The more I'm thinking about this, the more it's bothering me. So far this thread has consisted of several ways of calling a person nuts, prohpets
claiming he'll get his, and assumptions that a controversial talk show host in this regard should be removed from "power", but there hasn't really
been any discussion on what he said and why. Why not?
Well, apparently the thought police have hit the airwaves in force, and many, myself included, dutifly condemned where we were told to condemn without
looking into the issue ourselves. We assume that, because Robertson says some pretty wild and, I would contend, foolish things (e.x. "Feminism
encourages women to leave their husbands, kill their children, practice witchcraft, destroy capitalism and become lesbians." - 1992 GOP Convention),
we must condemn him any time he opens his mouth.
The more I'm thinking about this, the more it's bothering me. So far this thread has consisted of several ways of calling a person nuts, prophets
claiming he'll get his, and assumptions that a controversial talk show host in this regard should be removed from "power", but there hasn't really
been any discussion on what he said and why. Why not?
Well, apparently the thought police have hit the airwaves in force, and many, myself included, dutifully condemned where we were told to condemn
without looking into the issue ourselves. We assume that, because Robertson says some pretty wild and, I would contend, foolish things (e.x.
"Feminism encourages women to leave their husbands, kill their children, practice witchcraft, destroy capitalism and become lesbians." - 1992 GOP
Convention), we must condemn him any time he opens his mouth.
So what did Pat Robertson say that was so outlandish and horrible, deserving, as some have alluded to here, death for? Here's the full context of the
quote:
"Ladies and Gentlemen I said last year that Israel was entering into the most dangerous periods of its entire existence as a nation. That is
intensifying this year with the loss of Sharon. Sharon was personally a very likeable person and I am sad to see him in this condition, but I think we
need to look at the Bible and the Book of Joel. The prophet Joel makes it very clear that God has enmity against those who 'divide my land.' God
considers this land to be His. You read the Bible and He says 'this is my land' and for any Prime Minister of Israel who decides he is going to
carve it up and give it away, God says 'no, this is mine.' I had a wonderful meeting with Yitzhak Rabin in 1974. He was tragically assassinated, it
was a terrible thing that happened but nevertheless he was dead. And now Ariel Sharon who again was a very likeable person, a delightful person to be
with, I prayed with him personally, but here he's at the point of death. He was dividing God's land and I would say woe unto any Prime Minister of
Israel who takes a similar course to appease the EU, the United Nations, or the United States of America. God says 'this land belongs to me. You'd
better leave it alone.'"
Source
If one of our members were to say that and we were to react as we have on this thread, there would be several warns, at least. Pat Robertson related
what took place to the Bible, specifically the book of Joel. The prophet Joel talks about the price for dividing God's land, Israel. He then goes on
to mention the other Israeli prime minister who had given away parts of Israel, Rabin. What was his fate? Assassination. Now the other prime minister
who did the same thing, Sharon, lies in a medically induced coma brought on by a stroke. Robertson drew a connection here. He made a claim, albeit a
controversial one. He supported his claim with evidence and reason to believe it. Is he right? I don't think so, but who knows, we're not going to
discuss what he said, only that he's a crazy idiot that needs to die.
Why do we let the media and others do our thinking for us? Why do we allow them to decide what ideas can be discussed and what ideas can't be? Is
condemning an idea because it comes from a questionable source, no matter the validity of the idea, really denying ignorance?
Shame on all of us.