This topic is in the Aircraft Projects discussion forum.  (rss)


X-33 / X-34 Replacement (VentureStar)




Topic started on 15-10-2002 @ 03:34 AM by quaneeri


external image


Lockheed Unveils Images of Revised Venturestar
By Jonathan Lipman

Special to space.com
posted: 11:42 am ET
05 January 2000



WASHINGTON (States News Service) -- Lockheed Martin VentureStar released these images of the redesigned VentureStar, a proposed reusable launch vehicle.

The proposed look of the vehicle was changed late last year when engineers decided to move the payload bay outside of the vehicle's body. They added a pencil-shaped external payload, shown here carrying a satellite.

The VentureStar proposal calls for Lockheed to build the craft entirely on its own, without government funding.

Designed initially to fly unmanned, the VentureStar will service the commercial satellite market.

A manned version is expected to follow, and NASA will buy time on the craft to send astronauts to the International Space Station.

By moving the payload external it becomes modular, VentureStar CEO Jerry Rising said last year. The entire bay can be expanded if necessary, or removed entirely to be replaced by a proposed Crew Return Vehicle designed specifically for the ISS.

While VentureStar is a privately funded effort, the X-33, its beleaguered prototype is a joint venture funded by Lockheed and NASA.

The X-33 has a similar wedge shape and a similar internal structure of liquid hydrogen and liquid oxygen tanks, but is half the size of the full craft. Already a year delayed, construction on the X-33 has halted until NASA discovers why a panel on one of the fuel tanks burst during testing.

www.space.com...



reply to this post:   copyright & usage 


reply posted on 18-10-2002 @ 09:51 PM by necro99


Anything better than the Space Shuttle



reply to this post:   copyright & usage 


reply posted on 24-10-2002 @ 02:05 AM by quaneeri


Necro.

I agree, the space shuttle has past its used by date:



reply to this post:   copyright & usage 


reply posted on 29-8-2004 @ 01:11 AM by Jack Martin


Were I an astronaut, I certainly would rethink taking the next shuttle mission. We're talking about seventies technology when we utter the titles Columbia, Enterprise, Endeavor, Challenger. I have your "challenge," why not use the gravitational pull of heavenly bodies to sail your craft, and let us try not stuffing our craft full of fragile human beings? Eh, ya think so?



reply to this post:   copyright & usage 


reply posted on 29-8-2004 @ 01:20 AM by FredT


They had quite a few problems with the Venture Star. However, I have to say, the VEnture star may have been the "White" sister of a "Black" project. If the miliraty worked out the bugs, we may see another stab at it.



reply to this post:   copyright & usage 


reply posted on 29-8-2004 @ 02:11 AM by Murcielago


Did you two guys look at the date? its 2 years old and the article is 4 years old. Why bother to comment on something we now know ain't gonna happen.



reply to this post:   copyright & usage 


reply posted on 29-8-2004 @ 02:26 AM by Jack Martin


We musn't change "the look." I am aghast that they have the audacity to alter "the look" of the craft. Oo, I may not survive this one.

[edit on 29-8-2004 by Jack Martin]



reply to this post:   copyright & usage 










Top Topics Right Now:



Active Topics Right Now:



ATS MIX Podcasts:











Newest Topics:












ATS Thread Tag System
Members can add a custom descriptive tag to any thread on ATS. Thread Tags will help categorize our site content, help to cross-reference similar threads, and improve the searchability of all ATS threads. This thread is currently defined by these tags:

,
















ATS Server: www4.theabovenetwork.com
Powered by AboveTop:Board v2.3
Header data processed in 0.002 seconds
Page processed in 0.078 seconds
7 total database queries (1)









The Above Top Secret Conspiracy Community Web site is a wholly owned social content community of The Above Network, LLC.





thread