Story Here
Quack quack.
What a joke. Like the terrorist would even pay if courts give judgement to the Insurers. And besides, why they suing the terrorist. Why not sue the
govt agencies that allowed the attacks to happen and those covering it up???
|
This important topic is already covered off here.
www.abovetopsecret.com...
No-one touched any questions I asked there.
I labelled it as a political scandal because it is. You will find ties between the firm authorized to conduct these suits and the admin.
It is, as you rightly say, just quackery.
|
OOps. I looked and never say that one. I guess I didn't look hard enough.
But yes, it is quakery. I mean, to sue someone and win, one must have an actual defendant show in court generally. If the defendant never shows, the
suer (sewer? lol) will win. But then enforcing the imposed judgement in a case like this is going to be slightly difficult. With the defendants in
this case, how the hell do they plan on doing that????
|
Psycho,
Just to point out a momentary blip on the horizon -- after that post, your ATS points tally was 666.
|
I noticed that too and promptly added another post somewhere else. 
|
LMAO at 666 points!
*D9 puts on "Number of the Beast" and air guiters*
|
LMAO at 666 points!
*D9 puts on "Number of the Beast" and air guiters*
|
