 |
reply posted on 20-9-2003 @ 03:38 PM by FULCRUM
|
First combat use:
Operation Just Cause 1989 Panama.
That was also first time US gov. admited that F-117 did infact exist.
 Six F-117As flew non-stop from Tonopah Nevada with air refueling to attack the Rio Hato barracks in Panama, two of them dropped GBU-27
bombs. 
This happened on Dec. 19. 1989..
And this was not a 'actual bombing strike' as the purpose of these sorties and bombings was only to 'route' the Panamians, not to kill them.
|
reply to this post:
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 20-9-2003 @ 03:47 PM by quaneeri
|
Originally posted by Zion Mainframe
Originally posted by FULCRUM
Then we should get one, a 'aircraft chit chat forum'..
And to there we could also move some of the 'topics' that have gone 'little' out of topic.. or?
To me this seems as a great idea.. 
I requested it in the moderator forum, lets wait and see what happens  I think it would be a great addition to the aircraft forum!! 
I agree, i am all for the chit chat forum.
FULCRUM.
Yeah i can see your page, now i understand.
Access Blocked:
The only thing i can think of, is that they may be reading your computer with a cookie first, and then blocking access.
My FIREWALL won't let them do that. ????
|
reply to this post:
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 20-9-2003 @ 04:10 PM by quaneeri
|
|
reply to this post:
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 21-9-2003 @ 12:21 AM by SectorGaza
|
bowling anyone?
|
reply to this post:
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 21-9-2003 @ 12:38 AM by THENEO
|
Zion M,
is it possible that the US has leap frogged the Russians by going to anti-grav technology thus not requiring the plasma system the Russians are not
trying to develop.
Please note, I always take claims that Russians make with a grain of salt until I actually see it for myself because they seem to be big dreamers.
|
reply to this post:
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 21-9-2003 @ 01:09 AM by DeltaNine
|
Ok Zion, Ill think about what Im trying to achieve next time I start a thread. My opening post wasnt really appropriate.
|
reply to this post:
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 21-9-2003 @ 06:16 AM by Lampyridae
|
Originally posted by THENEO
Zion M,
is it possible that the US has leap frogged the Russians by going to anti-grav technology thus not requiring the plasma system the Russians are not
trying to develop.
Please note, I always take claims that Russians make with a grain of salt until I actually see it for myself because they seem to be big dreamers.

Plasma system? This is the first I've heard of it. Of Russian anti-grav, I've heard nothing. However, the Rusisians' NK-33 booster had higher
efficiency than the shuttles' main engines, simply due to the Russians' willingness to take a risk with a crazy idea - using oxidizer to cool the
exhaust lining, which was simply considered too dangerous to ever work by their American counterparts...
[Edited on 21-9-2003 by Lampyridae]
|
reply to this post:
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 21-9-2003 @ 06:29 AM by Lampyridae
|
Question: does anybody know of any flight sims which let you fly the F-117 or the B-2? Preferably with realistic flight characteristics!
(As if the US Air Force would let the likes of NovaLogic poke around the B-2's cockpit)
|
reply to this post:
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 21-9-2003 @ 06:31 AM by Lampyridae
|
Originally posted by Zion Mainframe
Well an aircraft chit chat forum would have potential, but a special aircraft research forum is out of the question.
That's what the research forum was introduced for...
We seriously could (should) have a research project on the B-2's anti-gravity technlogy!
I remember that Simon has/had some very interesting information on that... 
That sounds like a good idea. Why don't you push for it?
|
reply to this post:
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 21-9-2003 @ 06:47 AM by DeltaNine
|
Theres a number of A/C you can download for Flight sim 02/04 including the stealth A/C.
I support the reasearch project.
|
reply to this post:
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 23-9-2003 @ 07:13 AM by ghost
|
F-117
The F-117 is a very very basic aircraft! You have to remember that it was originly built useing off the shelf systems. As originally built, the F-117
didn't even have Radar or a stealth compatibal communication system, pilots had to turn off the plane's radio before entering enemy airspace.
