Halfo -- Stop trying to redefine what evolution is.
According to evolution life arose spontaneously in the soup. (no God)
Dead matter came to life on its own without God. All evolutionists believe this.
Second, once the dead matter that accidentally clumped together was struck by lightening or whatever they think might have done it in the soup BY
ACCIDENT, then this very, very low-life creature started "evolving."
All evolutionists believe all living creatures come from this one "thing" in the soup, something less than a cell, some protein, some thing they
have claimed to have been able to duplicate in the lab. Of course this thing they duplicate in the lab is DEAD, but that's okay. The evolutionist
says somehow if you hit it right with some heat or electricity or whatever that this will come to life.
Then they say this thing kept on adding more and more DNA and changing from one kind to another, many plants kept splitting off from other plants.
Then the plants began to turn into fish. The fish began to turn into reptiles. The reptiles crawled up on the land and turned into birds. The birds
turned into mammals. The mammals finally evolved up the chain into monkeys and from there we get humans.
This is what they believe.
In reality what do we see? Do we see anything turning into something else? No. Everything is as it is, all perfectly formed. If evolution were
occuring, woul it not be still occurring? Would we not see creatures half-way formed as they are morphing into something else? A milkweed
caterpiller goes into a pupa and in two weeks emerges as a butterfly. While it's in the pupa it is a mushy mess as it morphs into the butterfly.
Why don't we see any "pupa-like" creatures in real life? Only in the life of Disneyland of the evolutionist, with their artist renderings do we
see these depictures of things "evolving." They say the dinosaurs turned into birds. Ha. Sure they did. The big haunches shriveled up and became
little bird stick-legs, and the puny little forelegs turned into big wings. The scales became feathers. The teeth fell out and the mouth turned
into a beak, on and on. It's beyond ludicrous but it's what they believe.
I hate to use the word, but the word microevolution comes up here. Microevolution is speciation. Speciation comes from the parent or kind, a
splitting off. The genetic material was already there, put there by God. Evolutionists say mutation causes evolution, causes the simple to become
complex. But speciation causes simplification (speciation) when you have a loss
genetic material when a species is split off from the parent.
This species may or may not be able to breed with the parent kind or with other species coming from the parent kind. There is a LOSS OF GENETIC
MATERIAL in speciation.
One kind cannot turn into another kind because there is no genetic material there for that to happen. A turnip will never become a bumblebee.
Mutation results in damage to or loss of genetic material. Never
does it result in the creation of new genetic material. Most mutations
result in stillbirths or deformities. They most assuredly do not result in the production of a new "kind" or "family." And speciation is not
technically a mutation. It is a splitting or a natural emerging of genetic combinations that were already within the parent kind, put there by
If you want to say you believe in evolution but in God too -- where do you draw the line? Where does God come into the picture? Did God create a
bunch of atoms and then stand back and wait to see what happened? Did the atoms clump together by accident to form the earth, sun and moon that are
perfectly sized and distanced from each other to support life on earth? Do you give God the credit for that part of creation? Then afterwards, did
God just stand back and see what might arise all by itself on Planet Earth? Where does life come from? When you die, your body is just a bag of
bones, no matter what a work of art your body is. Man can't create even one cell in the lab. Even if he could, it would still be a dead cell.
DEAD. How do you get a planet full of living creatures without the author and finisher of life being part of that? Answer: It's not going to
Life comes from life. This is a FACT. Not a theory. A FACT. The evolutionists would like to WISH this is not so, and they have a lame-brained
THEORY (that I would not dignify as a theory because it is preposterous and it's been around long enough, this stupid "theory,") The evolutionists
have had more than ENOUGH time to prove their stupid theory. I say time's up and let's just go with the EVIDENCE.
But no. The evolutionists say, why should we believe our lying eyes? And they just keep scratching in the dirt hoping for some magical creature to
pop up that will prove there is no God, that evolution is true after all. The one who finds this proof will get the Nobel Peace Prize and become a
billionaire and be a bigger hero than Neal Armstrong. (I say that sarcastically about Neal Armstrong). But they will be similar kinds of heros --
false and phony ones.
99 percent of government-funded "science" is seeking to disprove the existence of God. The government is controlled by the Illuminati. The
Illuminati worship Lucifer. Duh. Figure it out yourself.
These are facts. Not theory. Facts. Since when is there something wrong with acknowledging facts as truth? Now all of a sudden if you do this, you
are considered to be a supersitious religious creep who believes in that G word.
The Bible says The fool has said in his heart there is no God.
I'm no fool. I don't like being fooled. I will ask questions and use the brain God gave me and figure out things for myself. I will listen to
what people tell me, but if what they tell me doesn't make any sense I don't care who it is that tells me. It can be Dan Rather, my high school
science teacher, my parents, my best friend, National Geographic, the Smithsonian, the Pope -- I don't care. I can think for myself, and I will
think for myself, and nobody is going to tell me that what I know isn't so, IS so.
[edit on 5-11-2005 by resistance]