BUSINESS: "Brownie" Starts Disaster Consulting Business, page 2
Pages: <<  1    2  >>
ATS Members have flagged this thread 0 times


reply posted on 26-11-2005 @ 08:02 AM by SkepticOverlord
Originally posted by GradyPhilpott
I'm not trying to vindicate Brown so much as I am acknowledging that he alone does not bear the blame for Katrina, if indeed there has to be blame.

Who else should be blamed (there has to be) but the head of the agency responsible for responding to catastrophic emergencies? He left a paper trail of inept indifference and political scandal. No amount of the disingenuous positive spin from you or other official party apologists will overcome that.


An enormous storm plowed into the Gulf coast and devastated Louisiana and Mississippi and in Mississippi the damage extended for perhaps a hundred miles inland or more.

Indeed. This is the rote "apologist line" we keep hearing. And this is very true. However, the agency for which Brown was charged could at least make the appearance of being prepared to respond to an overwhelming catastrophe. We can forgive a haphazard response if there was an obvious attempt to make a serious effort... but there was no such attempt.


In New Orleans, the levees were breeched and the city filled up like a bowl. St. Bernard Parish was wiped out. Plaquimines Parish fared no better. Moses could not have done much better, in my opinion.

And you describe the "disaster scenario" that has been mapped out in more than one study on the effects of a hurricane on the area. It was known what could happen, and the massive storm took days to arrive.


A stronger personality could have, perhaps, provided better leadership, but even then there could not have been amassed the kinds of resources needed in such a circumstance.

I'm sorry Grady, I admire your devoted tenacity, but this smells intensely of bovine excrement. Again, all that needed to happen to prevent this kind of post-catastrophe analysis was a visible effort... any effort.


His name is synonymous with incompetence.

As it should be.


Should we revel in his misery?

What about the misery of thousands he is personally responsible for either creating or making worse? I really think your original submission to ATSNN is an inaccurate attempt to spin positive something that cannot be. I'm very concerned that members of ATS would seek to do such a thing.


reply posted on 26-11-2005 @ 10:01 AM by Icarus Rising
You know who should start a disaster consulting business, based on positive results? I hate to say this, but FEMA could stand to take a few lessons from the Cuban government!


OCHA Situation Report No. 5
Hurricane Dennis - Cuba
11 July 2005

4. According to official figures received from the National Civil Defense, 10 persons have been killed, while 1,535,545 have been evacuated, of which 129,626 were students and 16,873 tourists. Major damages are reported in the housing, agriculture electricity, water supply, telecommunication and transportation sectors.


Source

I'm no fan of Castro or Communism, but I am a fan of getting people to safety in times of life threatening emergencies and national disasters. I don't really care who does it, or how it gets done, as long as it happens.

The big excuse for the delayed response to New Orleans was the looting and violence.

The November Harper's Index sites this New Orleans Coroner's Office statistic:


Number of the 1035 confirmed Hurricane Katrina-related deaths that were caused by gunfire: 8


So that claim just doesn't hold up to statistical scrutiny.

Was Brown 'just following orders' after Katrina, like he did in Florida in 2004 when he handed out all that relief aid in Miami-Dade? Is FEMA's current mandate more directed at securing the loyalty of likely Republican voters than it is at providing disaster relief? Are likely Democratic voters somehow deemed less deserving of that relief? I shudder to think it.

This is not how our government was designed to function!

Pages: <<  1    2  >>    ^^TOP^^