Seems like debunkers reserve sole rights to comment on others' post, but when others reply back, they are deemed 'having serious issues!'.
Rather than to waste time mudslinging, which is often debunkers and DIA intentions to sidetrack issues, i would rather concentrate on the main topic
on hand.
As in all offense activities, criminals will never admit to their crime, be it a parking violation or murder and will steadfastedly deny all knowledge
of their crime. It would be up to judical procedures to present evidence to the judge and jury on offenders caught. Therefore, going by the logic of
'nullster', are judges and juries guilty of speculations when they mete out sentences base on evidences? Seems 'nullster' does have a problem with
'due process'!
In the case of UFOs, i would readily admit it would be an uphill task if govts do not provide full disclosure to the aerial phenomena. The avaliable
data are evidences from people from all walks of life, right up to now the Iron Curtain Russia opening up its UFO files and even of a President of
US-the commander in chief and owner of the most military powerful nation on Earth- who filed an UFO report. The fact remains - there's UFOs up there
and it aint us!
Many reasonable people have no wish to speculate, but based on the proof and evidences currently avaliable, i, a member of the jury, can only mete out
the conclusion that UFOs are non- terresterial at this time.
Of course, there is no requirement that other jury members think as i do. However, to be a jury member, one must be objective, rationale of mind,
critically self analyse avaliable data to come to a logical conclusion, no matter how hard the truth is to swallow. Not everyone can do that, it
seems.
Theox
1) Actually there's a whole pile of countries that can claim stuff in their skies is
not theirs. SR71s and satellites are are only the property of one or a few nations.
2) U2s and Francis Gary Powers prove otherwise.
3) The same can be said of ball lightning.
4) Who is piloting UAVs? FAA violations are a daily occurrence, not all are caug
1. You do not know what you are talking about. Do some reading first. Do not confuse SR71 and satellites with UFO
2. U2s and Francis Gary Powers were of the 60s cold war culture and subsequent national embarassment. Do some reading up prior to commenting. The
president has apologised to all concerned and have declared never to do such 'overflights' again when not in a state of war, unless you are claiming
that Presidents were lying to the world.
3. Ball lightning is still considered a myth to the scientific community and do not appear on radar as a regular moving object, nor have distinctive
shapes, nor appear in broad clear blue skies daylight, nor fly in formations. Try blimps or the star venus next.
4. Who controls UAVS? Whose UAV are those? Where are the designs of airplane sized UAVs? Where are the patents lodged for such dynamic propulsion
systems used? Do read up more prior to commenting please cos posting your speculations as an attempt at reality only insults our intelligence in this
discussion forum. Ask any pilot you know if they have ever gotten away with FAA violations - filing flight path, registration, etc. If you dont have
any pilot friends, try talking up to one near a bar in an airforce base. It may help clear your ignorance and be an asset to this board. Cheers!
[edit on 28-1-2006 by SeekerofTruth101]