It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by waynos
Kilcoo got what I was asking straight away
Originally posted by Shadowhawk
Burt Rutan is a brilliant and innovative airplane designer, but he is a bit of a blowhard. He takes every opportunity to publicly bash NASA. Meanwhile, he gladly accepts every NASA contract he can get his hands on. I guess he doesn't mind taking NASA's money.
Originally posted by UofCinLA
As others have pointed out, you could de-orbit and burn fuel to reduce the re-entry speed to something managable but the fuel required to do so is enormous.
Originally posted by kilcoo316
Originally posted by BigTrain
As for comparing the shuttle to the spaceshipone, that is like comparing a ferrari to a bicycle. Spaceshipone did nothing but fly str8 up to 62 miles and then fell str8 back down, this included no level flight out of the atmosphere and no re-entry.
- Again, a dubious comparison, its lack of mission flexibility is directly a result of budget constraints.
Ok, to deorbit the shuttle in the same manner as spaceshipone is not a straightforward process, all (or at least the vast majority of) angular motion (with respect to the earth's centre) has to be arrested, then a controlled vertical descent can begin. The shuttle currently uses the earths atmosphere for this - however, it maybe alot more feasible now than it was then to use a rocket.
Anyway, got another suggestion for future use. Its been quite well documented the effects of a plasma field on reducing drag (thus friction, and heating) - so perhaps future designs will look at incorporating this as a means of reducing skin temperatures to a point where stronger/more damage tolerant materials can be used, reducing the risk.
Originally posted by looofo
Ba reducing drag you reduce heat but as it takes longer to brake I dont know if this gets a lot better
Originally posted by BigTrain
The x-prize was given to him because, he exploited the contest. The x-prize was intended for LEO, he used the loophole and fact they never clarified the 62 mile boundary. He cheated the other teams out of 10 million.
Originally posted by BigTrain
Im sure a bird isnt going through 4 inch solid ceramic reinforced, and foam or anything else for that matter. I still see no reason why there are 30,000 tiles on the shuttle. Train
While a team of aerospace engineers takes aim this week on the $10 million Ansari X Prize competition for privately developed suborbital spaceflight, a Nevada millionaire is planning an even loftier contest.
Robert Bigelow, chief of Las Vegas-based Bigelow Aerospace, is apparently setting higher goals for private spaceflight endeavors with America's Space Prize, a $50 million race to build an orbital vehicle capable of carrying up to seven astronauts to an orbital outpost by the end of the decade, according to Aviation Week and Space Technology.