It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by Harlequin
as you have said yourself wind and temperature condtions have to right - which of course tactical planning will take in to effect.
1 mile IS enough to effect collateral damage when using BAC agents. The persistance of BAC agents is much greater than radiological agents
scrap teh top meter and seal it , and that's the rad count dealt with (they did that after the ground burts test in new mexico) the problem with bio agents and chem agents is the fact that it gets everywhere and `sticks` to everything , even when you decom , say a fence , you have to spray , over , under and along every single part - and twice just to make sure.
Radiation im not scarred about - i have been trained to deal with it , i know pattern spreads and 1/2 life and measures of containment.
bio wepaons and chem weapons IMO are far more dangerous as many are very resistant to being decom`d.
there has been enough talk on russia aiding the muslim world against western `agression` and yes i know that russia doesn`t border iran - turkmenistan does , but as a former soviet state , `mother russia` will respond to any calls for aid (when the clouds drift accross the border as an example)
I still have an iusse of range - this would have to be HI-LO-LO mission - they couldn`t go HI again after the raid as every SAM would be tracking them on the way out and the F-14`s would be running awacs as well.They would have to tank at the border on teh way AND on the way out , and run in mach busting the whole time ; this time its different to the last time israel bombed the reactor.
I wasn`t aware that 2 potential enemies train together in more than `red flag` exercies - turkey is part of nato , israel isn`t. You do know that turkey is still fighting the kurds to try and stop them forming there own country , ceeding away from iraq don`t you?
i`ve seen what properly set explosives can do - how little you really need to do an effective job - but that requires someone to be on the ground next to the darn thing in the first place - hmmmm HALO mossad agents would possibly be a better proposal than the sky full of burning aircraft.
Originally posted by mad scientist
Originally posted by longbow
I don't know why all that talk about the war. Simply block Iranian exports (including oil) until they stop their nuclear program and accept UN inspections. After few months their economy will be in big trouble, and they will ceratainly have no money for their WMD toys.
[edit on 2-1-2006 by longbow]
Well blocking their oil exports is far harder than it sounds and would have repercussions around the world. For example in 2002 China imported 10 million tons of oil from Iran, which is about 15% of their total imports. The Chinese wouldn't be very happy about that. That in turn would affect all the cheap goods sold in Walmart et al, in the US.
Well if it's a retaliatory attack they won't be able to choose the right timing. Therefore relying on pot luck.
Bacterial agents are very hard to store in warheads
Hmm, well I'm sure SAM positions have been carefully plotted and a course would be planned to take these into account. For all the vaunted claims of the Russian S-300 it's yet to see any combat
Since when does Iran have AWACS ? As for the F-14's they aren't in very good repair. 25 years with no factory support
Originally posted by longbow
Actually everything you said makes this possibility to look better and better . And "cheap goods" can be imported from everywhere (Vietnam, Philipines, Mexico...). There was much less chinese imports in mid nineties and where was the difference? Banning all Chinese imports would the the best thing US can do.
Originally posted by Harlequin
Bacterial agents are very hard to store in warheads
yes , that is true , but Anthrax isn`t my first choice of agent - i would rather look at strains of ebola , or ricin or smallpox - ebola being my prefered choice (or CCHF as well) but the method of delviery is somewhat harder with ebola or CCHF , as you cannot really air spray them.
chemical agents ; the question is , what was used on them during the iran - iraq war and do they have any methylphosphonothioic acid (V agent)available? do they have any phogene agents? lung damage and drowning in your own bloody as the lungs collapse are the usual cause of death for this lot - again nasty stuff.
heck even mustard gas is very persistant , and of course with it being a blistering agent will cause death to anyone not in protection
delivery systems? rockets , shells , drums in cargo pplanes that sort of thing
The F-14`s have been kept flying using russian engines and tech - IIRC the AIM54`s use russian rocket motors now - they can field just about all teh ones they got.
and the S-300 - yes it hasn`t been tested yet , but if every claim from every manufacturer was to be believed then there was nothing left flying after day 1 of the gulf war and every ground target was hit first time everytime!
Originally posted by Harlequin
and i totally disagree about V agents needing thousands of tonnes - more like a cup full to be horribly effective , it IS that nasty.
Originally posted by Harlequin
no , VX is american - other countries produce V Agents that are comparable or even nastier (russia for example) - its the way that its made and i put russia way ahead of teh usa when it comes to chemical weapons - most of there wat plans involved chemical agents of one form or anohter; the usa would rely on nukes , russia it was chemical bombs.
...Iran is complying with the nuclear watchdog as the inspectors are at the palces the Israelies want to bomb.
In October 1991, Vil S. Mirzayanov, a chemist who had worked for more than 25 years in the Soviet CW program, alleged that Moscow had developed a series of new and extremely lethal "third generation" nerve agents under a secret program code-named Foliant. His assertions were confirmed by two other scientists, Lev A. Fedorov and Vladimir Uglev. It was also claimed that Russia was working on developing new binary chemical warfare agents under the designation Novichok ["New Guy"]. Mirzayanov alleged that Russia intended to test and produce binary chemical weapons after ratification of the Chemical Weapons Convention. He was jailed in 1992 and 1993, though the US protested his arrest and the case against him was dismissed. After the Mirzayanov scandal, this work was officially reported to be suspended.
thats from november - and its a visit to a military base.
edit: the inspectors might not be at those palces 24/7 BUT you cannot just get rid of tests easily , the evidence lasts for along time