLMAO

Too bad it wouldn't include the real boneheads. Career diplomats do no a country run.



reply to this post:   copyright & usage 


reply posted on 28-1-2006 @ 06:56 PM by exsmokingman


for instance if usa were to invade iran rather than just . if israel were to join for instance then we would have the whole middle easterupting.destroying it's nuclear capability,the coalition of the willing will be very thin indeed. i can't think of any country that would definitely be a member

[edit on 28-1-2006 by exsmokingman]

[edit on 28-1-2006 by exsmokingman]



reply to this post:   copyright & usage 


reply posted on 28-1-2006 @ 09:53 PM by JoshGator54



Originally posted by Cynic

Right. This might be true after the US pays all the arrears dues they owe. It may be headquarted in New York, but the rest of the world is paying the bills.



"Ever since the U.N. was created in 1945, the United States has been its biggest contributor. The United States currently contributes 22 percent of the U.N.'s regular budget. In contrast, France contributes 6.4 percent, Britain 5.54 percent, China 1.53 percent, and Russia 1.2 percent. Three nations--the United States, Japan, and Germany--contribute a disproportionately large amount of money to the U.N. regular budget: 51.3 percent of the total.6

Moreover, despite its high level of funding for the U.N., the United States is underrepresented in terms of U.N. personnel. American citizens make up just 7.2 percent of the total.7

U.S. contributions to the U.N. system in 2001 totaled $3.5 billion, including $612 million in assessed contributions to the U.N. regular budget, $712 million toward U.N. peacekeeping, and $2.2 billion in voluntary contributions.8

In the past decade, the U.S. has spent substantial sums of money supporting United Nations peacekeeping operations worldwide. According to the U.S. General Accounting Office, the Department of State and Department of Defense gave the U.N. $3.45 billion in direct contributions to conduct peacekeeping operations between 1996 and 2001.9 This figure is dwarfed by the estimated $24.2 billion in indirect contributions10 made by the U.S. government to help support 33 U.N. peacekeeping operations in 28 countries during that five-year period."

6. Figures cited in Vita Bite, "UN System Funding: Congressional Issues," Congressional Research Service, September 10, 2003.

7. U.S. General Accounting Office, United Nations: Targeted Strategies Could Help Boost U.S. Representation, GAO-01-839, July 2001, p. 12.

8. Ibid. Voluntary contributions go toward specialist U.N. programs such as the United Nations Children's Fund (UNICEF) and the United Nations Development Program.

9. U.S. General Accounting Office, U.N. Peacekeeping: Estimated U.S. Contributions, Fiscal Years 1996-2001, GAO-02-294, February 2002.

10. The GAO defines indirect contributions as "U.S. programs and activities that (1) are located in the same area as an ongoing U.N. peacekeeping operation, (2) have objectives that help the peacekeeping operation achieve its mandated objectives, and (3) are not an official part of the UN operation." Ibid., p. 5.



www.heritage.org...

Cynic - this is a look at how much money the US is throwing down the drain at the U.N.

Edited to fix quote tags.

[edit on 19-4-2006 by mrwupy]



reply to this post:   copyright & usage 


reply posted on 29-1-2006 @ 04:25 AM by exsmokingman


josh gator? usa puts the most money in? don't see how that is relevant to the topic.



reply to this post:   copyright & usage 


reply posted on 29-1-2006 @ 04:33 AM by wang


You dont see how it is relevant?
You are saying that the U.S.A. could go to war with the U.N. and someone states how the U.S. is the largest contributor to the U.N. and its not relevant?
Why would the U.S. go to war with the U.N.?



reply to this post:   copyright & usage 


reply posted on 29-1-2006 @ 09:58 AM by Cynic


Puhleazzzzzze Gator!

The US might be the largest "assessed" country. They are however, way past due on their bills.

Apparantly they are occupied elsewhere in the world doing good works for the UN? They just left their wallet in their other pants, right??

Cut me a break.



[edit on 29-1-2006 by Cynic]



reply to this post:   copyright & usage 


reply posted on 1-2-2006 @ 06:53 PM by JoshGator54


Cynic,

If we are withholding dues then that is great. The sooner the UN's funds dry up the better. The organization is one of the largest failures of our time.

The sad thing is we really need an organization to provide food and aid to those who need it throughout the world. The UN is more interested in making deals with dictators and lining their pockets with the blood money.


Exsmokinggun,

The point is that war is not necessary to defeat the UN. Withdraw our funding and we have cut 22% of their budget. How effective would they be then?



reply to this post:   copyright & usage 


reply posted on 1-2-2006 @ 08:50 PM by exsmokingman


elsewhere. money is largely an illusion. you sound supremely confident, you'll be in the front rank then i guess.



reply to this post:   copyright & usage 


reply posted on 3-3-2006 @ 08:50 PM by thesnafued1



Originally posted by exsmokingman
elsewhere. money is largely an illusion. you sound supremely confident, you'll be in the front rank then i guess.


Where is elsewhere? The Tsunamia hit, who donates the most, who sends the most aid? The US not france, germany, romania, china or uganda. Money is a illusion? How so? Money is the most powerful tool man has created. does that make a hammer a part of my imagination?



reply to this post:   copyright & usage 


reply posted on 19-4-2006 @ 01:49 PM by tracer


Im with Josh, the sooner the UN ceases to exist the better off the world as a whole will be. However I really dont see that happening as this monster just continues to grow and gain more power as it grows, just an evil organization that needs to be stopped.



reply to this post:   copyright & usage 










Top Topics Right Now:



Active Topics Right Now:



ATS MIX Podcasts:











Newest Topics:























ATS Thread Tag System
Members can add a custom descriptive tag to any thread on ATS. Thread Tags will help categorize our site content, help to cross-reference similar threads, and improve the searchability of all ATS threads. This thread is currently defined by these tags:

, , , , ,
















ATS Server: www2.theabovenetwork.com
Powered by AboveTop:Board v2.3
Header data processed in 0.002 seconds
Page processed in 0.102 seconds
7 total database queries (1)









The Above Top Secret Conspiracy Community Web site is a wholly owned social content community of The Above Network, LLC.





thread