Now as for the B-2 research project I'd like to help if I can!
Tim
|
reply to this post:
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 23-9-2003 @ 09:03 AM by FULCRUM
|
Originally posted by ghost
The F-117 is a very very basic aircraft! You have to remember that it was originly built useing off the shelf systems. As originally built, the F-117
didn't even have Radar or a stealth compatibal communication system, pilots had to turn off the plane's radio before entering enemy airspace.
Now as for the B-2 research project I'd like to help if I can!
Tim 
It uses A-10A nose gear, F-15E main wheels, standars ACES ejection seat, MFDs from F-18 and F-16 FBW system. Thats for the off-the-self systems.
And the plane has no radar.. thats the beauty of it.. mades it hard to detect by passive means..
|
reply to this post:
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 23-9-2003 @ 09:57 AM by Zion Mainframe
|
Originally posted by ghost
Now as for the B-2 research project I'd like to help if I can!

I asked dragonrider if it was allright to start a new the B2 project. I'll u2u several members who are interested in participating in this research
project.
I'm often quite busy with school, so I'm not sure yet if I should be the project leader, I'll have to think about that.
more on this project later...
|
reply to this post:
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 23-9-2003 @ 10:03 AM by DeltaNine
|
Put me down on the list too Zion. I have lots of time to think on night shift now. No internet anymore, but thinking time. The wankers LOL.
|
reply to this post:
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 23-9-2003 @ 10:21 AM by FULCRUM
|
Well i do have a 'Air international' that has the specs for the B-2 anti-gravity 'system..'
But i am also intressed that are we going to get the 'aircraft chit chat' or no?
|
reply to this post:
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 23-9-2003 @ 10:23 AM by Zion Mainframe
|
I asked it in the moderator forum three days ago, and I "bumped" that thread yesterday, but still no reply
I'll bump it again
|
reply to this post:
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 23-9-2003 @ 11:53 AM by Zion Mainframe
|
okay, so who else wants to join the B-2 anti-gravity research project?
The team so far is:
Fulcrum,DeltaNine, ghost and myself
Reply to this thread please!
www.abovetopsecret.com...
|
reply to this post:
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 23-9-2003 @ 12:13 PM by Zzub
|
I'd love to, but I'm not sure what I could do for you.
|
reply to this post:
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 23-9-2003 @ 02:09 PM by SectorGaza
|
"Testing indicated that B-2s are also sensitive to extreme climates, water, and humidity-- exposure to water or moisture can damage some of the
low-observable enhancing surfaces on the aircraft. Further, exposure to water or moisture that causes water to accumulate in aircraft compartments,
ducts, and valves can cause systems to malfunction. If accumulated water freezes, it can take up to 24 hours to thaw and drain. Air Force officials
said it is unlikely that the aircraft's sensitivity to moisture and climates or the need for controlled environments to fix low-observability
problems will ever be fully resolved, even with improved materials and repair processes. Therefore, if B-2s are to be deployed, some form of aircraft
sheltering at a forward operating location will likely become a requirement in the future. "
".... the B-2 must be sheltered or exposed only to the most benign environments (low humidity, no precipitation, moderate temperatures). According to
B-2 Combined Test Force officials, permanent shelters at deployed locations are required.... it appears that effective operations from a forward
operation location will require additional facilities and equipment not included in the original plan. The Air Force is still working to identify
these additional requirements."
"Air Force test officials stated that maintenance of low-observable features is an issue that requires significant further study and that the
percentage of maintenance hours required to repair low-observable materials would increase even more before there are reductions."
"Problems with low-observable materials have also affected the percentage of time the B-2 was partially or fully capable of completing a mission,
which was significantly less when low observability was considered. When low observability was not considered, the mission-capable rate was 66 percent
for a 12-month period ending March 1997. However, when low-observability problems were considered for the same period of time, the rate dropped
significantly to 26 percent. "
|
reply to this post:
copyright & usage
|
 |