It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Editor & Publisher
The abduction of a Christian Science Monitor reporter in Iraq on Saturday was not disclosed by major U.S. media outlets for nearly two days after the Monitor requested that the incident, and the reporter's name and affiliation, be withheld. A translator was killed in the incident and the reporter, now identified by the Monitor as Jill Carroll, is still being held.
Numerous foreign news outlets and several leading wire services disclosed the incident -- and in a few cases, the reporter's name. Such stories did not appear in The New York Times, The Washington Post, Los Angeles Times, and other U.S. papers and their Web sites.
The Associated Press ran at least one story out of Baghdad, but without the newspaper or reporter's name, and it did not appear in any major newspapers Sunday or Monday. The AP held off all further reports at the request of the Monitor, which did not release the information until this afternoon.
"Jill is an established journalist who has been reporting from the Middle East for Jordanian, Italian, and other news organizations over the past three years," the Monitor reported in a story to be published on Tuesday. "In recent months, The Monitor has tapped into her professionalism, energy, and fair reporting on the Iraq scene. It was her drive to gather direct and accurate views from political leaders that took her into western Baghdad's Adil neighborhood on Saturday morning."
Originally posted by NumberCruncher
I posted this two days ago .... but it makes sense to keep the fact hidden if they actually did, what leverage for the Terrorists to have an American journo captured.
Originally posted by NumberCruncher
I posted this two days ago .... but it makes sense to keep the fact hidden if they actually did, what leverage for the Terrorists to have an American journo captured.
Originally posted by mad scientist
Indeed it does, the more press she gets the more valuable she becomes to the terrorists, making her release through negotiation that much harder.
Originally posted by Souljah
Originally posted by NumberCruncher
I posted this two days ago .... but it makes sense to keep the fact hidden if they actually did, what leverage for the Terrorists to have an American journo captured.
You have?
I am sorry, I must have Missed it - can you please provide the Link?
Thanks!
Originally posted by NumberCruncher
Sure thing, was on a Scottish news site, so i cant speak for how much press it did/didnt get in the USA.
www.abovetopsecret.com...
Originally posted by esdad71
Maybe she was on to something, such as a something to report about Iraq and the insturgency. I REALLY, REALLY hope that you are not implying the US did this Souljah. Personal opinion is one thing, accusing the US of kidnapping a CSM reporter is quite another. You are going out of bounds on that commment.
Originally posted by Crakeur
souljah, read your quote again. The Christian Science Monitor (her employer) requested the blackout for two days.
Carroll was seized by gunmen Saturday while reporting on efforts by Iraqi politicians to form a new government. She was leaving the headquarters of a Sunni political party by car when she was confronted in one of the city's most dangerous neighborhoods. Her Iraqi interpreter, Allan Enwiyah, 32, was killed in the attack, but her driver escaped without injury.
There was fear that her affiliation with a paper with the word “Christian” in the title might cause her captors to treat her harshly. After two days however, the Monitor ran a story of its own and other media organizations followed suit. “Jill worked for a lot of newspapers and media from many countries,” Ingwerson told E&P. “She is not a Monitor staffer.”
Originally posted by esdad71
There was fear that her affiliation with a paper with the word “Christian” in the title might cause her captors to treat her harshly. After two days however, the Monitor ran a story of its own and other media organizations followed suit. “Jill worked for a lot of newspapers and media from many countries,” Ingwerson told E&P. “She is not a Monitor staffer.”
And here is an explanation about the blackout, make a little more sense now?
Originally posted by Souljah
I am not IMPLYING anything - I just mentioned, that she was maybe ON to something, and maybe that was the Reason behind her Abduction.
:
Imply
2 : to involve or indicate by inference, association, or necessary consequence rather than by direct statement