It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Thirty-nine percent of those interviewed said they would vote for Bush in the hypothetical election.
Originally posted by Carseller4
Bush would lose an election he can't run in if the election were held today?
Who is stupider? CNN or the people that replied to this poll?
Originally posted by Zaphod58
Under the Constitution, the President serves a four-year term. Amendment XXII (which took effect in 1951 and was first applied to Dwight D. Eisenhower starting in 1953) limits the president to either two four-year terms or a maximum of ten years in office should he have succeeded to the Presidency previously and served two years at most completing his predecessor's term. Since then, three presidents have served two full terms: Dwight Eisenhower, Ronald Reagan, and Bill Clinton. Incumbent President George W. Bush would become the fourth if he completes his current (and second) term in 2009. (Richard Nixon was elected to a second term but resigned before completing it.)
en.wikipedia.org...
After Roosevelt, IIRC, served like four terms it was decided to limit the number of terms a President could stay in office.
Originally posted by AnAbsoluteCreation
BH,
After what the GOP did with BUSH. The Dem's are just trying to cash in on the fact that nobody will vote a rep. for pres for another twenty years. Athough good link, that doesn't validate the author's intentions for this thread.
Originally posted by Benevolent Heretic
But here's why Bush couldn't serve a 3rd consecutive term:
Originally posted by Benevolent Heretic
Actually, there was a bill to Repeal the 22nd Amendment H. J. RES. 24
New bill to Congress (repeal 22nd amendment)
The interesting thing is that the sponsers of the bill are mostly democrats.
Rep. Steny Hoyer [D-MD]
Cosponsors:
Rep. Howard Berman [D-CA]
Rep. Frank Pallone [D-NJ]
Rep. Martin Sabo [D-MN]
Rep. F. James Sensenbrenner [R-WI]
But here's why Bush couldn't serve a 3rd consecutive term:
Section 2. This Article shall be inoperative unless it shall have been ratified as an amendment to the Constitution by the legislatures of three-fourths of the several States within seven years from the date of its submission to the States by the Congress.
[edit on 30-11-2005 by Benevolent Heretic]